Comments on: Iran To U.S.: No, You're The Terrorists

After U.S. Senate Calls Iran's Military Terrorist Org., Parliament Calls CIA, U.S. Army Terrorists

[j-whitman]

BaghdadsHere,,, You are partially right -- Cowards do hide behind civilians - Bush ran from active duty & hid behind his daddy. ------ What''s your excuse for not serving ???

[baghdadshere]

The UN has already defined what is TERRORISM.And as we can see its everything Iran has done.
TERRORISM IS:
-Wear explosive vest and detonate it among civilians.Thats what HAMAS,HEZBOLLAH,SHIA MILITIAS AND AL-QAEDA, all supported by IRAN do.
-To place rockets launchers among civilians just to attract israeli fire and then launch those rockets without any specific target knowing they will hit civilian area inside Israel.
-Cowardly use human shields.
-Detonate car bombs in crowded markets.
-Take airplanes full of inocent people to strike buildings full of innocent people who simply working.
...........
ITS NOT TERRORISM:
-That couple of nuclear bombs used in WWII wanst terrorism because the US was fighting agaisnt a regular army - the japanese - and against a STATE - Japan. Clearly there was a declared war going on.
-When Israel kills palestinians isnt terrorism because it does it in self defense besides to kill those terrorists of HAMAS is not terrorism.

[baghdadshere]

Wanna know the difference between a terrorist state like IRAN and the others? Thats simple: After Japan cowardly attacked Pearl Harbor using suicide pilots if the US army was terrorist like iranian revolutionary terrorist guard, it would have bombed the largest japanese city , Tokyo, where the death toll would have been higher instead of Nagazaki and Hiroshima. If the US have to do the same with Iran certainly it will not start by Tehran.

[baghdadshere]

Guys, Iran Has a parliament. Thats funny cause in a dictatorship the lawmakers are chosen by the dictator , in this case , by those ayatollahs. Even Ahmadinejad was chosen by those ayatollahs to be president.

[seven-pesos]

" they''ll throw roses at us. "

" bring ''em on! "

" mission accomplished! "

ha,ha,ha.

those simple minded southerners love that kinda talk, boy!

those republicans know exactly how to control the south.

a little flag waving here, a little bible thumping there...

those southern creeps fall right in line.

ha,ha,ha.

simple minds, christian creeps, belligerent mentality, superstitious, fearful...

that''s the bush loving south for you, folks!

[seven-pesos]

never a war the south couldn''t lose.

jefferson davis lost his,
johnson lost his
bush will lose his.

the south has lost every war they started.

idiot southern creeps are only good for sunday afternoon parades

in their tight-butt uniforms.

ha,ha,ha.

war, arrogance, phony christian creeps, crooked republican snakes...

nothing good comes out of the south!

[bigsk8fan]

Very few people are against this war in Iraq that "CONGRESS = Dems and Reps" both voted to start. . . . Posted by servant-43

i never thought this war in iraq was justified. perhaps gwb was able to fool congressional dems and reps that this was a good idea. but the lie is now uncovered. there were no wmds and no iraqi plans to attack the usa. and even if you don''t believe gwb lied, the fact is that the dems are now forcing gwb''s hand by making funding bills that are tied to supporting our troops and bringing them safely home. so i say we need more dems in congress and the white house.

gwb''s current plan is to show that he has as much fortitude as usa had in vietnam and korea. so only 3800 us soldiers killed so far. gwb wants another 50,000 to die so that he can say he fought as hard as usa did in vietnam and korea. american blood is only thing gwb doesn''t seem to care about.

[ioweign]

the usa and gwb are just going to have to take criticism from world leaders like iran''''s ahmadinijad and venezuela''''s chavez and korea, because gwb engaged in an illegal and immoral war in the first place. iraq did NOT attack the usa; was not responsible for any part of 9/11; was not planning to attack the usa; and did not have any wmds.

attacking afghanistan and the taliban govt which protected al qaeda who was responsible for 9/11 was certainly acceptable. it was the only just war engaged in by gwb so far.

Posted by bigsk8fan at 02:52 PM : Sep 30, 2007

Agree !!

[v_1618]

BUSH .. THE MAN WHO SOLD THE UNITED STATES FOR CHEEP OIL.....

[smirk5]

Asked which party they believe will best improve the health care system, 62 percent said the Democrats, while just 19 percent said the Republicans.

When the boomer voter finally realizes that the fear of losing health care is way more real than the fear of terrorism, the Republicans have nothing.

[davegf]

"Very few people are against this war in Iraq that "CONGRESS = Dems and Reps" both voted to start."

Lie. No one voted to "start" a war. A vote passed which authorised military force only after bush could prove he wasn''t lying, and only as a LAST RESORT.

[davegf]

"At Least 60 Insurgents
Killed in Iraq Firefight Most casualties believed to be Al Qaeda.


http://www.foxnews.com/story
/0,2933,298664,00.html "

Sure they did.....

All these claims of some kind of success over the last four years.....most end up being proved lies. Usually kids, old men, and women are the dead.

It''s amazing that you clowns for bush don''t seem to forget that these supposed success stories don''t eman a *** thing, otherwise, why are we still fighting four and a half years after the stupid invasion began.

[j-whitman]

servant-43,,, Actually that''s inaccurate & ignores all the political hype on" Musroom Clouds", etc. & that Iraq gave us 9/11 & lies from this White House to drive the fear and anger against Congress who opposed them, "Your either with us, or against us", "Americans that opposed us are un-American & un-patriotic or terrorist sympathisers.

Saddam Hussein was in the process of negotiating exile to prevent Bush''s invasion. ----- Bush neglected to tell America that ----
--- This war & the deaths of thousands including over 3,802 Ameican lives didn''t have to happen.

[condumism]

Actually, the US terrorists are the psychotic NEOCONS from the Fascist Southern States. I propose that we hold a national referendum by June, 2008 to vote the Fascist South out of America. It is long past due time to undo the damage done by yet another Republicon: Abraham Lincoln. After the South is voted out of America, they will soon be branded as a terrorist state by US, the USA, and by the rest of the world. Economic sanctions will soon follow.

[servant-43]

Very few people are against this war in Iraq that "CONGRESS = Dems and Reps" both voted to start. If you remember Congress got us into this war by voting to stop Iraq''s military build up and refusal to allow NATO peacekeepers into Iraq to conduct inspections. Bush and Congress both gave Iraq 3 months of warnings that this war was coming. The Bath Party of Iraq refused our warnings so Congress voted and Bush accepted this challenge.

[bigsk8fan]

the usa and gwb are just going to have to take criticism from world leaders like iran''s ahmadinijad and venezuela''s chavez and korea, because gwb engaged in an illegal and immoral war in the first place. iraq did NOT attack the usa; was not responsible for any part of 9/11; was not planning to attack the usa; and did not have any wmds.

attacking afghanistan and the taliban govt which protected al qaeda who was responsible for 9/11 was certainly acceptable. it was the only just war engaged in by gwb so far.

[servant-43]

Remember that Jesus spoke in parables so that evil could not understand what he was saying. When he speaks of a sword He is actually referring to %u201CThe Word of God%u201D. This is evidenced in the Bible in the following scripture passage: %u201CTake the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.%u201D
Ephesians 6:17

The God that is referred to is the God of the Jews (His Father %u2013 the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob).

[telecom_1]

At Least 60 Insurgents
Killed in Iraq Firefight Most casualties believed to be Al Qaeda.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298664,00.html

[servant-43]

patriotic9

How do you combine Jesus with Nazi%u2019s? Were not the Nazi%u2019s against the Jews. Furthermore, the Jews were not amongst the members of their own family.

When Jesus said that a family member would turn against a family member, He meant that one member of the family would support Jesus no matter how any one of his family felt on the issues of religion. Jesus never said that his followers should take up swords to kill their families. Jesus clearly states that He is the ONLY one with a sword.

When Jesus said that a family member would turn against a family member, He meant that one member of the family would support Jesus no matter how any one of his family felt on the issues of religion.

[prairiefox1]

THATS A GOOD ONE!
THANKS FOR THE CHANGE!