Comments on: Iran: Israel Is "Standard Bearer Of Satan"
Iran's President Ahmadinejad Says The Jewish State Will Soon Fall Apart
Add a Comment See all 224 Comments
- J and why do the democrats want "amnesty" for illegal immigrants instead of tackling the real issue the trade agreements by placing TEETH in the agreements like a living wage, humanitarian conditions, enviromental regulations? Who is lining their pockets the same folks that are lining the republicans pockets.
- Reply to this comment
- My opinion is that islamic jihad in Iraq would get exactly what they want, which is to finish off slaughtering the rest of the innocent Iraqis over there, establish their terrorist bases, and further prepare for their ultimate goal, which is to strike Israel and Jerusalem.
Posted by singinrick
And how did those conditions that you predict become favorable in Iraq? They were not favorable prior to our invasion. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by cmp271
Ahmajadeen is a NUT case and Bush is at best stupid.They both have policys that are not in favorable to the world. - Reply to this comment
- Radio,,,, "Could all 16 of our intelligence agencys be wrong with their assessment of Iraq being a cause celebre for terrorist" --- Indeed yes,,,, Bush has succeded in politicizing every dept. & government agencey,,, Abuse of Power & direct violations of the Hatch Act --- It''s another reason Democrats are actually fighting hard.
The only thing that convicted Jose Padilla was a single finger print front & back of a 5 page application he would have handeled all 5 pages.. The defense was not allowed to present evidence, witnesses or thier case.... There wasn''t 1 muslem on the Jury that I''ve found ..... No Jury of His Peers - Reply to this comment
- J the democrats controlled congress from 1954 till 1995 and passed legislation that sold our economy to the third world nations, gave American business tax breaks to do so and lifted tarriffs on goods coming into the US. How did China get most favorable trade status under whose watch? And why did the democrats "VOTE" for funding a war they said they would end and why did the democrats "VOTE" for eavesdropping when they said they opposed it? They did not have to have a vote on either.
- Reply to this comment
- This guy is a product of so much inter-breeding over the centuries it is amazing anyone over there makes any sense at all. Read the first book or two of the bible and try to follow all the family lines and who everyone is and what country they became etc. Unfortunately in todays world they can have access to nuclear weaponry. Let''s hope things change for the better and it is never used on any country, for any reason. It would destroy that country too, if they stop and think before they use it.
Bush may have bludered a few times, but, after reading some of the following websites I do wonder if he is on to something.
https://www.nostradamusonline.com/
This one is most interesting as it does seem rather to be reflecting what is happening today. A nuclear attack and retaliation, the fall out and black clouds blowing around the world, would upset the food chain and that is when the antiChrist will come forward.
http://www.prophecyupdate.com/prophecy_guide.htm
http://www.newagedirectory.com/pro/prophecy_prediction.htm
Other cultures seem to think 2011/2012 has some significance, even the book of Exodus when translated refers to this year and mentions it as judgement day. No matter who we elect next year we need to consider many things. First of all will this person be able to lead us when it really gets bad, and stop the civil unrest that will undoubtedly follow? Maybe Bush isn''t as off the mark as we think? - Reply to this comment
- Radio,,,,, Democrats have only been the majority in Congress since March
,, Republicans still control the voting in the Senate ---
-- Radio, I say BRAVO ZULU, WELL DONE DEMS KEEP UP THE HARD WORK FIGHTING THE OBSTRUCTIONISTS. - Reply to this comment
- Could all 16 of our intelligence agencys be wrong with their assessment of Iraq being a cause celebre for terrorist? Along with the Chatham House report? How did this occur? It was not when the brutal dictator Saddam was in power? He posed no threat to the world only to his own people, democracys are built from within from demands from the citizens and statesman. Where are the statesmen in Iraq? Where are our statesmen? They certainly do not belong to the "democratic or republican religion".
- Reply to this comment
- Would General Petreaus be talking about troop reduction & withdrawal or would we be re-attacking Tora Bora if Democrats were "Do Nothing Dems" ????? -- Nope
-- Would Bush''s eavesdroping progam only be limeted to 6 months ????? No it would be permenant.... Would Karl Rove have left the White House or Rumsfield ???? - Reply to this comment
- singinrick,,,, Every General in the Army & Marine Corps, active & retired (excepting General Pace) will tell you, knocking out Saddam & disposing of thier governmet is the cause of this Civil War & that is exactly when it started.
- Reply to this comment
- No Rick I can be wrong and admit when I am wrong. If we were to pull out of Iraq now what would occur to the middle east in your opinion?
Saddam was a tyrant a tyrant that we supported for decades just like we did with Tito, the Shah, and lets not forget the Phillipines. The deaths of over 250 and possibly as high as 400 civilians in one week in Northern Iraq is not something to brag about. Here are some articles from a Jewish military news reports and they do not agree with "progress being made in Iraq".
A new approach from the White House on Iraq?
http://www1.debka.com/article.php?aid=1273
Iraq breaking up into three nations.
http://www1.debka.com/article.php?aid=1270 - Reply to this comment
- radio,,, No, CBS won''t crash, I was referring to the site I got the article from...
- Reply to this comment
- Radio,,, Your choice... Oh wait, dems seem to be the only ones Pro-Choice...
... Seriously it ain''t like poker, today we have access to much much more... We just lack the desire to seek the truth...
.. What''s at stake is our all departments of our govenment, our courts, habeaus corpus, military, actual national security, decent foregin policies that work & don''t destroy, & our Supreme Court..... Republicans have to be stopped in thier tracks. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by j-whitman at 10:03 PM
Post it again although I believe I know the post and this site will not crash or stop taking comments based upon what you stated. - Reply to this comment
- excues me,,, not NAE,,, I meant the NSA
- Reply to this comment
- Radio,,,,, Come on now, you know perfectly well the GOP, FBI & NAE is monitoring all news comments sites..... I posted an article yesterday on Karl Rovener & the site was attacked immediatly.
- Reply to this comment
- Voting Democrat or Republican is like playing the craps in a casino. And many are addicted to playing over and over again regardless of the fact that they are losing only the stakes are higher they are playing with Americas future. I will never vote for a democrat or a republican again.I do not have a political religion.
- Reply to this comment
- singinrick,,,, Remember the data mining Bush said we don''t do ???? --- Our government knows more about you than you do.
- Reply to this comment
- J the only comments on this board that are monitored by the government are those that are considered radical and a threat to national security. The monitors of this board are working with the government and other sides,what Rick is referring to is private and has not occured on this boards. He is not catching my point like alot of "democrats" do not catch my point and are automatically offended thinking that it is a attack on either their faith in God when it is a a attack on their faith in the political party that they believe in.
- Reply to this comment
- singinrick,, Private conversations ???? LOL,, Our government monitors all E-mails,,, & this comments chat is read on the world wide net. You must just be praying they are private.
- Reply to this comment
