Comments on: House Rejects $700B Bailout Plan
Bill Designed To Rescue Wall Street Is Shot Down, Sending Dow To Record Point Loss
Add a Comment See all 1586 Comments
- (Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania %u2013 09/29/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama%u2019s lack of %u201Cqualifications%u201D to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he filed his Opposition and Brief to Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] Joint Motion to Dismiss in the case of Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg feels confident that he has %u201CStanding%u201D and the Court will allow the case to go forward. Our response was due in 14 days, but the Court requested our answer by Monday, September 29, 2008 and we complied.
In our response we set forth sufficient reasons that I have %u201CStanding%u201D to bring this lawsuit. Furthermore, I set forth additional reasons that indicate Obama does not meet the qualifications for President of the United States and Obama should be removed from the ballot and held accountable.
Our website obamacrimes.com has received 17.1 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website %u2013 and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, %u201Cwe%u201D the people, are heading to a %u201CConstitutional Crisis%u201D if this case is not resolved forthwith.
For copies of all court pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com.
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
- Reply to this comment
- Republicans blamed Pelosi''''s scathing speech near the close of the debate - which assailed Mr. Bush''''s economic policies and a "right-wing ideology of anything goes, no supervision, no discipline, no regulation" of financial markets - for the defeat.
"We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House," Boehner said.
Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the whip, estimated that Pelosi''''s speech changed the minds of a dozen Republicans who might otherwise have supported the plan.
The partisan politics MUST STOP!!! Our country is in GRIDLOCK.
Posted by txgrouch2006 at 12:16 PM
Republicans caught in yet another LIE -- updated report
Blunt told ABC News that only "one or two" Members could have been affected by Pelosi''s speech, adding "I think you don''t want to give too much blame to that speech." - Reply to this comment
- You can put lipstick on Obama and he is still a Muslim!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by CBSCensorsU
That''s good.... - Reply to this comment
- The democrats should throw away Bush and McCains Bailout.
Make a real democrat bailout for "we the people" they have the votes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by ghm1 at 12:08 PM : Sep 30, 2008
O, the dems screwed up fannie and feddie and they want no responcibility on the bail out. Dems on re-election don''t want to be tied to this ***. 40% dems voted no.. - Reply to this comment
- That amounted to an appalling accusation by Republicans against Republicans, said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the Financial Services Committee: "Because somebody hurt their feelings, they decide to punish the country."
And just five years ago in a New York Times interview, Frank resisted calls for closer regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
He asserted that these two were in no danger, and that more regulation would hurt their ability to provide "affordable housing."
Yah - affordable housing to borrowers who CAN''T PAY FOR IT - and who are now SHUTTING DOWN OUR ECONOMY thanks to the likes of BARNEY FRANK. - Reply to this comment
- Republicans blamed Pelosi''s scathing speech near the close of the debate - which assailed Mr. Bush''s economic policies and a "right-wing ideology of anything goes, no supervision, no discipline, no regulation" of financial markets - for the defeat.
"We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House," Boehner said.
Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the whip, estimated that Pelosi''s speech changed the minds of a dozen Republicans who might otherwise have supported the plan.
The partisan politics MUST STOP!!! Our country is in GRIDLOCK. - Reply to this comment
- The democrats should throw away Bush and McCains Bailout.
Make a real democrat bailout for "we the people" they have the votes. - Reply to this comment
- This shows what absense of leadership there is with Pelosi and Frank leading this charge.
Rep Frank needs to take ownership in this fiasco. His comments dating back as far as 2003 stating "these two entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not facing any kind of financial crisis," are to blame for this mess.
When will he admit culpability and stop blaming others? - Reply to this comment
- This ''''veto proof legislation'''' was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999[1]
Posted by bks59 at 08:51 AM : Sep 30, 2008
Funny, I just read that entry a few days ago. The "veto proof" words WEREN''T THERE.
Someone just added them recently. I WONDER WHO....
So what if Clinton vetoed it and his veto was overridden. Today he''d be able to say the measure passed over his objections.
But now he''s as dirty as the rest.
BUSH IS TO BLAME
AND CLINTON IS TO BLAME
AND BUSH IS TO BLAME
AND CLINTON IS TO BLAME
AND BUSH IS TO BLAME
AND CLINTON IS TO BLAME
AND BUSH IS TO BLAME
AND CLINTON IS TO BLAME
AND BUSH IS TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- I will vote against any of my Representitives who choose to vote for any bailout package. Upset from Northern Virginia. Who run the government big business or the people.
- Reply to this comment
Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy.
