Comments on: Iran: We Can Fire 11,000 Missiles A Minute

Saber Rattling From Military Commander Promises A Quick Response To Any Attack

[zootallures2]

You sound like you''''re from North Korea like seven-pesos

Posted by jowand at 09:47 AM : Oct 21, 2007

Maybe??? It''s getting to look more and more like it everyday. Na, Daddy Bush would never give up his rain boots because poor people don''t have any...lol.

[zootallures2]

Well how about 1 that will turn your F^U^C^K^I^N^G land to glass!?

Posted by trenticus at 09:52 AM : Oct 21, 2007

It has to reach the land first.

[zootallures2]

The U.S. Nuclear Submarine Fleet can launch its nuclear missiles for anywhere and hit targets anywhere on the planet even when docked!- tbweb

The only ones who can''t see you are your own civilians. Is that for bombing your own cities and blaming other people? Or are you going to bomb yourself for blowing up your own buildings? The double jointed cheifs of staff...LOL blow yourself..ha ha ha!

[drummer94]

I see the crazies are out in force this am. Even when they get debated into the ground previously the blinders come back on and they want to rehash old stuff. They gotta be gettin paid. (and whomevere is paying is not getting their pennies worth). In a nutshell, the American military is more than capable of winning any real conflict if left to do so. The debacle in Iraq is generating so much money for the dark forces that be, that an end to the war would mean no more bucks for them. I figure that will happen though, around November 2008.

[jowand]

Hows that Korean war going? Got your spy ship back yet?


Posted by zootallures2 at 09:45 AM : Oct 21, 2007

You sound like you''re from North Korea like seven-pesos

[jowand]

Russia doesn''''t even bother to build aircraft carriers because the can take out all of yours before you get a plane off the deck. The plasma stealth MiG makes your Raptor more of a Rapture. And Hugo Chavez has 50 hiding around. They don''''t even need a runway or a deck. So when you invading Venezeula again? After Iran, right? The almighty US and A...LOL!!!

Posted by zootallures2 at 09:36 AM : Oct 21, 2007

Russia doesn''t have access to reliable warm water ports.

[zootallures2]

But last month, Adm. William Fallon, the top U.S. military commander in the Middle East, said he believes Iran is not as strong as it portrays itself. "Not militarily, economically or politically," he said.

Hows that Korean war going? Got your spy ship back yet?

[tbweb]

Russia doesn''''t even bother to build aircraft carriers because the can take out all of yours before you get a plane off the deck. The plasma stealth MiG makes your Raptor more of a Rapture. And Hugo Chavez has 50 hiding around. They don''''t even need a runway or a deck. So when you invading Venezeula again? After Iran, right? The almighty US and A...LOL!!!

Posted by zootallures2 at 09:36 AM : Oct 21, 2007,,,

The U.S. Nuclear Submarine Fleet has no equal or peers and the U.S. really doesn''t need any more than that. The U.S. Nuclear Submarine Fleet can launch its nuclear missiles for anywhere and hit targets anywhere on the planet even when docked! No nation can even track them, peek a boo, we see you, can you see US? LOL

[jowand]

Slavery was the Blacks fault and Reservations are the Indians fault. If the Black hadn''''t arrogantly come so close to your ships....


Posted by zootallures2 at 09:41 AM : Oct 21, 2007

Biggest slavers were Arabs and other blacks

[zootallures2]

The Iranians arrogantly flew their civilian jetliner...
Posted by tbweb at 09:35 AM : Oct 21, 2007

And nothing was ever Nelly Olson''s fault on little house on the praire, either...LOL! Saddam''s favorite show I heard...lol!

Slavery was the Blacks fault and Reservations are the Indians fault. If the Black hadn''t arrogantly come so close to your ships....

[jowand]

11,0000 in one minute, that called premature ej******n

[zootallures2]

I don''''t think we have the capability to launch planes from submarines from ON TOP of the water, much less underneath it!!

Posted by hungry1968 at 09:20 AM : Oct 21, 2007

Russia doesn''t even bother to build aircraft carriers because the can take out all of yours before you get a plane off the deck. The plasma stealth MiG makes your Raptor more of a Rapture. And Hugo Chavez has 50 hiding around. They don''t even need a runway or a deck. So when you invading Venezeula again? After Iran, right? The almighty US and A...LOL!!!

[tbweb]

Iran has American blood on its hands - Posted by tbweb

You shot down a Irainian passenger jet with a missile from a US war ship. You bomb them with chemical weapons with Saddam. Over threw there elected leader and put in the Shah. Who are you, scumbag?

