Comments on: Bhutto Slaying Roils Pakistan

Pakistani Opposition Leader Shot By Suicide Bomber, Police Say

[j-whitman]

poopusbuttus,,,, You couldn''t give anything more than a yes or no answer if you had to, now good night & throw your glass pipe in the trash

[jedemdaseine]

Dear Poopusbuttus,
I hate to jump in to an argument, but man, you need help and I can''t give it to you, because you''re wrong about everything in this whole war on terror, maybe even Shinseki. He underestimated what we needed to win in Iraq, but that''s a moot point. We''ve already lost a war we should never have waged, killed a million Iraqi civilians who had nothing against us, and made enemies of all the surviving relatives of those we''ve killed and maimed. Muslims believe an eye for an eye. What would you do to a person or country who killed a member of your family? I know the answer, because I know your type. You probably claim Christianity, but know as much about scripture as Paris Hilton, and would never forgive.
Do you think the Iraqis believe in our form of democracy now, when so many have died, when so much infrastructure that worked, like having clean water at the tap and electricity from a switch instead of a generator has been destroyed by our country? No way!
On the Afghan war, we should have at least put the 10th Mountain and a few Ranger regiments at the border to stop the Taliban and OBL at the border. But that would have never happened because of the chickenhawk neo-cons more interested in securing Israel by trying to change the whole Middle East into "democracies" or at least regimes friendly to Israel. We''re being run by traitors. I know you''re no traitor, so why support people who betrayed us (as in U.S.) to secure another country''s borders?

[j-whitman]

poopusbuttus,,, Your on the east coast aren''t you ??? --- FYI, it''s tweek thirty your time,,,, ten thirty west coast time... We can continue this battle at another time ------ Go get some sleep, it would help

[poopusbuttus]

I''''ve given you all the answeers you asked for --- Only an idiot thinks there is a simple yes or no answer === So stop the BS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by j-whitman

Now JWHITMAN, come on man. They are simple questions. You''re engaging in the David Letterman tactics of avoiding simple questions.

If Clinton was in Office, and as much as I dispised him, I would answer the yes or no questions.+

[j-whitman]

poopusbuttus,,, Haven''t I told you Reid is a bad actor ??? But he''s no coward, he''s a boxer & faced his opponents man to man ------- Bush has always hid behind Mommy & Daddy, his clones, & uses proxy''s to fight & lawyers ----- The SOB is even afraid of horses & cows

I''ve given you all the answeers you asked for --- Only an idiot thinks there is a simple yes or no answer === So stop the BS

[poopusbuttus]

poopusbuttus,,,, That''''s another foolish statement assuming there are yes or no answers ----- To morons it is that simple, I''''m getting sick & tired of you & your party calling Americans stupid


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by j-whitman


I dont think your stupid JWHIT, as I told HUNGRY the Troop Trasher before, I just think you misinformed.

[poopusbuttus]

poopusbuttus,,,, It''''s not the GOP poison rhetoric of "Blame America 1st" that goes back to Nixon & Viet Nam GOP rhetoric ------ It''''s totall unabridged incompetence


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by j-whitman

Not only did you avoid directly aswering the questions to my little test JWHIT, but you flunked badly.

You see, I never expected you to answer them directly because I know that you and your kind never would.

Answering those direct simple questions negates everything you''ve been probably arguing about since Bush has been elected.

You hate Bush. And that''s all there is too it.

I firmly believe that if Bush came out and said two plus two equals four, and then Harry Reid came out and said that it equals five, you would believe Reid simply because of your hatred of Bush.

You know I''m right, dont you?

[j-whitman]

poopusbuttus,,,, That''s another foolish statement assuming there are yes or no answers ----- To morons it is that simple, I''m getting sick & tired of you & your party calling Americans stupid

[j-whitman]

poopusbuttus,,,, It''s not the GOP poison rhetoric of "Blame America 1st" that goes back to Nixon & Viet Nam GOP rhetoric ------ It''s totall unabridged incompetence

[poopusbuttus]

poopusbuttus,,,,, Has Bush hurt our country ??? Answer yes or no


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by j-whitman

No. You see, it''s pretty simple to answer direct questions, isnt it?

