Comments on: New U.S. Sanctions Draw Iranian Ire

Regime, Citizens Angry At U.S., But Ahmadinejad Also Facing Fresh Criticism

[j-whitman]

Come on pal,,, I can''t believe you are that much of a party stooge.

[j-whitman]

How much international experiance ???? She was 1st Lady & traveled the world.... She has been to many countries even Iraq as Senator.

[j-whitman]

Come to think about it, Rudy didn''t have much experiance as a CEO... He spent most of his time trying to convince people Bush was a genious & running around declaring himself the Hero of 9/11.... Being mayor of a city is not a CEO.

[donbl1]

J, Hillary knows where the flowers go, how the meals are served and who maintains the photo-op appointment list. She also is big on state dinners.

She did not negotiate (except in Hillarycare) and her international experience is "0".

Unfortunately, we will not get a really good set of choices.

[j-whitman]

Dontb1,,,, Come on now, She had 7 years experiance in the White House & experiance in our Senate with the White House -----
--- Bush 43''s White House experiance ?? Snorting cocaine in his father''s 4 year Presidency.......
...... Rudy''s experiance ?? Another sold out Trial Lawer, mayor of a city that doesn''t like him -- Profiteering into the multi-millions from 9/11 which was his only lame experiance as CEO ---
--- Put away your paint brush bro.... 1,000 coats of multi colored lead or oil based paint couldn''t paint a sunshine look on Rudy

[donbl1]

J, Hillary has no experience in the White House. She was a prop. I don''t care what is putting out about the "co-White House" that is just cr@p. Doesn''t happen. She has never managed anything larger than her office staff.

Giuliani? He certainly has some baggage but kids liking him doesn''t do for me.

We need an experienced manager with a plan.

[j-whitman]

dontb1,,,, There isn''t any comparison between Hillary & Guiliani is there ??? Hillary''s experiance in the White House & federal government, great family values, an attention to the War on Terror (that pissis off liberals), & toughness.

Rudy''s incest & kids that hate him to running from the Iraq Study Group & 9/11 profiteering === The only ones who want Rudy are the hard core neo-cons, Rudy will do as he is told to continue this radical war mongering policies of Bush''s

[donbl1]

As I said, either Giuliani or Hillary.

Neither one is exactly what we need to solve problems.

[j-whitman]

donbl1,,,, That''s illogical --- We are a growing nation with growing problems both foreign & domestic, our infastructure is falling apaart, illegal immigration is insane & out of control, we can''t secure our borders -- The list is long my friend.

[donbl1]

We are going to end up with two choices: Giuliani or Hillary.

They are very different and both carry a lot of baggage.

[j-whitman]

dontb1,,,, We need change, no more visionary''s and definately no Guiliani -- That will lead us to more corruption ------ We need people with something other than a neo-con or theo-con logic on the world.

[donbl1]

Government always works under the law of unexpected consequences. That is why many believe government should be as small and unobtrusive as possible.

I kind of laugh at Rangels tax proposals although I have grown to respect him. The possible "unexpected consequences" are infinite and hard to reverse.

[j-whitman]

You are right about Bush not being happy with his agenda over the last years... But who''s fault is that ?? --- Maybe that''s why they ignored the warnings on the 9/11 attack seriously.

You have to start looking at the truth & the historical facts, we have contributed to many of the problems that are hitting us in the face, & understand them.
.... It''s not just Democrats believing all is bad in America --- That''s nothing but hype that causes the ignorance & divisions in the 1st place.
... Quite frankly I don''t understand how anyone with have an education can say our past polices don''t caus problems

[donbl1]

J, I don''t think Bush is happy with how his 8 years have been spent. I am sure he went in with a much different set of goals but 9/11 set in motion a series of events that were not on his agenda and he probably realizes he did not manage them as well as he would have liked.

But, I am also getting tired of the Democrats thinking all is bad with America. It isn''t. The Iraq War isn''t the only thing going on in America and there are a lot of good people doing good deeds.

We need a visionary who has the ability to manage a multimillion employee organization and lead it in one direction AND win the war on terror which is not going away.

Those people do not come along every day. Hope we find one.

[j-whitman]

dontb1,,,, Bush''s sanctions don''t carry any weight in Iran.

Here''s an intresting poll ----
People who believe in Ghosts - 34%
People who believe in Bush Iraq policy - 30%

[j-whitman]

donbl1,,,, Come on man, you know better than that. I know you do.

[donbl1]

J, you could say that everything is falling apart if you are Hillary.

Some are glass half full and some are glass half empty.

[j-whitman]

hungry1968,,, You''ve got that right, Everything is flowers & sunshine with Bush

[hungry1968]

Ok folks...have to run over to another link. I have to hunt down HUNGRY and smoke him out of his hole to agitate him some more....

Posted by poopusbuttus at 07:50 PM : Oct 26, 2007



Why didn''t you respond to my post:
Posted by hungry1968 at 06:55 PM : Oct 26, 2007
I swear you said you wanted to lgically debate the issue and then you ran away - again. I just figured you were licking your wounds - again. If ever you would like to have an intelligent discussion without running away - again, just let me know. Instead of coming across with an attitude like "Bush is awesome therefore I win all arguments", why don''t you try to logically debate the issues?

And little boy, I don''t get agitated easy. Especially by people like you who wear blinders and believe everything is perfect in the world because of Bush, when in fact his policies ARE the problem.

[j-whitman]

sqeakinup,,, So now we are back to being called terrorist appeasers ???? Is that what you call the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff ???