Comments on: Iran Sends Mixed Signals
Ahmadinejad Remains Defiant, But Senior Nuke Negotiator Says Tehran Wants To Talk
Add a Comment See all 110 Comments
- PM Blair is pulling the British out of Iraq in a few weeks putting even more of a burden on the US. When does GW get the message the US can't do this alone, his buddy is even leaving him now? It's time to fold this bad hand, reshuffle the deck and deal a new one!
- Reply to this comment
- it's not about a l;ittle strip of land, hello!!!! It's about freedom and democracy versus a barbaric violent ideology. Once again Bluestardad is clueless.
Posted by notblue
Do you truly believe that our presence in Iraq is this altruistic? Do you really believe that once we show the Islamic's the true path that they'll renounce Islam? Wow, I want what you're taking! - Reply to this comment
- are you independently wealthy? Do you have a J-O-B? Are you a hired hack? I see you in this site every single time I log on. And you go on to the point of nausia!
Posted by NavyChief8
I can't in good conscience let this stand. There are several people who post many times more than myself and others who are not in agreement with the Bush doctrine. However, you attack me. Sure, sometimes my words are strong, but you said nothing about lars008, lieberman181, notblue, bigwhtpony, singingrick and others. Each of those individuals post many more times than I do and their rants are never of substance.
If you think that I am not presenting a reasonable argument, please feel free to challenge me. However, you do not have the right to jump in and attack simply because you do not agree with my politics.
I totally disagree with what is happening to our country and I fully intend to be heard. Within just the past year several million American citizens have come to realize the truths taht I and others express here. The polls clearly indicate that.
You are simply another republican. - Reply to this comment
- tuckerndfw
another conspiracy nut........lol - Reply to this comment
- "response to that (9/11/01) is apparently to just sit on our *** twiddling our thumbs . . ."
. . .
"Iraq is #14 in the world in terms of oil production."
Posted by obiquital at 01:41 PM : Feb 20, 2007
There are many responses to crimes (events of 9/11/01) that do not involve invading other nations.
The only thing invading Afghanistan accomplished is oil companies have a new pipeline across W. Afghanistan to the brand new oil terminal in Pakistan.
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11/01.
China, Russia, France, Japan and others had contracts with Saddam to develop Iraqi oil fields when the sanctions were lifted. Before they could be lifted, ExxonMobil & British Petroleum (excluded under Saddam) ordered Bush & Blair to invent a reason to overthrow Saddam so they could get their hands on those oil fields.
Saddam also reportedly intended to price Iraq's oil in euro's rather than dollars. An idea, that if it catches on, will officially bankrupt the US. The US dollar's value is based on oil, not gold.
The rest is history.
Iraq's production is irrelevant. Iraq's reserves (2nd largest in the world) is what oil companies wanted to control. And, now ExxonMobil and British Petroleum control those reserves.
And will continue to control them now that US & UK taxpayers were stupid enough to finance their hostile takeovers.
The US & UK do not historically invade other nations to overthrow dictators or "free" anyone. And, we still have not done so. - Reply to this comment
- The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life. Theodore Roosevelt
- Reply to this comment
- notblue........... exactly.....
One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Winston Churchill
Edmund Burke: All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing.
USA's PLEDGE 2 THE WORLD GIVEN BY JFK!!
"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty."
--John F. Kennedy, Inaugural Address, Jan. 20, 1961 "
"Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country." --John F. Kennedy, Inaugural Address, Jan. 20, 1961 " - Reply to this comment
- are you independently wealthy? Do you have a J-O-B? Are you a hired hack? I see you in this site every single time I log on. And you go on to the point of nausia!
Posted by NavyChief8
Yes, no, no and kiss my a$$ lieberman. - Reply to this comment
- If we were to abandon the middle east to the radicals the price eventually payed in lives and dollars would make our sacrifice now seem miniscule.
- Reply to this comment
- It's not about a l;ittle strip of land, hello!!!! It's about freedom and democracy versus a barbaric violent ideology. Once again Bluestardad is clueless.
- Reply to this comment
- "A report in the British media says two things could trigger a U.S. attack on Iran: evidence that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon, or a "high-casualty" attack against American forces in Iraq that could be traced directly to Tehran"
Three things really. #3 would be Bush, Cheney, and Halliburtin wanting to take over the world for its oil. Just wanted to save the conspiracy lunes in here the trouble of having to type it. :) I'm here for ya'll. - Reply to this comment
- dallison7,
are you independently wealthy? Do you have a J-O-B? Are you a hired hack? I see you in this site every single time I log on. And you go on to the point of nausia! - Reply to this comment
- Media do people from the Middle East pay you to cover these Animals? What possible concern does this little strip of land smaller than most State parks in America mean to Americas nationals interest? Why would America care about Syria, Palestine, Lebanon or the Entire Middle East? 50 years we have invested in blood, and money in an effort to give these animals civility, they do not want it. Get out of the Middle East. Quit Covering it in the media and let it go up in flames off camera. If your neighbor keeps burning their barn down after sometime you will quit helping them rebuild it. Leave the Middle East alone and let them kill each other and burn. They are not worth one more American dollar or life!
- Reply to this comment
- so i guess these were lies too than haji....
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 - Reply to this comment
- America has paid for the entire Middle East for the last Fifty Years in Lives, Blood and Tax Money and this investment has brought us the Chaos we have today. It is time to look at Americas own problems and let these animals kill each other! The Middle East has been fighting since the Sons of Abraham, Ishmael and Isaac were born. Americans come home and let the Middle East be Isolated! The entire Middle East is not worth one more American Life or Dollar!
- Reply to this comment
- Why shouldn't Iran defend it self from you hateful, swindling, murdering, sadistic, loonies? It was fun, huh? I don't see you are so proud and arrogant now that the fruits of your society are in your faces. You blew up your own buildings, killed your own citizens with your "be bad" and "have a nice day, he he he" bull. I'm ashamed to look at most of you. Get Ron Paul for president or rot in hell... fo real fools!
- Reply to this comment
- trea7son
1. the offense of acting to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.
3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery. - Reply to this comment
- But, of course, the flat-liners who still blindly follow these criminals will never concede to the truth.
Charge one...thrown out...haven't stipiulated to anything specific...
Charge 2 thrown out...Cia operative was not undercover....it was common knowledge that she was CIA...Armitage was first offender...Stae Dept guy but it wsas known she was CIA..
3 charge 3 thrown out...no specific charges..
Posted by golfkt - Reply to this comment
- Charge one...thrown out...haven't stipiulated to anything specific...
Charge 2 thrown out...Cia operative was not undercover....it was common knowledge that she was CIA...Armitage was first offender...Stae Dept guy but it wsas known she was CIA..
3 charge 3 thrown out...no specific charges.. - Reply to this comment
- treason
noun
1. a crime that undermines the offender's government
Multiple lies were told by the administration to congress to obtain a favorable vote lead our country into an illegal war which seriously undermined the credibility of the United States with the other nations of the world.
2. disloyalty by virtue of subversive behavior
Bush/Cheney Inc. fabricated intelligence pertaining to an attempted purchase of 'yellowcake' uranium by Saddam from Africa. The story immediately proved to be false. Not only did they persist with their false claim, they took revenge on the person who exposed them by outing his wife, a CIA operative... causing untold harm to the security of the nation.
3. an act of deliberate betrayal [syn: treachery]
The acts of this administration are obviously deliberate.
SO, TREASON BY ANY DEFINITION!!
But, of course, the flat-liners who still blindly follow these criminals will never concede to the truth. - Reply to this comment
