20 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pickapeck13 says:
Yet again, people who have done nothing to earn it will reap money from the pockets from people who have done nothing to deserve it.
reply
karek40 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
agree and our court renders another faulty decision based on politics rather than logic.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
peacefulperson says:
More info please CBS. This article is pretty skimpy on real information about copyright and which works it affects.
reply
Filmguy870 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Word.. This is "journalism?" Sheesh...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dgunner says:
Most of the people who violate this law don't have the money to pay the fine and the US government doesn't have the money or won't allocate the money to build all the BIG prisons to lock everyone in for violating these copyright laws.In reality all they have done is wate a bunch of tax payers money and thier time.BFD!
reply
omega39-2009 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
But, but, but, there is always private prisons with non union workers funded by money borrowed from China.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jsf14 says:
I'm guessing, though the article does not bother to say, that this applies only to works that are copyrighted under a law in another country. In other words you cannot copyright Shakespeare';s works or the works by any other author or artist long dead. It would be useful to be reminded how long after the originator's death a copyright stays in effect.
reply
karek40 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apparently according to this ruling they can re-copyright forever. Your decendents will have to pay their decendents for the use of the material originally copyrighted by the long dead.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
B_Erhart says:
In the coming dystopia THIS will be irrelevant...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Filmguy870 says:
Does that mean I can copyright Silent Night? It's in the Public Domain, after all.....jus' sayin'...
reply
karek40 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
or the bible, its a best seller every year, lets re-copyright if you are say Pauls decendent.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
credibility2 says:
The U.S. Supreme Court made the right decision. Now if we could just stop all those smarmy registered copyright infringers from illegally copying materials, we'd all be fine. Biggest offenders are schools, colleges and universities, followed by church choirs, etc.
reply
rwsmith29456 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Just to mention that our church choir does NOT copy protected pieces.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ganguandaland says:
Simply put, the United States Congress passed a law that stated that if a work was copyrighted in its country of origin, it would be copyrighted here. The Supreme Court upheld the law.

We expect other countries to honor the copyright of US artists. Shouldn't they be able to expect the same level of respect from us?
reply
Lerianis4 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Agreed, mnagtwa. The fact is that WORLD-FREAKING-WIDE.... copyrights should be limited to 5 years, at most, after something has the copyright registered.
rwsmith29456 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree with ganguandaland. Copyright laws should be as universal as possible between countries and if it is copyrighted in another country it should be copyrighted here. I don't advocate that works that are TRULY in the public domain be copyrighted But because people SAY something is in public domain doesn't mean that it really is. And people that think copyright should be limited to a ridiculously short time are obviously not producers of copyrighted works, but users that want more for free at the expense of writers, artists and musicians, etc.
Filmguy870 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
5 years is not long enough... but life of the author plus 70 is way too long. Maybe there can be a happy medium?????
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bouillabaisse says:
The US Supreme Court has become a farce, siding with narrow business interests over the public good.
reply
karek40 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
YEP
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JimBurnell says:
This could have a devastating effect on Project Gutenberg.
reply
Scroll Left Scroll Right