53 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dogsoul says:
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
reply
antoniof123 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dude you can cry all you want but if you look at the vote you will see only one GOP rep voted against the Iraq invasion, Ron Paul the rest voted and called us all terroist if we didn't vote with them.

No one believes a word otherwise.
dogsoul replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
...ooookay, and by that same logic - how many Dems voted in favor of the Iraq invasion?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dogsoul says:
And I won't let you forget all these Democrat Politicians who apparently lied to us too:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Reality-Checker says:
The distressing part to me has always been the character of our leaders who knew at the time before Saddam Hussien's execution, that our justifications to depose him were defective, and did nothing to stop the execution.

Saddam Hussien went out like a martyr to his followers and a villain to his opponents....much the same way any of our own leaders would go.

I think the lies of curveball will be paid for a hundred times over and will cost us dearly going forward. We blundered in the worst way known and still have arrogance about it, like only a country of savages can act.

I am totally flabbergasted: Anyone can lie to our leaders after a traumatic attack and send our country down a path to self-destruction.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RedWings_ninety_one says:
In other words: He is proud of leading the US into an unnecessary war to deter us from our other war which has let Osama bin Laden escape, and driven us into the deepest recession since the Great Depression.

Sounds about right.
reply
Irby32 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
this ^
RedWings_ninety_one replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lrby32,
what?
RedWings_ninety_one replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lrby32,
sorry, I am having kind of a slow day..I keep asking people what they mean when they reply to my comments and never realize what they actually mean until about 20 minutes later.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slappy_mcghee says:
You might want to ask that question to the military families who lost a member due to these LIES.
Reply to this comment

by bagdadshere9 February 16, 2011 1:47 PM EST
GAY__Is-back,look idiot,every family with a member serving in the military must be prepared for the worst any time.The US is always being attacked or involved in some conflict.Do you think that people enlist just to get their pay check and stay at home?

=====

Perhaps you missed the part about them being killed for the sake of LIES, baggie.
reply
slappy_mcghee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No, baggie - Bush dishonored those who died for his lies.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwassel says:
nottblu - since you are a fan of the "end justifying the means" argument, I assume you are an advocate for aborted fetuses' stem cells being used to cure life-threatening diseases for human beings?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rationall7 says:
Did the inspectors lie or did they tell the truth? Then if they were moving the mobile lab why didn't we see the movement from space?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
betterusa says:
"I tell you something when I hear anybody not just in Iraq but in any war (is) killed, I am very sad. But give me another solution. Can you give me another solution?" the newspaper quoted him as saying.
----------------------------------------------------------

Better take notice what just happened in Egypt. The citizens had the solution because they were not afraid to protest and possibly die trying for freedom from a dictator. Al-Janabi should face the families of the 4000+ that died and the thousands more that were injured, and convince them that is was okay to fabricate this story.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slappy_mcghee says:
by nottblu February 16, 2011 12:55 PM EST
Ever heard of the means justifying the ends?

=========

Yes, and that's not the case here.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nottblu says:
Hawksprings, that's way too much truth and fact for the leftwingers at these posts. They would rather believe politically motivated lies to promote hatred for a past president and fellow Americans who's opinions differ based on those same facts.
reply
2/3