Comments on: Tehran Students Protest Ahmadinejad Speech

Demonstrators Call Iranian President "Dictator," Clash With Hardliners

[s1ckd09]

I don''''t need to convince you of anything. I do not care what you think.

I''''ve already provided all the info I''''m going to provide to you because I''''m tired of your redundant questions.

Posted by tuckerndfw at 03:47 PM : Oct 08, 2007


Exactly what I would expect from you. You can''t answer a direct question or provide info to directly support your answer, rather, you give some other data that is tangential at best and still based on speculation. Then you have the nerve to claim MY questions as being redundant! Bravo!

Oh yeah, and then you include in your post what YOU think I think, and then try to criticize me for your own delusions.

But coming from someone that gets their view of how how the real world works from a George Clooney movie, it doesn''t shock me.

[doc18d]

Tuckerndfw: As acting Ops Sgt, when exactly were those classifies documents you had such access to DECLASIFIED? You are obviously not concerned about discussing them now. Who was the declassifying authority? This Run for your lives order is quite interesting. Could it possibly be a figment of your imagination. With 20 years of service split between Army Intelligence, and Special Forces, I never once heard of a run for your life order. I have in fact heard of Planned and Maintained E&E plan. That would be an actual plan on the procedure to Escape and Evade the enemy in case of a scenario that you described. Perhaps that what you meant, but since you were only an ACTING Ops Sgt. perhaps you were just not properly briefed on reality. Or perhaps your just full of #&*$.

[s1ckd09]

s1ckd09 no he is not smarter than you originally though you just aren''''t that smart. Three days before we bombed Iraq back to the stone age the UN inspectors were in Iraq and found no trace of WMD''''s do you understand that.

Three days before the Iraq war began was proof of 11 years of continuing Iraq deception, lies, and refusal to adhere to the U.N. Resolutions, and 11 years of being in violation of the 1991 cease fire. Many of us here (that pesky majority of Americans) knew that too, and realized after 9/11 that we could no longer allow nations to be in such direct violation of U.N. Resolutions with regards to such a threatening topic. Who knows what was done in those 11 years of denying inspectors access, and we will never know.

[s1ckd09]

s1ckd09 at 03:07 PM : Oct 08, 2007

Search on "oil pipeline Afghanistan" and read all about it for yourself from whatever source you deem reliable.


Posted by tuckerndfw at 03:12 PM : Oct 08, 2007

Yes, I''ve read all about that many times. It proves nothing other than speculation.

[s1ckd09]

At best, the US has had less than 50 nations supporting our effort.

It is a matter of record that the majority of the world does not support the war on terror.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 03:08 PM : Oct 08, 2007

Nice, but you fail to make an argument against what I said. Let''s break this down so you can understand...

You said, and I quote:
"The "war on terror" is the smokescreen behind which he hides, but it is a very thin screen. The majority of the world outside the US sees right through it."

I asked for stats to back this up, and you gave me this:
"At best, the US has had less than 50 nations supporting our effort."

So you are saying that less than 50 nations support our effort on fighting the "war on terror"? Again, I ask for those stats to back it up. The war in Iraq is not all-inclusive on the War on Terror. I am unaware of any U.N. Resolution that has asked for explicit support on our War on Terror, which you claim has fewer than 50 nations in support. So get back to me on that, will you? You have a chance to convince me I''m wrong... go for it!

It still does not address your original statement that "the majority of the world sees right through the "smokescreen of 9/11"

[s1ckd09]

George Bush is not the "mastermind." He is the front man selling the snake oil to the gullible and stupid.

The people financing him and pulling his strings are not politicians, they are in corporate board rooms and lawyers'''' offices.

Bush is a puppet, he is not the puppet master.

Posted by tuckerndfw at 03:04 PM : Oct 08, 2007

HOLY ***!!!! So it IS Bill Clinton and John Edwards doing all of this... I KNEW it!!!! Keep digging that conspiracy hole, brother...
So let me get this straight... Who are these masterminds, and how is there a ring leader? Or do they have votes and majority rules? Do they exist only in a Republican White House? Who are these CEOs that aren''t answerable to the board of directors, or I guess the entire BoD is in on it too.

So you''ve "followed the money" and proven all of this?

[s1ckd09]

George Bush is not the "mastermind." He is the front man selling the snake oil to the gullible and stupid.

The people financing him and pulling his strings are not politicians, they are in corporate board rooms and lawyers'''' offices.

Bush is a puppet, he is not the puppet master.

Posted by tuckerndfw at 03:04 PM : Oct 08, 2007

HOLY ***!!!! So it IS Bill Clinton and John Edwards doing all of this... I KNEW it!!!! Keep digging that conspiracy hole, brother...
So let me get this straight... Who are these masterminds, and how is there a ring leader? Or do they have votes and majority rules? Do they exist only in a Republican White House? Who are these CEOs that aren''t answerable to the board of directors, or I guess the entire BoD is in on it too.

So you''ve "followed the money" and proven all of this?

[antoniof123]

s1ckd09 no he is not smarter than you originally though you just aren''t that smart. Three days before we bombed Iraq back to the stone age the UN inspectors were in Iraq and found no trace of WMD''s do you understand that. Some of us here knew this to be true and opposed the this war of insanity. But the majority of Americans said we should attack. Sounds a lot like the Soviet Union in the 1980''s but what the hey the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. I only hope that the neocons don''t have the same in store for us. But you go ahead and keep living your fantasy.

[s1ckd09]

The original decision to invade Afghanistan was motivated by an oil pipeline western oil companies wanted installed in western Afghanistan. Which the Taliban refused them on their terms.

Posted by tuckerndfw at 02:57 PM : Oct 08, 2007

I suppose you have proof of that?

[s1ckd09]

On September 16, 2004 Kofi Annan, the Secretary General of the United Nations, said of the invasion, "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view, from the charter point of view, it was illegal."

Posted by IOWEIGN at 02:50 PM : Oct 08, 2007

Well, there you have it. The supreme ruler of the world, Kofi Annan, said it was illegal. Did he also say that the actions taken in the oil-for-food scandal in which he was deeply involved was corrupt and illegal also? He surely didn''t have a conflict of interest, now did he?