Even if he genuinely didn't know, the mere fact that he didn't know makes him guilty of dereliction and gross incompetence leading to the death of a Federal Agent. So either he knew and should be indicted for complicity to homicide, or he didn't know and should be indicted for negligence to homicide. What his own personal investigator happens to uncover about his own personal role here is frankly irrelevant.
Indeed, given the roles of the investigator and the investigated, I argue we should treat this report as if it were from Holders own Attorney advocate.
Yeah man, even if they kill people he just did it, I mean he didn't know anything about it. His guns, his money his operation, but of course he didn't know anything about it.
If this guy was Al Capone he'd be out cracking the Dom Perignon with his cronies right about now for beating a racketeering charge.
While no overt act of wrong doing by the Attorney General was found, there is an obvious insubordination of duty somewhere down the chain, which led to Terry's death. This is still negligent in terms of running a loose ship. If policies were tighter and command was more adhered to, Holder would have been more aware of what his people were doing and his command would have been more closely followed. If Holder didn't know what was happening, this just shows how disconnected he is from his post and unaware he was of the contempt for his leadership that apparently exists. How many other officers have to be put unnecessarily in harms way before Holder discovers and adequately assesses the extent of his loose ship and make the changes necessary to ensure the safety of American citizens and the Border Agents who protect us? I believe depraved indifference certainly applies in Holders case.
This is laughable. When I was audited by the IRS many years ago, the auditor turned out to be one of my clients. He told me that I had the right to request a different auditor. I graciously refused his offer and told him that I was comfortable with someone I knew. By now, you should have figured out my motive. This appears very similar. Of course, the mandatory sacrifice of underlings of Holder took place.
lets see how you feel if one of the US government supplied guns kills your family. Who cares what political background anyone has what they did was criminal. If it was a Repub Att. Gen you would change your mind. Anybody that blindly follows a political party is a nincompoop.
this is hilarious the Ig for the AG is saying the AG is innocent of wrong doing. Boy now that is an unbiased source. there were complaints that investigation by republicans was biased. This is no better. Facts will not come out. They simply threw other people to the wolves to try and avoid further investigation. If this was all there was to it why the executive privilege
Well, that criminal, Eric Holder, is quickly using up his lives a couple at a time.
Little if any chance he doesn't end spending his waning years in prison.
He better keep the secret files in a safe place because when he outlives his usefulness to CBS and their Democrat henchmen, not even the color of his skin will protect this sleazy criminal.
Holder's department investigated themselves and surprise, surprise- they threw a few underlings under the bus and Holder didn't know anything. Either he is stupid, deaf and dumb, out of touch or maybe just the head guy who is untouchable in the investigation.....
There were some comments about Horowitz being in Bush's administration, etc. Let's make an effort to TRY to look up the facts. He was a holdover in the CD after Clinton.
Horowitz started under Clinton. Below are links to both Holder's own account of Horowitz when he appointed him to the IG office MARCH 30, 2012 and to the Senate Nominations ... note there who provided recommendations for his appointment. March 30 ... How did he crank out an investigation in 6 months, brand new in his job? Amazing! http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/March/12-ag-408.html http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/nominations/112thCongressExecutiveNominations
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Indeed, given the roles of the investigator and the investigated, I argue we should treat this report as if it were from Holders own Attorney advocate.
If this guy was Al Capone he'd be out cracking the Dom Perignon with his cronies right about now for beating a racketeering charge.
I'm sure Arsonist Car Thief Insurance Fraudster Issa doesn't agree.
Time to set out on another fishing expedition.
Little if any chance he doesn't end spending his waning years in prison.
He better keep the secret files in a safe place because when he outlives his usefulness to CBS and their Democrat henchmen, not even the color of his skin will protect this sleazy criminal.
Horowitz started under Clinton. Below are links to both Holder's own account of Horowitz when he appointed him to the IG office MARCH 30, 2012 and to the Senate Nominations ... note there who provided recommendations for his appointment. March 30 ... How did he crank out an investigation in 6 months, brand new in his job? Amazing!
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/March/12-ag-408.html
http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/nominations/112thCongressExecutiveNominations
and no one died in Watergate