Comments on: In IRS Protest, Pastors Back Candidates
Conservative Legal Group Fighting To Abolish Restrictions On Church Involvement In Politics
- I couldn''t agree more, mwestorca. In fact, here''s an article on this subject with specific scripture McCain has violated:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1067580/why_christians_should_be_ashamed_to.html?cat=75 - Reply to this comment
- gaelgirli shares the formal language used in original colonial charters. These charters were cloaked in religious terms, but were basically economic documents. The purpose of colonizing America was to exploit its resources. Since people of wealth and breeding did not have to suffer the privations of taming a land for agriculture, a work force was found in religious dissidents. This had the double good forture of ridding Europe of malcontents and giving them a way to occupy themselves to the financial betterment of Europe. Very quickly after these religious sorts had a few years in the sun, the crowns of Europe re-asserted themselves and religious freedom was once again imperiled.
- Reply to this comment
- As a Christian you cast your vote for the non-Christian McCain (never has been baptized you know), the fly-boy who risked expulsion from the Naval Academy to sneak out and party, the hard-drinking, foul-mouthed, high-stakes gambler. The man who dumped his faithful wife, had an adulterous affair, and, after his divorce, married a rich trophy wife. And because he SAYS he is opposed to abortion, you think he is pro-life? But he wants to solve world problems by killing people instead of talking through problems? And you''ll vote against the man who came from humble circumstances, worked hard, did well in school, rose to the top of his class, dedicated his early working years to helping the poor, is married to one woman, goes home to his family at night and plays a little basketball with friends instead of going to the *** tables in Vegas. Have you ever heard him curse? Have you ever heard of him being drunk in public? Have you ever heard of him running around on his wife? And he made an adult choice to become a Christian, was baptized, and had his children baptized. How can you explain this to God? He''s the one who is your brother-in-Christ, the one who lives a moral life.
- Reply to this comment
- Displeased, another public education casualty? Never in the history of America, has anyone been tortured to death for disagreeing with "the church."
Maybe you didn''t get that Maryland, Rhode Island, and Virginia are states in the US. There are 50 (not 57) and I can list more excerpts from the charters. I can also point you to proclamations of Thanksgiving Day, making it a religious holiday, for giving thanks to God (no, children not to the Indians!) for this great country. These proclamations started in the 1600s and continued - right up until and ncluding 2007. - Reply to this comment
- I don''''t support abortion but I have to allow the woman to make that choice for herself.
What kind support do you call this? - Reply to this comment
- It''s time to tax the income of all churches. I''ve long supported the separation of church and state even though I am a practicing Christian. Church leaders are emboldened by their influence over their congregations to influence the voting. But I have begun to see that church leaders are going so far as to extort the votes of the faithful by threatening the denial of communion or other sacraments. If the church wants to get into the game of politics, then it should pay taxes accordingly. But if that doesn''t happen, the faithful have a way of not giving as much when the donation plate skirts by. I know of many of my fellow parishioners who have given less as a result of political activism from the pulpit. If anything, church leaders are complicit to supporting bad leaders in the congress as well as the White House and are eroding any moral leadership the church leaders hope to maintain. Many of the christians I know will vote for candidates who are pro-choice because when it comes to these candidates'' support for the poor and underrepresented, these candidates truly show their compassion. I don''t support abortion but I have to allow the woman to make that choice for herself.
- Reply to this comment
- To aggiekat2004 who says, "I think ALL churches should have to pay taxes...And...when that law was written, the mega-churches didn''''t even exist. To give them tax exempt status is RIDICULOUS...The spirit of the law is being totally abused by these entities...and paying for these crooks to have their own jets and tour buses...it needs to be stopped."
This comment misses the point of churches which is ministry. The reason churches are tax exempt is because the IRS expects them to do things to benefit the community with that tax money to take the burden off the government.
Of course there are some bad seeds out there, but it''s really unfair to paint all mega churches in such a negative light. Especially if you have no experience with their ministries besides what you''ve heard and seen in the media.
For instance, my church is a mega church. However, our pastor is the most humble man you''d ever want to meet. He''s not out spending millions of dollars on himself or his family. Instead, there are over 80 ministries under his umbrella including Save Africa''s Children. This is where the money goes.
Save Africa''s Children is currently supporting more than 200,000 children who''ve been orphaned due to the AIDS epidemic in Africa. We''ve built orphanages all across the continent and made sure that they are properly staffed and supplied.
If our church was taxed as you suggest, there would be a lot more children dying and uncared for on the streets. I can''t see how this would be a good thing. - Reply to this comment
- .Any questions?!
Posted by gaelgirll
The documents you mention happened during a time when a person would be tortured to death if they disagreed with the church. We''ve outgrown that now. - Reply to this comment
- The Colonial Charter for the Maryland government closed with the requirement that "no interpretation of its contents should be allowed whereby God''s holy and true Christian religion might in any wise suffer."
The Colonial Charter for the Maryland government closed with the requirement that "no interpretation of its contents should be allowed whereby God''s holy and true Christian religion might in any wise suffer."
And the Rhode Island Charter, it directs the civil government to, here are it''s words, "to be in the better capacity to defend themselves in their rights and liberties against all enemies of the Christian faith." According to this charter the original government of Rhode Island was set up to protect the Christian religion.
The April 3rd of 1644 records of the Colony and Plantation of New Haven read, "It is ordered that the judicial laws of God, as they were delivered to Moses . . . be a rule to all the courts in this jurisdiction, in their proceeding against offenders . . ."
...Any questions?! - Reply to this comment
- I am a Christian. And I hope that the IRS watch this type ministries . Because it sound as if this man, Is Lording over its people. Instead of being a Minister of God. There are a lot of Kooks out there. And they having people doing Crazy things.
- Reply to this comment
International recording artist Shakira on love, career and more.




