Comments on: Pakistan Rudderless After Bhutto's Death

Grief And Violence In The Streets; Division On How To Carry On Bhutto's Legacy

Add a Comment See all 747 Comments
by jb01201a December 28, 2007 11:47 PM EST
talk2chief - well, why don''t you give us some more of your brilliant points
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman December 28, 2007 11:47 PM EST
talk2chief,,,, Al Queda & other terrorist organizations rely on under developed countries for thier bases of operation, watch North Africa closely & other countries... This is a globalizing world nowdays & people now have other choices rather than the USA,,, We have lost our world credibility on Bush''s watch
Reply to this comment
by talk2chief December 28, 2007 11:47 PM EST
chitown639, Yea we already covered that thank you Captain Obvious.
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 December 28, 2007 11:46 PM EST
"Osama, must be tried, as the world criminal he is.
Posted by talk2chief"


I agree with you. However, if he was so very important, why take the eye off the target in the first place? Actions speak louder than words.
Reply to this comment
by chitown639 December 28, 2007 11:46 PM EST
Our strategy against the Russians was to get them entangled in a never-ending war that would destroy the country economically from within. posted by whatithink

Yeah, now it seems that the same strategy is working against us....
Reply to this comment
by talk2chief December 28, 2007 11:45 PM EST
j-whitman. I agree about Afghanistan. Historically speaking it will difficult to restore any kind of order in that part of the world. The jury is still out on what to do there.
Reply to this comment
by talk2chief December 28, 2007 11:43 PM EST
If our economy collapses, Osama is the least of our worries.

Posted by whatithink

Key word is IF, that is not tangible, the war, oil and economic policy are fluid and can change. I agree it is dire, but not as dire as it was after Vietnam. Osama, must be tried, as the world criminal he is.
Reply to this comment
by jb01201a December 28, 2007 11:43 PM EST
Lets hear some more brilliant points from you fools on the left !
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman December 28, 2007 11:40 PM EST
talk2chief,,,, In Iraq I would agree with you, it''s what their government is demanding,,, But not Afaganistan which was always the center of terrorism if we exclude the UAE..... It''s a bare bones country that has no infrastructure at all.
Reply to this comment
by zootallures2 December 28, 2007 11:38 PM EST
Russia.... Putin is backing out of the false flag terror. That piece of sh*t will burn in hell for killing 300 children for Chechen oil. The children said the terrorists were helping us out and the russian army was shooting us.
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 December 28, 2007 11:38 PM EST
talk2chief,

If our economy collapses, Osama is the least of our worries. Have you watched the value of the dollar decline in recent years? This War on Terror is quickly becoming a War on Economics. As we print money to fund Iraq and Afghanistan, we are digging a bigger and bigger hole.
Reply to this comment
by talk2chief December 28, 2007 11:35 PM EST
j-whitman, I don''t think so, I think we will have no choice but to withdraw.
Reply to this comment
by talk2chief December 28, 2007 11:33 PM EST
Our strategy against the Russians was to get them entangled in a never-ending war that would destroy the country economically from within. How are we fixing this?

Posted by whatithink

Which worked against the Russians, but what did we do to shore up the Afghan people? Nothing which allowed the Taliban to step in and allow Osama and his boys to do, well there thing.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman December 28, 2007 11:29 PM EST
talk2chief,,, We''ve only just this year started dealing correctly with the problem in Afaganistan & our Generals are still waiting for the troops they asked for 2 years ago ---- Count on it taking another 30 years
Reply to this comment
by usayesterday December 28, 2007 11:29 PM EST
Our strategy against the Russians in Afghanistan is coming home to roost!

Posted by whatithink

You have a very valid point. 100% correct. That is why we have to deal with it today. Whether it be Bush, Clinton, or whoever becomes president, it is a malignant cyst that must be removed.

Posted by talk2chief at 08:25 PM : Dec 28, 2007
..........

Yes, our foreign policy in the past two to three decades has come full circle.

We are supposed to learn history to avoid repeating it. But learning history sure doesn''t mean a damm when our political leaders chose to ignore it in exchange for monetary gain.
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 December 28, 2007 11:29 PM EST
talk2chief,

Our strategy against the Russians was to get them entangled in a never-ending war that would destroy the country economically from within. How are we fixing this?
Reply to this comment
by zootallures2 December 28, 2007 11:28 PM EST
Binex did it. You know what the numbers are for? It''s to fool and scare the Masons. The founder of the US. When bush talks NWO and "the ages", it like Pat Robertson talking Jesus. You can be a Christian, Jew, Muslim or even in the Church of satan and be a Mason. George Washinton on the other hand only wanted people of a good God.
Reply to this comment
by talk2chief December 28, 2007 11:25 PM EST
Our strategy against the Russians in Afghanistan is coming home to roost!

Posted by whatithink

You have a very valid point. 100% correct. That is why we have to deal with it today. Whether it be Bush, Clinton, or whoever becomes president, it is a malignant cyst that must be removed.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman December 28, 2007 11:24 PM EST
talk2chief,,,, Whatever,,,, It wasn''t our job to get rid of another countries leader, no matter how bad he was, it was their problem just as in every other country ------- We don''t go around the world destroying governments -- Hitler did that
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 December 28, 2007 11:24 PM EST
talk2chief,

And if you had come to the U.S. population with that explanation of why we should go to war, THERE WOULD BE NO WAR!

Many in other countries believe GW to be a very bad man. Do you want someone invading us? No matter how bad it gets, I doubt any American would ever want to be occupied by ANOTHER COUNTRY for no reason (let alone a reason)!
Reply to this comment
See all 747 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lobbyists Pushed Off U.S. Advisory Panels

    (215 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: