13 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
philmorew says:
Hmmm, I wonder if they could make a rail gun large enough and powerful enough to fire lead/steel encased used uranium rod segments into deep space thus making atomic energy plants a bit less unsavory. They could do it over an extended period using excess electricity electric plants generate during transitions from day to night energy consumption.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slightlyoffthewall says:
the navy has been very innovative--they're trying to convert to green energy too.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KansasCity-2012 says:
It's a little abstract for many to realize what life would be like on the receiving end of this weapon. Imagine yourself in a tranquil setting and hearing explosions 6 seconds apart. Even radars wouldn't easily detect an incoming barrage of these babies flying in, and if one actually did, there wouldn't even be time to decide what to say in your last prayer or final words. A retaliation order may not even get out if it had to be repeated through a chain of command.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jesus_to_ground_control says:
Particle-Ray Gun

Instead of accelerating a particle (projectile) in a strait line, it would prove more efficient to accelerate the kinetic energy of the projectile by spinning it on itself (using mobius config-wave amplification). Once the projectile has acquired the proper spin speed (kinetic energy) then powerful pulse magnetic fields redirect the spin towards one direction.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
Oh great, that is the only thing America is good at now, building weapons. We failed at banking and finance, failed at capitalism and democracy and failed at manufacturing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DF68 says:
Couple it with Sandia Labs's self-guided bullet technology and this railgun ammo might be very accurate.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2012/02/sandia-labs-self-guided-bullet-for-future-soldiers/
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BigBlivefromny says:
good luck withthis one. sounds like a lot of intangibles involved in its production. no explosives necessary to propel shell, but what if the barrell of the weapon itself explodes from forces involved!?
reply
luna2b replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rail guns don't have barrels, per se. That's why they are called "rail" guns. So they don't have the pressures involved with an explosive charge like a regular gun. That's what makes them safer. It's like a giant electromagnet. And rail guns have been around for years as experiments. Just not really powerful ones.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
myopinionpal says:
I would like to know why the Dept Of Defense have to tell the press about everything that they are making.During the cold war that was unheard of.
reply
John782011 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Actually during the cold war there was often news releases like these. The Rail Gun has been out there as a potential weapons technnology since the Reagan Star Wars program. There are times that programs that need a boost in congressional funding get more press to get popular opinion behind it.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notparicular says:
Sounds like interest technology. Wish I could get involved in the development team.
reply
John782011 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Kind of like javalin catcher, not many make it past tryouts let alone the apprenticeship program.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
username751 says:
With this technology, I could be to work in five minutes. Might take longer peeling me off the side of the building.
reply