9 Comments Add a Comment
- Add a Comment
-
- The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Though the boy scouts don't believe they are at fault or should be blamed for this act, they were in custody and care of the children and their responsibility to keeping harm from them.
Therefore any files they may have, secret or otherwise, should have been used to verify quality leadership. It does seem the boy scouts were negligent in the fact of the boy scout leader confessed to 17 other children and to still keep him leading a group of other children.
Homosexuality , should not be a problem here and that is not the argument here, because there is a fine line difference in Homosexuality and Pedophilia.
Oh come off it. I was a boy in Scouting in the late 70's and early 80's and there was no "open agression" against those people at that time. As for Scouts being against women, that's like saying the Girl Scouts are against men.
As far as the BSA being against gays, well think about it, where did most if not all of the volunteers that worked in Scouting come from? They were the PARENTS of the boys. At that time very few gays had children. More do nowadays. So why would there have been gays in Scouting then?
No doubt the verdict will be reduced on appeal, but the big problem here is BSA should have reported the Scout leader to the police as soon as they heard about the abuse. For that, they do deserve the verdict. But they don't deserve the verdict because of being white supremicists because they are not.