Posted by zootallures2 at 09:16 AM : Oct 21, 2007,,,

The Iranians arrogantly flew their civilian jetliner over the U.S. Fleet in the Persian Gulf during heightened tensions with the sole purpose of discovering U.S. Military positions and relaying that information to the Iranian military, no one is stupid, and then counting on the U.S. not to respond, while I disagree the jet was attacking and thats why it was shot down, the Iranians have only themselves to blame for putting that jet in harms way in that situation! Shiite happens! Even if the U.S. did give Saddam chemical weapons, the U.S. has no direct control over how Saddam uses them, how can you blame the U.S. for Saddam''s dirty deed? Looking at the current situation in Iran, the U.S. should have kept the Shah is power, many would agree this current Iranian government should be overthrown as well! Deja Vu ...

[poopusbuttus]

HUGRY %u2013

1. And there you have it. Your lack of historical knowledge and your %u201CUnwillingness%u201D to defend anything, is the flaw in your thought process. In fact, you %u201CWILL%u201D not defend anything, from a global perspective. And by that, your 40-50 little Hitlers, allowed to run around unchecked, would spell doom, from a global perspective.

2. I%u2019m a capitalist. I don%u2019t see a problem with people making profits. Furthermore, I wouldn%u2019t trust the government to run a socialized health care system for a country with 300 + million people. That%u2019s the difference between me and you. I don%u2019t mind working and paying for my healthcare in a capitalist society. You%u2019re a socialist and don%u2019t want to pay for it. Cradle to grave entitlements are want you want.

3. Come on man, the logistics in the military will always be there. Don%u2019t be an idiot. If Halliburton goes away, do you think the U.S. govt is going to let the soldiers starve? HAHAHA.

Lastly, answered not one, of my questions to you. But, thank you for your socialistic input. I%u2019ve proved my point that your whole train of thought rallies around your hatred of President (elected not once, but twice) Bush.

[zootallures2]

3. Yes, we are increasing our military power. Would you advocate that we diminish it? From a global perspective, what would be the result for the U.S. in doing so?

No you''re not. Smart people know 9/11 was an inside job and leave. So, no smart people, no smart weapons. CBS not tell you about that? School don''t teach you that? You are slowly turning into a nation of idiots lead by idiots. Like the countries you once defeated.

[hungry1968]

hungry1968, you blab all you want like a little kid "my daddy can beat your daddy" , but it won''''t change the fact that they will attack you. They have submarines that can lauch planes from under water, dude. They would kick your azz. They hate you. You shot one of their passenger planes and dumped chemical weapons on them.
Posted by zootallures2 at 09:11 AM : Oct 21, 2007


Wow!! They are far more advanced than we are!!

I don''t think we have the capability to launch planes from submarines from ON TOP of the water, much less underneath it!!

By the way - I never shot at a plane and I''ve never launched a chemical weapon.

[zootallures2]

Speading Democracy????????? The US is suppose to be a Republic. "And to the Democracy for which it stands"???? I don''t think so, dumb azzes.

[hungry1968]

3. Yes, we are increasing our military power. Would you advocate that we diminish it? From a global perspective, what would be the result for the U.S. in doing so?

So you advocate creating a false war, under false pretenses, using false evidence, so that we can funnel money into the industrial military complex? Also, that money isn''t bolstering our long term security. Providing unregulated "service" contracts to Haliburton to provide "logistics" doesn''t do anything for our country. When their contracts expire, who will provide food for the troops? Who will provide services such as laundry, and replacing worn uniforms? No one. Because in farming out these "logistics" services, the already established military "logistics" elements were disbanded and eliminated, there by ensuring that Haliburton will always have a shot at getting a lucrative contract. How is that good for our long term security? Sounds to me like it was sold out.

[zootallures2]

Iran has American blood on its hands - Posted by tbweb

You shot down a Irainian passenger jet with a missile from a US war ship. You bomb them with chemical weapons with Saddam. Over threw there elected leader and put in the Shah. Who are you, scumbag?

[hungry1968]

Posted by poopusbuttus at 09:01 AM : Oct 21, 2007


1. Do you think the U.S. is a Noble country for doing what they are doing in Iraq (getting rid of a dictator and trying to spread democracy)?

Absolutely not. We are not in the "dictator removal business". If that''s the case, we''re going to end up invading at least 40 or 50 more countries. Also, you''re advocating spreading democracy in an area of the world that doesn''t believe in a democratic society. They hate us and hate everything about us up to and including our political system. And if you want to spread Democracy around, why don''t you start in Washington DC since the inhabitants there apparently forgot what it means.

2. Yes, he vetoed the SCHIP program. Why did he do that?

1 out of 6 people don''t have any insurance at all - but him and his family do. Why is "socialized medicine" bad for America, but good for him, his family, and all the other members of government? Our current health care system is in crisis. Businesses are being crushed by the overwhelming cost of health care, patients are being denied benefits more than ever, and HMO''s and big pharmacy are making record profits. You don''t see a problem with that?