13 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PyRO_sTEVO says:
When did we lose our common sense? Our Government, has allowed the invasion of 30 million criminals in direct violation of Article IV, Section IV of our Constitution. they force American tax payers to pay Billions to provide Welfare, Prison cells, Educate the invaders children, free medical care,massive document fraud, & are destroying our schools, hospitals, communities, culture while Robbing, Raping, Killing & Assaulting American Citizens WE ARE BEING INVADED! WAKE UP PEOPLE!
An education is a good thing.

step #1 http://******/oBuTUd
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NVT7lyNRZQ&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsH8xvjTAlo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Btj6IeOFkis&feature=player_embedded
http://immigrationcounters.com/
http://ojjpac.org/memorial.asp
http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/
http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty580.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muw22wTePqQ
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/02/immigration-costs-fair-amnesty-educations-costs-reform/
http://www.rense.com/general81/dtli.htm
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=41045
http://www.cairco.org/econ/econ.html
http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/003335.html
Every Non-representative including obama and holder are not upholding the oath of office! they swore to defend the Constitution! If these clowns were to do their job, this would all be a Moot point!
Anchors and their criminal parents go, period, you knew you were breaking the law when you crossed the border.
Next shut down any business hiring illegal labor. Oh and owners go to jail.
any better ideas? lets hear them!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PyRO_sTEVO says:
I come for visit, get treated regal,
So I stay, who care I illegal?
I cross border, poor and broke,
Take bus, see employment folk.
Nice man treat me good in there,
Say I need to see welfare.
Welfare say, "You come no more,
We send cash right to your door."
Welfare checks, they make you
wealthy,

Medicaid it keep you healthy!
By and by, I got plenty money,
Thanks to you, American dummy.
Write to friends in motherland,
Tell them come as fast as you can.
They come in rags and Chebby
trucks,

I buy big house with welfare bucks.
They come here, we live together,
More welfare checks, it gets better!
Fourteen families they moving in,
But neighbor's patience wearing thin.
Finally, white guy moves away,
Now I buy his house, and then I say,
"Find more aliens for house to rent."

And in the yard I put a tent.
Send for family (they just trash),
But they, too, draw the welfare cash!
Everything is mucho good,
And soon we own the neighborhood.
We have hobby--it's called breeding,
Welfare pay for baby feeding.
Kids need dentist? Wife need pills?
We get free! We got no bills!

American crazy! He pay all year,
To keep welfare running here.
We think America darn good place!
Too darn good for the white man
race.

If they no like us, they can go,
Got lots of room in Mexico
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RealiteBites says:
This is a tough one ...

There seems to be a huge divide in sentiment depending on whether a person's a citizen of a state that borders on Mexico. Like the people of Arizona seem to have immigration as a higher priority than people the country over as a whole, and they want more action done.

And Presidential candidates are the opposite - they tend to want to court the latino vote, which makes them want to be lax.

So the elephant in the room to the Sovereinty question is the underlying substantive policy agreement - which makes it a really loaded issue.

Also, it cuts both ways - like maybe Arizona wants to have the freedom to make their own tougher immigration laws. But on the other hand, by wanting immigration laws to be local, they would lose out on being able to access Federal funding to help out with enforcement.

And theoretically, what about if a border State decides they want to be lax? But then illegals migrate to other states who don't share a border with Mexico, who then has greater problems cracking down?

Tricky issue - purely on the Sovereignty question, if it were happening in a bubble and the underlying substantive issue weren't part of the equation (when in reality it ALWAYS is), it would seem to clearly fall within the Federal domain (commerce, defense). But the Court doesn't work that way ... 66/33 I say they classify it as Federal ...
reply
RealiteBites replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
oops - mean to say the elephant in the room is the underlying policy DISagreement ... there seems to be a fairly big divide when it comes to the sense of urgency, and the degree of toughness to use in cracking down ...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
A state should not have to make such laws. THE FEDS SHOULD ENFORCE THE LAWS THAT ARE ALREADY ON THE BOOKS. The states are forced to take action because the Feds won't.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
saturn05 says:
Try going to Mexico illegally. If the U.S. isn't going to do anything about illegals, then let the states take care of the problem.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wolfmagic2012 says:
After Citizen's United, and before the right-wing balance gets tipped back, don't trust this kangaroo court to do anything that amounts to justice.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
civa57 says:
Scott Pelley used the words "strict" and "tough" to describe the illegal immigration laws passed in Arizona. Adjectives like these imply opinion on the part of CBS. Please report the news and keep your opinions to yourself, unless you are willing to provide a claim on air that some of the news you report is CBS opinion.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
username555-2009 says:
Gee, I wonder how Justice Sotomayor will vote on this decision. She has been cited on many occasions as being vocally against Arizona S.B. 1070. I doubt she has the moral fiber to recuse herself or rule on the facts, however.
reply
Well_You_Aint_Me replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not too worry Justice Elena Kagan will be recused. So that leaves only three Demo justices and five GOP.

Alito, Thomas Scalia, Kennedy, and Roberts may vote for AZ

Ginsberg, Sotomayor, and Bryer likely to vote BHO/Holder
bilrobi1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Will the Justice Kennedy recuse himself? He has very right wing leanings. I suspect that Justice Sotomayor has far more insight about this than you. Does a Supreme court Justice have be a Fascist at least in your clearlt limited little world? Would you feel better if Justice Sotomayor was named Jane Smith?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DenverBroncofan says:
All that should be reviewed is the implementation accross the nation
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
temple1962 says:
America needs to wake look out in the back yard and see complete strangers sleeping on the patio, dumping their garbage cans and defecating on sidewalk. This is what is happening to property owners and taxpayers in Arizona and it has nothing to do with RACE or IMMIGRATION!
reply
Scroll Left Scroll Right