Comments on: Scholars Dismiss Jesus Documentary

Film Claims Bones Found In Jerusalem Tomb Are Those Of Jesus Christ

Add a Comment See all 685 Comments
by mitywhity February 26, 2007 1:12 PM EST
We'll just know for sure one day when this body dies, won't we? I believe this is not conclusive and is very speculative. It's strange how that when they found an ossuary bearing the name "James, brother of Jesua" they IMMEDIATELY scoffed and expended much energy to prove it was bogus. They never did prove it wasn't actually Jesus' brother. The point is this: this world just doesn't simply not like Jesus or disbelieves in Him - they HATE Him and everything He stands for. They HATE everyone who believes in Him and secretly wish that is was legal to kill us all off. The only thing that holds them back is fear of imprisonment. The spirit of antichrist is growing stronger in this world. This "expose" doesn't come as a surprise. In 1980 it would have been banned from network TV. They have waited 27 years to tell this. Why? Because they had to wait until the collective morality in this country was at a low enough level. All the atheists will erupt in ecstatic antichristical euphoria and will try to use this to spread their anti-gospel and grow their membership. The only country left standing in the way of antichristical domination is the U.S. Only in the U.S. is the pulpit not censored. It's time we all decide what we believe and in whom we believe and prepare to accept the consequences. This Age's time is drawing to a close.
Reply to this comment
by IONO77 September 5, 2009 10:06 PM EDT
Martyrs are always looking to be persecuted... it's an easy way out of dealing with making this world a better place...
by tlordagama February 26, 2007 1:11 PM EST
Jesus was buried in a rock hewn tomb that belonged to Joseph of Aramathia who requested the body from Pilot. He was buried quickly because it was almost sundown because on the Sabbath nobody could do any work and the tomb was close by.
Anyone that reads the gospels is quite aware that Jesus was born in borrowed stable with a manger for a bed in Bethlehem... and buried in a borrowed tomb that was guarded by Roman soldiers until the day after the Sabbath. Then He rose from the dead and now is with His Father in Heaven. ( I would also add so is His Mother body and soul).
Reply to this comment
by tlordagama February 26, 2007 1:11 PM EST
Jesus was buried in a rock hewn tomb that belonged to Joseph of Aramathia who requested the body from Pilot. He was buried quickly because it was almost sundown because on the Sabbath nobody could do any work and the tomb was close by.
Anyone that reads the gospels is quite aware that Jesus was born in borrowed stable with a manger for a bed in Bethlehem... and buried in a borrowed tomb that was guarded by Roman soldiers until the day after the Sabbath. Then He rose from the dead and now is with His Father in Heaven. ( I would also add so is His Mother body and soul).
Reply to this comment
by IONO77 September 5, 2009 10:04 PM EDT
Funny thing is Historians do agree that there is enough historical information to indicate that a person by the name of Yeshua of Nazareth probably existed... and that he was cricified for disturbing the peace or some kind of heretical disturbance which is open to criticism... however there is little evidence of much in the New Testament... for one the example of Jesus being judged during the day of Passover in the book of Matthew contradicts the book of John where he dies on the next day... also the day of passover... so the writers of the gospel are conveniently creative... truth is there is little archeological evidence for most of the tenets in christian or any religion for that matter... miracle is miraculous for that same reason... it is legendary and mythical and fantastical... so let's leave theologians to descuss spirituality... and historians and archeologists...as well as documentarians to do what they know best find the nagging details... where they say the devil is in the details... god likes to brag about generalities...
by dogsoul February 26, 2007 1:08 PM EST
Tucker, the historical accuracy of a man named Jesus who was claimed to be the Messiah, King of the Jews, etc & was put to death by crucifixtion is substantiated by Roman historical documents; granted, they don't claim any more than that - but while many disagree as to Jesus' supernatural status - whether or not he at least existed as a man is relatively accepted as verified.
Reply to this comment
by tuckerndfw February 26, 2007 12:57 PM EST
Funny how bible thumpers usually claim any ossuary or coffin with the name Jesus or the names of his disciples is conclusive proof Jesus of the bible existed. And, was God.

But, now they claim the name Jesus was so common as to be meaningless. Which is the truth, but I'm sure they never meant to admit it.
Reply to this comment
See all 685 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Poll: Rush Most Influential Conservative

    (204 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: