Comments on: Bhutto Slaying Roils Pakistan
Pakistani Opposition Leader Shot By Suicide Bomber, Police Say
Add a Comment See all 1316 Comments
- Answer these few simple questions. After all, you want everyone to know you%u2019re a true American and Patriot, don%u2019t you?
1. Who%u2019s fault was it for 9/11? OBL%u2019s fault or President Bush%u2019s?
2. If you think it was President Bush%u2019s fault, would you think that he is the only President in history that is not allowed to make any mistakes? Yes or No.
3. Do you want America to win in Afghanistan and Iraq? Yes or No.
4. If so, what are the advantages to America when we stabilize Iraq and Afghanistan in the middle east?
5. What are the Geo-Political effects of pulling out of Iraq and Afghanistan prematurely? - Reply to this comment
- And as far as stratfor is concerned, if I''''ve never heard of them, then how am I supposed to be able to trust them? Why don''''t you pay closer attention to the news networks that don''''t have "FOX" in their names if you want real info.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hungry1968
Well then HUNGRY, dont let CNN guide your thoughts, go check out STRATFOR for yourself. You can do that, cant you? - Reply to this comment
- radiob,,,, Id still rather have the National Security position though, my temper is too short for much else
- Reply to this comment
- And AGAIN - an unarmed drone saw him in Tora Bora in 2005, and they had very actionable intelligence that he was there again this past August. They didn''''t have anyone in the region to send into the area immediately - apparently all of our ground troops are tied up in Iraq instead of fighting the war on terror.
"You see, there are fuuck ups on many fronts to capturing OBL."
You have to be looking for him in order to catch him...
Drones, known to have smoked a few terrorists these past couple of years but yet, we send unarmed drones to look for Bin Laden?
Your arguments dont make any sense HUNGRY.
As far as Iraqs concerned, we shouldnt be there because that''s what HUNGRY and CNN/PMSNBC believes.
That''s not what the majority of Americans who voted think. And that my friend, is what counts. - Reply to this comment
- radio,,,,, I can''''t believe I didn''''t negotiate salary or percs with you, you are one silver tounge devil Mr. President
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by j-whitman
Must be how I became elected without running. I will accept your confirmation for the position of press secretary. Tony Snow cannot spell either, so it''s not really important and Ice can help you with it as secretary of education. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by poopusbuttus at 12:40 AM : Dec 28, 2007
"HUNGRY. If the CIA knows he comes back and forth, wouldnt that say to you that he could have been taken out?"
And AGAIN - an unarmed drone saw him in Tora Bora in 2005, and they had very actionable intelligence that he was there again this past August. They didn''t have anyone in the region to send into the area immediately - apparently all of our ground troops are tied up in Iraq instead of fighting the war on terror.
"You see, there are fuuck ups on many fronts to capturing OBL."
You have to be looking for him in order to catch him...
"However, I dont agree with how many troops in Iraq. Gen Shinseki had it right from the beginning. There should have been at least 250K there from the start."
There should have been ZERO troops from the start in Iraq. There was never any reason to invade Iraq, and Germany has documented that the defector "curveball" was unreliable and not to be trusted - and since this was the ONLY EVIDENCE that Bush had regarding WMD''s in Iraq, it should have been enough to at least delay the invasion until more proof was gathered. Meanwhile, the people that ACTUALLY attacked us are allowed to go free - and that makes sense to you?!?!?!
And as far as stratfor is concerned, if I''ve never heard of them, then how am I supposed to be able to trust them? Why don''t you pay closer attention to the news networks that don''t have "FOX" in their names if you want real info. - Reply to this comment
- poopusbuttus,,,,, Oh, so now you want bi-partisanship ???? ----- FYI, you have to give in order to recieve.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by j-whitman
I''ve always wanted bi-partisanship. Except for those of you who claim that Iraq is a failure before it''s even over. Which by the way, is most of you libs on here. - Reply to this comment
- radio,,,,, I can''t believe I didn''t negotiate salary or percs with you, you are one silver tounge devil Mr. President
- Reply to this comment
- radiob,,,,, OK, I''ll take the job --- I hope you don''t mind my spelling Mr. President
- Reply to this comment
- He''''s been back and forth several times across the border AS DOCUMENTED BY THE CIA!!! IF, and that''''s a big IF, we had 190,000 troops in Afghanistan instead of Bush withdrawing most of our troops, we might have been able to catch him, or at least hampered his operations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hungry1968
HUNGRY. If the CIA knows he comes back and forth, wouldnt that say to you that he could have been taken out?
You see, there are fuuck ups on many fronts to capturing OBL. I trust the govt''s assessment of how many troops they need in Afghanistan since they are groung zero with the intelligence.
However, I dont agree with how many troops in Iraq. Gen Shinseki had it right from the beginning. There should have been at least 250K there from the start.
I''ve never wavered from that. But, I disagree with your assessment that Iraq is a lost cause. It''s working out for the better now and to call Iraq a failure at this point is ludacris. - Reply to this comment
- poopusbuttus,,,,, Oh, so now you want bi-partisanship ???? ----- FYI, you have to give in order to recieve.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by j-whitman at 12:32 AM
The administration needs a George Stephanopoulos to keep the public updated with all of the cabinet positions and policy positions. We could use your talents in that respect, all of the other candidates have accepted warmly the positions. So far we are doing this for free, have to keep the lobbyist at bay. Imagine that becoming president of the US and never even run for it or raise billions of dollars for it like the other 17 lapdogs I beat. - Reply to this comment
- BIG TIME CORRECTION - my bad!!
"One, the amount of Afghan troops now trained"
Which is next to nothing because they keep quitting. You see the opium farms pay much better than the military does. Too bad you didn''t notice that the rebuilding of AFGHANISTAN has been left to the NATO nation''s that are now resenting being forced to clean up the mess that Bush ran away from. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by realpatriot1
See below. That''s about as bi-partisan as you can get. - Reply to this comment
- "One, the amount of Afghan troops now trained"
Which is next to nothing because they keep quitting. You see the opium farms pay much better than the military does. Too bad you didn''t notice that the rebuilding of Iraq has been left to the NATO nation''s that are now resenting being forced to clean up the mess that Bush ran away from.
"and two, OBL isnt in Afghanistan (or so the CIA says) Which makes sense. Would you be there knowing that the US is looking for you?"
He''s been back and forth several times across the border AS DOCUMENTED BY THE CIA!!! IF, and that''s a big IF, we had 190,000 troops in Afghanistan instead of Bush withdrawing most of our troops, we might have been able to catch him, or at least hampered his operations. - Reply to this comment
- radiob,,,, Are you offering me a job ?? I''m not the secretary type, I don''t like skirts or dictaphones ---- But I''d gladly take the Natilonal Secruity position at 1/3 the salary of anyone in this administration
- Reply to this comment
- poopusbuttus,
Proclaiming that you won an argument is not winning an argument. Winning an argument is when others acknowledge that you have a point.
I haven''t read all of your posts today but the ones I have are nothing more than opinionated hateful rants against liberals with no factual basis to support them.
You''ve said that you believe that we need to combat terror on both the military and diplomatic frnt; I''d be sincerely interested in hearing more about your views in that regard if you could discuss it without the mindless partisonship.
I have to get some sleep now but I''ll check in the morning to see if you actually add anything useful to the discussion.
Hungry,
Excellent point about NATO in Afghanistan. I read the MSNBC article you referenced earlier about the CIA tracking OBL/Al Zawari at Tora Bora this past July. I was especially interested by the fact that the CIA cut off the escape routes on the Afghan side but no one cut off the escape routes on the Pakastani side. - Reply to this comment
- Oh - I got it now. Don''''t pay attention to the news, or try to absorb information - listen to conservative think tanks like "The American Enterprise Institute", "The Heritage Foundation", and Fox News - right?
Yeah - I''''ll check out TASS and IRNA too.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hungry1968
No HUNGRY. There you go again putting words in my mouth. I never said go to conservative site either. I said STRATFOR. Also, if you remember, I pointed you to a liberal website known as FRONTLINE.org.
They have many stories that tear bush and cheney up, but, they also have many stories that solidify the CIA''s assumption that OBL is in Pakistan.
Just trying to help you out dude. You dont have to take my word for it if you dont want to. - Reply to this comment
- Do me a favor will you? Stay off the liberal websites that stuff that *** down your throat and go read STRATFOR.COM''''s assessment of Bin Laden.
They are perhaps the only people outside of the CIA who knows how it all works together on the geo-political front.
Posted by poopusbuttus at 12:22 AM : Dec 28, 2007
Oh - I got it now. Don''t pay attention to the news, or try to absorb information - listen to conservative think tanks like "The American Enterprise Institute", "The Heritage Foundation", and Fox News - right?
Yeah - I''ll check out TASS and IRNA too. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by j-whitman at 12:23 AM
You are aware that Tweb declared me president of the US on 12/22/07 are you not? Starleo is the vice president, ST is the attorney general, Tool is the secretary of state, Ice is secretary of education, Randall is secretary of defense, and formersarge is director of homeland security, donnie900 is secretary of health, I need a secretary to remember all of the positions in the new cabinet and to post them. - Reply to this comment
