Comments on: Navy Flexes Its Muscles In Persian Gulf

U.S. Forces Stage Military Maneuvers; Denies Reports Iran Fired Missile At A U.S. Ship In Persian Gulf

Add a Comment See all 95 Comments
by zootallures2 March 27, 2007 9:29 PM EDT
Air, Water, Food, Shelter.... and WAR?
Reply to this comment
by migrainegram March 27, 2007 9:25 PM EDT
Don't blink or you'll miss King George sneak into Iran through the back door.
Reply to this comment
by opfor311 March 27, 2007 9:12 PM EDT
dirtydog55,

While the unit Bush served in had a waiting list of about 100 at the time, it was short of qualified pilots (which Bush was).

Now Gore, on the other hand, while he was in Vietnam, was a E-4 Army Journelist with an E-5 bodyguard. The high command in Saigon wasn't about to let the son of an important Senator get scratched, so Gore didn't see too much action.
Reply to this comment
by zootallures2 March 27, 2007 9:06 PM EDT
The towers and pentagon were hit by missiles or bombs. The news media either faked the footage or someone jammed the satellites. The planes were either fake from the drill being run or who ever attacked, shot the planes down. The parts and pieces of planes were either planted or dropped from shoot downs.

A MiG 56 and also the B2 can be made invisible in blue sky. Supersonic missiles make no sound and are nearly invisible. A sunburn type missile sent down through the top of the towers into the basement would have the same effect. And explain the burned cars, squibs, and the rising explosion would disintegrate that top section. Building 7 hit deep in the basement would have most of the center gone and not take much demolition to 'pull it', or they were delayed action for maximum death toll. These missiles can wipe out an aircraft carrier.

A whole plane cannot pass through steel and concrete like a ghost. Planes cannot vaporize. They weren't solid steel, nor going 100,000 mph.
The collapse was not only to fast to be a pancake theory, but maybe too fast to be a controlled demolition.

Some guys swinging on monkey bars in the desert could not pull this off. Only 2 counties have the technology. US and Russia. No one else.



Reply to this comment
by dirtydog55 March 27, 2007 8:59 PM EDT
opfor311 said: "Actually, Bush did serve in the military. Driving F-102's took a lot of guts...after all..."

Going to Vietnam took a lot more guts...after all... Most of us did it, whether we wanted to or not. Bush served, yes, but then left when he didn't feel like serving any more. Most of us didn't have that option because we didn't have an influencial daddy (or mommy).

...after all...we didn't have the backing and influence of a wealthy, powerful family.

...after all... the Texas guard unit that Bush's daddy got him into had a waiting list of over 100 people, and Georgie was given 'head of the line' privileges.

Hmmmm...I guess, after all, it's who you know and not who you blow. I mean, what's Monica doing these days? No sarcasm intended...LOL.
Reply to this comment
by dirtydog55 March 27, 2007 8:50 PM EDT
Even the staunch repugnicans are saying the "using military force to create democracies" around the world is not a good foreign policy.

Reply to this comment
by opfor311 March 27, 2007 8:49 PM EDT
dirtydog55,

Actually, Bush did serve in the military. Driving F-102's took a lot of guts...after all, they didn't call them Dirt Darts for nothing. The F-104's were the only fighters of that time that had a worse reputation for being widow-makers..... SARCASM Now being a army journalist and a Senator's son, that was a piece of cake job..... END SARCASM
Reply to this comment
by dirtydog55 March 27, 2007 8:41 PM EDT
"We have a lib here going back to Hitler and Napoleon. LOL." Posted by thgdriver

Haven't you been paying attention? We refer to Bush as 'Napoleon' and sometimes as 'Hitler.'

Actually Bush, due to his aversion to actually serving in the military, could never hold a candle to Napoleon's achievements as a military commander. So, other than Waterloo, it's an insult to Napoleon to compare him to Bush.

Bush's Waterloo will be Iraq.




Reply to this comment
by musty2u March 27, 2007 8:37 PM EDT
This is beginning to look better already. From simulated to actual is a very small step. Rock on!
Reply to this comment
by opfor311 March 27, 2007 8:30 PM EDT
Hopefully the execrises go safely. Our prayer are with you all in the Stennis and Eisenhower Battle Groups.

Fair winds and following seas.

Bravo Zulu.
Reply to this comment
by dirtydog55 March 27, 2007 8:29 PM EDT
"Remember, Hillary rolling her eyes in the joint session of congress after 9/11?" Posted by gfox67

Yes, I do. She was thinking, "Oh, *****!! Bush is going to blame this on Iraq!"

Lo and behold...

ROFLMMFAO!!!
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver March 27, 2007 8:22 PM EDT
Chezzzzzz, I catch hel! from the libs if I only go back 6 years to Slick Willie. We have a lib here going back to Hitler and Napoleon. LOL.
Reply to this comment
by randalds March 27, 2007 8:18 PM EDT
Hey Saddam!! You better get the welcome mat out down there, you are about to get a lot of company.

Posted by thgdriver at 05:11 PM : Mar 27, 2007

And someday they'll all be joined by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. I'm sure Satin has prepared a very special place for them.
Reply to this comment
by down-ndirty March 27, 2007 8:12 PM EDT
pwrslm said: "We know Saddam had them. The WMD were there."

Yes, indeedie! Reagan and Rumsfled gave him helicopters so he could drop the WMD (gas) on the Kurds and the Iranians. And then Reagan and Rumsfled gave the Iranians arms (Iran/Contra) to kill Iraqis. Any other WMD he might have had was an incomplete WWII-type atomic bomb and he got those plans off the internet (provided by the U.S.). That incomplete bomb was destroyed during the Gulf war.

Rumsfled knew in 1984 that Saddam had WMD and DID NOTHING about it. Rumsfled didn't even say anyting until the Gulf war.

You Napoleonic chauvinists only know what you want to know, or what your lying leaders want you to know. I have to admit, you're good little repugnicans, following your leader just like the nazis followed Hitler without question, without doubt. Just like Chauvin followed Napoleon. You repugnicans are good at playing dumb, like it comes naturally to you.

Keep following your lame duck Napoleon. He's down to about a half a 'quack' left. ROFLMMFAO!!


Reply to this comment
by thgdriver March 27, 2007 8:11 PM EDT
Hey Saddam!! You better get the welcome mat out down there, you are about to get a lot of company.

Hey Satan, I know you'll be smiling when they get eleven tons of hot coals instead of the eleven wives they were expecting. ROFLMAO!
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver March 27, 2007 7:57 PM EDT
Dam^, where have you all been? I am usually out here alone going toe to toe with the fool liberals.


I hope the libs all remember it was the pirate action of the Iranians who started it.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver March 27, 2007 7:49 PM EDT
The Iranians are a silly bunch of fools. They have Two nuclear carriers off their coast with all the back up power needed. I figure their navy will last about one hour toe to toe with us. I am sure there are 1 or 2 atomic subs in the area also.

If they keep up their bull shi!. Those towel heads are going to learn the hard way not to ***** with us.
Reply to this comment
by gfox67 March 27, 2007 7:48 PM EDT
PROUD to be an AMERICAN!!! Proud of our Men and Women serving our Country!!! You have accomplished far more than the media give you credit for!!!

If we listened to the spineless jellybelly liberals we would lay down our arms and hand over our country to the first Terrorist that tried to take over!!! Do you see any among the liberal ranks that you would trust to protect your family?

Remember, Hillary rolling her eyes in the joint session of congress after 9/11? SHE HAS NO CONCERN FOR THIS COUNTRY... only to fulfill her goal!!!
You would have to be insane to vote for such a terrorist lover!!!
Reply to this comment
by navychief8 March 27, 2007 7:23 PM EDT
I served in ANTIETAM from 2000 - 2004. She is an awesome ship made so by an awesome crew. She will be up to any task given!
Reply to this comment
by rf35 March 27, 2007 7:22 PM EDT
Call me a chauvinist, but the Muslim world has shown its true colors and there is nothing for it. They made it clear it's either us or them. I vote for us. How about you.
Reply to this comment
See all 95 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (298 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: