Comments on: AP: House Wants CIA Docs on Hit Squad Plan
Sources say Agency Spent $1M on Secret Program, House Intel Committee to Probe Possible Oversight Violations
- I agree completely with you. Cheney should already be in jail for outing Brewster-Jennings.
- Reply to this comment
- You have a good common sense view on this issue.....good point
We learned our lesson in the past about revealing anything to the anti-american Democrat congress.......they leak like a bucket shot full of holes - Reply to this comment
- rharrin1,
I think he means somebody who won't hesitate to out our CIA agents and operations for political gain. Remember Brewster Jennings ... I think he means somebody showing his patriotism through 5 deferments during the Vietnam Era. - Reply to this comment
- All CIA agents have been compromised by this administration....everyone of them must second guess their job, because they know that this President and administration will prosecute them and reveal covert information at a moments notice, disregarding all of our nation's secrecy all for the purpose of using it against the opposition (republicans)....this puts EVERY agent in a compromising position, unable to do their job effectively, second-guessing every move, which in this business is deadly......Thanks, Barry and Leon...thanks for undermining this nation at every step
- Reply to this comment
- So, what's the big deal? The CIA has a plan to do something it didn't do, that had to be kept a secret, and they didn't tell Congress? Sounds like a good plan to me. I wouldn't tell Nancy P anything I wanted to keep from our foes, she's clearly out only for Nancy. She could care less about hard working Americans, she only cares about votes (and she's more than willing to misslead the public to buy them).
- Reply to this comment
-
- You have a good common sense view on this issue.....good point
We learned our lesson in the past about revealing anything to the anti-american Democrat congress.......they leak like a bucket shot full of holes
- What you two idiots fail to realize, is that this happened way back in 2001, when the REPUBLICANS had control of the house and senate - NOT the democrats. Are you saying that the white house didn't trust the republican leadership in both houses of congress?
Or that they just simply decided to ignore the constitution - AGAIN?
- You have a good common sense view on this issue.....good point
- pubsnomore
So you must think investigating a BJ is money well spent.
The problem is the democrats and people of this country have let the republicans slide on to many things going back to nixon reagan bush.
The only way to have them obey the law is MAKE THEM. - Reply to this comment
- by Joe_NY_15 July 15, 2009 10:02 AM EDT
it was so necessary for Panetta to reveal our classified programs.....just like it was SOOOO necessary for Obama to release classified CIA memos, (compromising agents in the field)......what is it, with the Liberals and Democrats hating agencies like the CIA ?
You know Panetta is a partisan hack, so why are you so surprise he dug some non-existing program out of the trash bin, to say 'LOOK, LOOK --->"
What CIA agents were "compromised in the field" because of those documents being released?!?!
You partisan hack!!
The ONLY thing that was "compromised" by those documents being released, was the Bush regime's credibility! And since he's a conservative, we already knew that was suspect anyhow! - Reply to this comment
-
- All CIA agents have been compromised by this administration....everyone of them must second guess their job, because they know that this President and administration will prosecute them and reveal covert information at a moments notice, disregarding all of our nation's secrecy all for the purpose of using it against the opposition (republicans)....this puts EVERY agent in a compromising position, unable to do their job effectively, second-guessing every move, which in this business is deadly......Thanks, Barry and Leon...thanks for undermining this nation at every step
- The CIA should have a hit list on all of this Nation's enemies. That is their task, to achieve National security with extreme prejudice. If this Nation's populace or elected officials believe that there are no longer any bad guys in this world who would attack Americans at home or abroad than do away with the CIA. Yes, do away with the CIA, NSA, FBI, the Army, Navy and Air Force as well as the Marines and Coast Guard - End of argument, END of ............
- Reply to this comment
- it was so necessary for Panetta to reveal our classified programs.....just like it was SOOOO necessary for Obama to release classified CIA memos, (compromising agents in the field)......what is it, with the Liberals and Democrats hating agencies like the CIA ?
You know Panetta is a partisan hack, so why are you so surprise he dug some non-existing program out of the trash bin, to say 'LOOK, LOOK --->" - Reply to this comment
- by Joe_NY_15 July 15, 2009 9:55 AM EDT
obviously because Penetta is a partisan Liberal hack, so he runs to the congress with anything that could be potentially embarrassing to the previous administration, like a tattle-tale child.....has he no honor to retain secrecy in the Central Intelligence Agency ??
Exactly what I expected out of you - stupidity, absurdity, and nonsense, all to cover for the conservatives in the Bush regime SH***ING all over the constitution. - Reply to this comment
-
- it was so necessary for Panetta to reveal our classified programs.....just like it was SOOOO necessary for Obama to release classified CIA memos, (compromising agents in the field)......what is it, with the Liberals and Democrats hating agencies like the CIA ?
You know Panetta is a partisan hack, so why are you so surprise he dug some non-existing program out of the trash bin, to say 'LOOK, LOOK --->"
- it was so necessary for Panetta to reveal our classified programs.....just like it was SOOOO necessary for Obama to release classified CIA memos, (compromising agents in the field)......what is it, with the Liberals and Democrats hating agencies like the CIA ?
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