[j-whitman]

poopusbuttus,,,,, Has Bush hurt our country ??? Answer yes or no

[poopusbuttus]

poopusbuttus,,,,,

1.... It was both their faults --- Bush ignored the warnings not to appear Clintonesque
2.... 9/11 or invading a country that was no longer a threat wasn''''t an itty bitty mistake nor was the damage to our national security that it caused
3.... Of course we want to win in Afaganistan, that is the center of the War on Terror, not Iraq ---- But we aren''''t winning, far from it
4..... Bush or the GOP can''''t stabilize Iraq, Isreal, Afaganistan nor anywhere else in the Middle East ---- He''''s destabilized all the regions involved.
5..... We don''''t have a choice on Iraq, they want us out by the end of next year...... Afaganistan we are committed for at least the next 30 years


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by j-whitman


Excellent JWHITMAN. A true "Blame America First" type of guy you are. Excellent. SINGINRICK would be proud

[poopusbuttus]

HUNGRY -- STATFOR''s been around for a long time, dummy. That''s why you are so naive.....

[j-whitman]

poopusbuttus,,,,,

1.... It was both their faults --- Bush ignored the warnings not to appear Clintonesque
2.... 9/11 or invading a country that was no longer a threat wasn''t an itty bitty mistake nor was the damage to our national security that it caused
3.... Of course we want to win in Afaganistan, that is the center of the War on Terror, not Iraq ---- But we aren''t winning, far from it
4..... Bush or the GOP can''t stabilize Iraq, Isreal, Afaganistan nor anywhere else in the Middle East ---- He''s destabilized all the regions involved.
5..... We don''t have a choice on Iraq, they want us out by the end of next year...... Afaganistan we are committed for at least the next 30 years

[poopusbuttus]

Posted by hungry1968

HUNGRY -- Let me give you a little lesson in warfare, ok?

Let''s proceed with your assumption that there is not enough troops in Afghanistan and President HUNGRY gets elected and decided to send his 150K troops over there.

What does President HUNGRY do after all 150K troops are combat ready and in the field after he gets actionable intelligence from a drone that OBL is there?

My point is, what makes the difference if 150K, or 500K troops are in the field?

If there is no one there when the drone fly''s over, then chances are, they arent going to get him without coordinating air support, troop movements, border blockades on the Afghan side, etc....

You''re stretching it HUNGRY. You dont have a valid point.

[antizion]

Maybe since OBL was the older half brother of GW Bush''s business partner (Bander Bin Laden "Bander Bush") and childhood friend, Bush does not have such a vested interest in catching OBL.

Besides, finding him in Texas with his feet up on GW Bush''s coffee table might pull some of the official air out of the 911 story.

[hungry1968]

Well then HUNGRY, dont let CNN guide your thoughts, go check out STRATFOR for yourself. You can do that, cant you?

Posted by poopusbuttus at 01:02 AM : Dec 28, 2007



I can - but why would I? I don''t buy propaganda - I don''t care who pays for it.

If you want me to read it, then make sure it''s on the mainstream news websites - anyone can create a web page. Even you.

[hungry1968]

"Drones, known to have smoked a few terrorists these past couple of years but yet, we send unarmed drones to look for Bin Laden?

Your arguments dont make any sense HUNGRY."

The unarmed drones weren''t sent to look for him - they happened upon him - too bad they were unarmed (or maybe not if you''re Bush or one of his supporters).



"As far as Iraqs concerned, we shouldnt be there because that''s what HUNGRY and CNN/PMSNBC believes.

That''s not what the majority of Americans who voted think. And that my friend, is what counts."


Really? 72% of America wants us out of there and more importantly 76% of Iraqi''s want us out of there. As far as I knew it was the will of the people that counted - not what a few delusional right wingers wanted irregardless of the will of the people.

[poopusbuttus]

poopusbuttus,,,,, You''''''''ve never met Texans like Bush have you ??? --- I have many times, I used to jerk the bar stools out from under them.... They just lay there & shake




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by j-whitman

Well JWHIT, considering that I was stationed at Ft. Bliss, Tx (El Paso) for 2 years in the 3rd Armored Calvalry Regiment, I would have to say, YES.

[j-whitman]

poopusbuttus,,,,, You''''ve never met Texans like Bush have you ??? --- I have many times, I used to jerk the bar stools out from under them.... They just lay there & shake