Comments on: U.S. Will Confront Iran In Iraq, Bush Says
Effort Aimed At Reducing Tehran's Growing Influence Among Shiite Militias
- Guess this puts paid to your favorite Republican outside of Hagel - the Jooz baiting, Oil guzzling opportunistic Von Ribbentrop clone known as James A$$ison Baker.
He wants to negotiate with Iran. Fine, we can send him, Carter, Hagel and Webb there and they can stay there permanently. We don't need them.
So next time you fascist babies cry Neo-Com and Halliburton, just remember your buddy Baker who wants us to talk to those who would kill us, and who is willing to whitewash any America-hating regime, even those who murdered American citizens over Lockerbie - just as long as he gets paid.
So hypocritically spew on Cheney while you busy kissing Baker's anal cavity, bozos. - Reply to this comment
- and now sit down, shut up, and let this new plan go ahead. IF IT DOESN'T WORK, fine we start pulling out - but we make *** sure that the enemy pays the ultimate price ... they won't be in any condition to influence any government left behind in Iraq.
And if Iran wants to start up, terrific. We can finally do to them what your hero - that little coward, bigot and liar Carter failed so miserably to do so over 27 years ago. And what would have prevented Islamohitlerism from spreading as it did.
Turning Tehran into a radioactive paved paking lot.
Gonna cry, libs - or scream "chickenhawk" - fine, it's time you either put up or shut up. or go live with the cockroaches. - Reply to this comment
- *** well about time. Any Iranian caught inside Iraq with no legitimate reason - and that should be most of them should be dosed with gasoline and set on fire.
That would be a clear-cut message to Ahmedinejedad that from now on any Americans killed will resort in any number of Iranian and Al Qaeda operatives being rendered the same.
Now, you lib crybabies and the real fascists out there, care to cry Abu Gharib or Gitmo - after today's news of murdered innocent pets and GIs tortured and killed, it might be a good idea if you shut your fascist mouths - and urged a swift victory - with nukes if necessary.
Don't like it. Tough Sh*t. You prefer future 9/11s instead... - Reply to this comment
- Fascist are UNBELIEVABLE!! Are there creatures on this planet dumber than they are? Here we are nearly 4 years into a War that was SUPPOSED to take 6 months over Weapons that NEVER existed and they just keep buying the garbage. Just yesterday Old *** the Quick Cheney said things were JUST fine in Iraq and we were making progress. The failure he said was the results of LIES by the "liberal" media. But then today Sir Lies-A-Lot comes out and say's things are bad because 150 or so guys from Iran are arming the bad guys, who Cheney says doesn't exist. WHO are the "Bad Guys"? Hummm Well they happen to be the MAJORITY of the folks of Iraq, the Shiite. So the folks who make up the MAJORITY are the bad guys and the folks who followed Saddam are the Bad Guys? Just exactly WHO the HELL are the Good Guys we're supposed to be fighting for? Man these guys would be a great show but who wants to laugh at this kind of Incompetence when it's the future of the nation at stake. All these Snake Oil Salesmen are doing is preparing the simple minded for the fall....the fact that they have YET AGAIN failed. Never told the truth and have yet to be successful but hey the People do not matter, Commission's of our best do not matter...it's all about Sir Lies-A-Lot and yet ANOTHER excuse! Pathetic!!
- Reply to this comment
- singindick works for CBS.
- Reply to this comment
- The FASCIST TAKEOVER of america WILL NOT STOP.
Get ready for ARMED RESISTANCE. - Reply to this comment
- The Emperor has no credability.
- Reply to this comment
- It's Friday - lay off for a while, relax and pick this *** back up on Monday, alright? Hvae agood weekend one and all!
- Reply to this comment
- Please, all you left wing genious's who think Bush is the idiot, tell us the new plan for success. We have heard the lets leave today plan, then what would the next few steps be?
- Reply to this comment
- And since Bushie has decimated the US military both physically and reputation, we are in real good shape to deal with this threat, aren't we Rick.
