Comments on: U.S. And Iran Fighting Proxy War In Iraq

President Says U.S. Will "Respond Firmly" If Iran Escalates Military Actions In Iraq

[frankly6]

Iran and Al Qaeda are the only two winners in this war so far. Heck of a job there Bush.

[emtak1]

two stories you should read:

1)http://www.cctv.com/english/20070126/103942.shtml

@)
http://www.newsdaily.com/TopNews/UPI-1-20070125-22542600-bc-iran-missile.xml

[hillaryin08]

Here is another news flash: The Democrat war protesters have started to take it out on the troops!

I guess this is their way of supporting them by spitting on them and calling them names.

[feelfree1]

MoonBeam461,

Re: "ALL I CAN BEG FOR IS TO STOP THE LOSS OF LIVES...IN COMBAT WITH IRAQ...THE REST IS UP TO YOUR COUNTRY"

We're working on it.

It would be nice to see the boys and girls of Canada stop dying for nothing, and terrorizing the poor people of Afghanistan, as well.

[moonbeam461]

THANKS.....GRAZING GOAT

[moonbeam461]

ALL I CAN BEG FOR IS TO STOP THE LOSS OF LIVES...IN COMBAT WITH IRAQ...THE REST IS UP TO YOUR COUNTRY

[grazinggoat]

MoonBeam461
Walking-Lair can be impeached, but it's useless. Since the impeachment process would take at least two years, before a judge could decide to kick him out with dishonor. Since his term ends in two years, it's a lot of efforts and energy invested with no garantee he'll be proved guilty of the 'crimes' he did.

Political courage is lacking in the Democratic Party as well. They have not enough balls to go the down the impeachment way. Politically it could be damageing in case the Repukons pretended the Democrats are obstructing the good process of governing by Impeaching the President.

[j-whitman]

Good night all

[feelfree1]

MoonBeam461,

Re: "I NEED AN ANSWER TO A SPECIFIC QUESTION.......WHY CAN THE VOTERS IMPEACH BUSH OR AT LEAST STOP HIS PLAN.................."

We only hav 2 "major" political parties here, at best, and many members of both parties are deeply in the pockets and influence of big corporate greed, as well as Israeli "interests".

Our "opposition" party can not take a firm stand against the Bush puppet, because many of them are complicit in many of his crimes.

The Democrats will not risk the anger and vengence of the Jewish State. If Israel attacks Iran, the Democrat party will have little choice but to cheer the effort.

It is really up to the People to reclaim power.

We're working on it.

[j-whitman]

MoonBeam,,, My point is he's very impeachable, extremely so more than any President in our history,,, I don't understand why we don't if we are supposed to be a nation of laws.
. The only reason I see is either we are weak or we will nail him with these investagations so hard his own party will throw him out.

[moonbeam461]

you cannot help yourselves from electing idiots.......BUSH ....2 TERMS..........WAKE UP

[hillaryin08]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rOjmDsPg_s


HILLARY 2003: There is a very easy way to prevent anyone from being put into harm's way, that is for Saddam Hussein to disarm. And I have absolutely no belief that he will. I have to say that this is something I've followed for more than a decade. If he were serious about disarming, he would have been much more forthcoming. I ended up voting for the resolution after carefully reviewing the information, intelligence that I had available, talking with people whose opinions I trusted, tried to discount the political or other factors that I didn't believe should be in any way a part of this decision. I would love to agree with you, but I can't based on my own understanding and assessment of the situation.

HILLARY: With respect to whose responsibility it is to disarm Saddam Hussein, I just do not believe that, given the attitudes of many people in the world community today, that there would be a willingness to take on very difficult problems, were it not for the United States leadership, and I'm talking specifically about what had to be done in Bosnia and Kosovo where my husband could not get a Security Council resolution to save the Kosovar Albanians from ethnic cleansing. And we did it alone as the United States, and we had to do it alone. And so I see it somewhat differently. So forgive me for my experience and perspective.

[moonbeam461]

A CANADIAN POINT OF VIEW......

HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT......

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

BUT NO DOUBT YOU WILL ELECT..........

[j-whitman]

Hillaryin,,, Wasn't Clinton President & General Clark who finally solved the issue of Kosavo with NATO ??

[moonbeam461]

How is he impeachment proof.....Explain

[j-whitman]

MoonBeam,, Impeachment, is a good question, many of us are wondering why we don't also,,, Probably our democrats are weak & don't think they can, I dissagree -
- We should impeach him, but, that will take over a year. It would show other countries a democracy actually works & help to restore our National Security.

[fleshmonger6]

WOW! D-A-R-N is a bad word??? Now that is news to me... hehe

[fleshmonger6]

So I guess we will just sit around and talk about how those *** Iranians shouldn't be amassing influence through the distribution of weapons and that they should settle down and just let the U.S. government do that. What is good for the goose is always good for the gander if you truly believe in equality and if you don't, then why complain about someone else practicing the same form of pick and choose ethics that you're supporting??? I think the point here should be that NO ONE should be doing that... Including our government.

[hillaryin08]

HILLARY 2003: There is a very easy way to prevent anyone from being put into harm's way, that is for Saddam Hussein to disarm. And I have absolutely no belief that he will. I have to say that this is something I've followed for more than a decade. If he were serious about disarming, he would have been much more forthcoming. I ended up voting for the resolution after carefully reviewing the information, intelligence that I had available, talking with people whose opinions I trusted, tried to discount the political or other factors that I didn't believe should be in any way a part of this decision. I would love to agree with you, but I can't based on my own understanding and assessment of the situation.

HILLARY: With respect to whose responsibility it is to disarm Saddam Hussein, I just do not believe that, given the attitudes of many people in the world community today, that there would be a willingness to take on very difficult problems, were it not for the United States leadership, and I'm talking specifically about what had to be done in Bosnia and Kosovo where my husband could not get a Security Council resolution to save the Kosovar Albanians from ethnic cleansing. And we did it alone as the United States, and we had to do it alone. And so I see it somewhat differently. So forgive me for my experience and perspective.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rOjmDsPg_s

[moonbeam461]

YOU DIDN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION.......