Comments on: 100 Killed In 3 Days In Afghanistan

Afghan Officials Say Casualties Include Civilians, Police, Militants; 7 Kids Killed By U.S. Air Strike

[toolmangler-2009]

You forgot one, Al Qaeda=CIA proxy for Afghanistan against Russia.

Duh...
Posted by brianbwb at 11:10 AM : Jun 18, 2007

Another reason they hate us. We didn't help them after Russia left. That put us at the top of Bin Ladens list. (That plus the fact we weren't Muslim and likely not to be either).

[brianbwb-2009]

to s1ckd09,

you ask "Are you seriously saying that we should bomb a country based on the country they came from?"

I answer, since they all died during their "deed" there was then no need to bomb anyone. How could the be in Afghanistan, when they died in NY and Wash DC?

You forgot one, Al Qaeda=CIA proxy for Afghanistan against Russia.

Duh...

[brianbwb-2009]

to Toolmangler,

And not only did we put him in, but then denied the atrocities until the evidence was overwhelming

[toolmangler-2009]

To install a puppet government that will let Bush and his former oil consultant, now president Karzai operate his oil pipeline without resistance?
Posted by brianbwb at 10:41 AM : Jun 18, 2007


Remember "Pol "Pot"?
Kill tally: One to three million (or between a quarter and a third of the country's population)

[grazinggoat]

U.S. Air Strike Kills 7 Afghan Kids
Coalition Says Suspected Al Qaeda Militants Targeted In Strike

-With all the updated intelligence, Nato (US) still look like amateur. Just wondering who is more performing into botching operations: Nato or Talibans?

[toolmangler-2009]

You say,"Not one of them wants to leave the job half done."

Now comes the big question, what "job"?

Posted by brianbwb at 10:41 AM : Jun 18, 2007

The only job they are trying to do now is stabilize the country enough to prevent a bloodbath (remember Vietnam, Cambodia)?
They would leave tomorrow if some 'one' was in control and had a workable plan for the country.
(Should'a left Saddam in charge)

[brianbwb-2009]

to Toolmangler,

You say,"Not one of them wants to leave the job half done."

Now comes the big question, what "job"?

What is the goal, to kill everyone who doesn't like our being there killing them? To install a puppet government that will let Bush and his former oil consultant, now president Karzai operate his oil pipeline without resistance?

Just what is the goal of being there, when we supposedly went in to "take out" Bin Laden, who, it seems wasn't and now isn't even there?

[brianbwb-2009]

to Toolmangler,

Many people's passports were registered that day, but only Saudis were "the hijackers"?

There were no Irish, or Brits, Americans, Iraqis, or even Afghanis on board?

Of all the Saudis who were accused, how many are definitely "hijackers", or do we assume that all Saudi passports definitely belonged to hijackers?
The only "evidence" we have is what Bush put out there, and we all know now Bush's word cannot be trusted.

Why did Bush pull the funding of the investigation just as the investigators were beginning to "follow the money"?

At one time your intuition led you to ask that question, was such an easy answer really enough to eliminate your doubts?

[s1ckd09]

wow... you ignorance astounds me. I'll make this simple.
9-11 = Al-qaida operation.
Afghanistan = Al-qaida held country.

Therefore, attack the people responsible for 9-11 which were in Afghanistan. There is absolutely no question from anybody about that, is there?
Are you seriously saying that we should bomb a country based on the country they came from? And by the way, the passports didn't have to be found, to know who had them and where they were from. They kinda keep records of those things, which is the reason people are required to have them. duh.

The biggest lie being told over there is that these people are being called "insurgents" and not "terrorists".

[toolmangler-2009]

since all the so-called hijackers had Saudi passports, (which also may have been a lie,
Posted by brianbwb at 10:16 AM : Jun 18, 2007


My cousin tells me that the passports were registered 'as' the hijackers got on the Planes.
I asked him the same question in 2001.

[toolmangler-2009]

It doesn't escape notice that simply getting our people out of there immediately, because they have no business being there is not an option for you.

Also the fact that we are bombing anyone there for no reason at all is lost on you.
Such thinking is officially termed sociopathic, get some help...
Posted by brianbwb at 09:58 AM : Jun 18, 2007




They're coming to take me away! hee hee, ho ho hah hah! (apologies to Dr Demento).

I want our troops out of there more than you can know but I am not one to cut my own throat to appease any crowd that simply doesn't get the big picture. (And 'NO" I am not a bush_baby either).
I have people over there also that I love very much and they are telling me about the mess that we are in. Not one of them wants to leave the job half done.

[brianbwb-2009]

to s1ckd09,

This blogsite is limited to 1500 characters, it would take at least a book to list them all, but just one; since all the so-called hijackers had Saudi passports, (which also may have been a lie, how could all have survived the flames for them to know) why go bomb Afghanistan? You say because Bin Laden (himself a Saudi) was there?

If they know at all where Bin Laden is, or was, why couldn't they capture him? They found Saddam in a hole under a house in the desert, but Bin Laden goes on TV more often than the Undertaker, but they still can't "find" him.

[brianbwb-2009]

to Toolmangler,

Especially if his name is Bush.

As for Belcher, he simply doesn't want to admit that he messed up big time, the big brave soldier is afraid of the consequences.

Lying is not the exclusive trait of any one culture, or ethnicity, nor is the cowardice that makes people hide behind them, or the self delusion that rationalizes senseless murder.

[s1ckd09]

to brianbwb...

I would like to know which "lies" the president told for us to be over in Afghanistan.

[toolmangler-2009]

"If we knew that there were children inside the building, there was no way that that air strike would have occurred," said Sgt. 1st Class Dean Welch, another coalition spokesman.


Come on, dude, I know children who can lie better than that.
Posted by brianbwb at 08:57 AM : Jun 18, 2007


The only people that tell the truth, wear turbans, RIGHT'?
I guess that if he is an American and his mouth is open, then "He is lying" 'RIGHT'?

[brianbwb-2009]

to Toolmangler

It doesn't escape notice that simply getting our people out of there immediately, because they have no business being there is not an option for you.

Also the fact that we are bombing anyone there for no reason at all is lost on you.

As far as can be surmised by your posts, we are just over there killing because we are over there killing, and when they resist, we should kill even more, and as you yourself state, you don't even care why.

Such thinking is officially termed sociopathic, get some help...

[drudge2]

Mr. Bush's "war on terror" is based on the world view that other people should be like Gandi and use non violent means to resist our aggression. So the logic is that if we stomp on someone and they then resort to the use of terror against us, we were justified in stomping on them in the first place.

[brianbwb-2009]

to ToolMangler,

Part of our problem is that too many think like you, and don't care how we got there, or why.

If you theoretical son or daughter caught a bullet in the head over there fighting because of lies by the "president", I hope you would demand more than just for "the courts to settle it", especially when the courts are packed with the friends of the liar that sent your loved one there in the first place (thank Gonzo).

[toolmangler-2009]

suppose you will say next that the children could have been smuggled in underground...
Posted by brianbwb at 09:34 AM : Jun 18, 2007


Yes, thank you for adding that, now I don't have to I also want you to go into each building and search out all civilians and usher them out of the targeted building before we "Blow the h**l out of it! I will give you 15 minutes to clear the kids out.
sshheeeeesshh!!!

[brianbwb-2009]

to barbaraf4,

President Pelosi could very well turn out to be, for all intents and purposes, the same puppet as Bush, but at least we establish that Bush and his cronies are not above the law.

Maybe then Ms. Pelosi and others would bear that in mind...