I never said Iran was not a threat, I said they were laughing at us. - Reply to this comment
- A parable for the Bush regime appaesers:
A stranger walks into a bar and shouts, "You guys are a bunch of wimps, and I can kick any and all of you *****!"
One of the bar patrons walks up to the stranger and punches him in the face. The stranager flies accross the bar, and collapses in a bloody pile.
The stranger then gets up, dust himself off, and shouts, "OK! Who's next? - Reply to this comment
- (Golly Shucks.. shrug shoulders) We aren%u2019t at war with Iran cause that would take a Legislative act. (Golly Shucks.. shrug shoulders) so we will just take on Iran in Iraq. There are some who, uh, feel like that, you know, the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is: Bring 'em on. We got the force necessary to deal with the security situation. (Golly Shucks.. shrug shoulders)
- Reply to this comment
- Actually, if we just left Iraq alone, the likely outcome would be a large war between Shiites and Sunnis involving most of the countries in the Middle East. The reason we used to support Iraq was to be a hedge against the Iranian shiites going to war against the Sunni Saudis.
Why should we care about a Middle Eastern holy war? Both sides would gladly sell us their oil to finance the internecine jihad. I think it would be foolish, but if they want to destroy themselves, who are we to stand in their way? We are like the police who intervene in a domestic disturbance and have the husband and wife both turn on them.
The truth is that our leadership is in a lucrative incestuous relationship with the Saudi monarchy. They turn a blind eye to Saudi terrorists blowing up the world trade center for the sake of profit. They occupy Shiite majority Iraq at the behest of Saudi Sunnis. Our brave soldiers are dying for the benefit of the repressive MONARCHY of Saudi Arabia, not democracy in the Middle East.
So lets end the sham and let the Arabs do what they please, come hell or high water. If they want to live in peace, great. If they want to fill their streets with blood, better their blood than ours. We are not the policeman of the world, and we ought to white our own sepulchres and pull the motes from our own eyes. - Reply to this comment
- ITS always this nonesence one hears. if we leave iraq,the war will end up being fought at home.Thats a ***&bull story.America is just exchanging blood for oil simple.THE MURDERER bush can take oil in a much simpler way like he does with saudi,s.He is just a common criminal.HANG THE RED NECK.lET US CONTINUE WITH OUR LIVES. come to think about it its better to get blow jobs in the U S than to slaughter ONE MILLION INNOCENT LIVES A YEAR.
- Reply to this comment
- GOOD
If Iran's agents' can kill American troops, then those same troops should, by all means, have the right to defend themselves and shoot back.
When I was in combat in the 1990's during Clinton's war (Bosnia), believe me, I shot back at anything that was shooting at me.
.......... - Reply to this comment
- Simple SANDY666 & RANDIE !! Have you people in the DNC cut off funding..If it is traitorist then it should be real simple to do..
Posted by FARTKNOCKER2 at 02:00 PM : Jan 26, 2007
Troll. - Reply to this comment
- I am sure Iran is shaking all over in fear. They are probably laughing in the halls of Tehran.
- Reply to this comment
- hey xevious4.....i happen to be a proud Christian Protestant and I do love the Jews.
- Reply to this comment
- The JINSA/PNAC Neocon cabal from AEI (American Enterprise Institute) to the Bush regime via *** Cheney's office is trying to widen the Iraq quagmire to include a war with Iran and Syria next in accordance with the 'A Clean Break'/war for Israel document which JINSA/PNAC Israel first Neocons Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser (who is still plotting more for Israel in Cheneys office) wrote as discussed on pages 261-269/321 of esteemed US intelligence author/writer James Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book.. Bamford's Iran: The Next War article for the August 10th, 2006 issue of Rolling Stone magazine is a must read as well. Simply Google 'Iran: The Next War' to find it.
- Reply to this comment
- "The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."
Theodore Roosevelt, President of the United States (R) 1918
TR is right. Bush works for us, not the other way around. He must do as WE say, not the other way around and it's time we fired the little SOB. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




