Comments on: California Bans Texting While Driving

From 2009, Drivers Caught Sending Text Messages Will Be Fined At Least 20 Dollars

Add a Comment See all 49 Comments
by myopinion381 September 25, 2008 2:20 PM EDT
I have a friend who is 72 years old and he is dating a few 18 year old girls, he needs his text messaging all the time. Posted by spaceatoms at 10:52 AM

Please tell me you are kidding about the age of your friend. That is just gross for a 72 year old to date an 18 year old. They could be his/her grandchildren!
Reply to this comment
by birdlikebld September 25, 2008 2:18 PM EDT

'' .. they also banned the barbequeing of trillions dollars of nuclear biological chemical stealth ray war babys with government taxed funds; and, clearly: it has worked .. ''

Reply to this comment
by carlylaine September 25, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
honestabe8: Perfection...

This is so intrusive...my gawd what next? NO SNEEZING? cuz the eyes close...we can be a havin'' that.
Reply to this comment
by lewiston14 September 25, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
And you think a person without a DL makes them stop driving. What place are you from?
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 September 25, 2008 1:55 PM EDT
I find it amazing that they have to pass a law for this. Do they also have one about having intercourse while driving? Emailing?

Posted by honestabe8
----

They should'' plenty of those videos can be found anywhere -- and sadly Darwin had nothing to say...
Reply to this comment
by ethiopia93 September 25, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
I think the law should be even stricter and it should also be Federal Law. If you talk or text holding a cell phone you should be treated the same way as a drunk driver would be treated. Actually, I think even stricter b/c alcholism is an illness. People who hold a cell phone to their ear aren''t sick. They are just willfully evil and show a complete reckless disregard for the safety of others. The first offense should be 6 months of no driving. Second offense, a year without a license. Third time you never get a DL again. There is NEVER a reason to be talking or texting on a cell phone. If there is an emergency pull off the road and deal with it.
Reply to this comment
by observer2020 September 25, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
Since the no cell phone while driving law was passed in NJ, I have seen more police officers (driving in marked vehicles) on cell phones than the general public...and that''s saying something. But of course, police are above the law.
Reply to this comment
by honestabe8 September 25, 2008 1:10 PM EDT
I find it amazing that they have to pass a law for this. Do they also have one about having intercourse while driving? Emailing?
Reply to this comment
by lewiston14 September 25, 2008 1:05 PM EDT
"Guess the only difference is if they hit you while yakking, you can sue them for it...

Posted by Inventagod2

All you have to prove that the cell phone was the cause, Not an easy thing.
Reply to this comment
by inventagod2 September 25, 2008 12:55 PM EDT
We banned holding a cellphone to your ear while driving, but no one cared... Every other driver still has their cell in their hand.

Guess the only difference is if they hit you while yakking, you can sue them for it...
Reply to this comment
by lewiston14 September 25, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
"You''''ll need em'''' when some teenager runs through a red light and broadsides you while texting.

LOL while LAMO and ROFL

Posted by mecury69

mecury69: If you live you can take them for millions. Money may not be everything but just think how much confort you can have as they pay througt the nose everyday you go to the docs.
Reply to this comment
by lewiston14 September 25, 2008 12:34 PM EDT
There is no reason for anybody to text. I prefere face to face but a phone call can show emotion to. When I had a cell phone it did three things. It could send and receive calls and tell me what time it was. Not cameras no internet. I could access voice messages when I wanted to. From that time I got rid of my cell phone as I could not figure the cost vs the time I used it. I did not need a leash which is was becoming. I think people could trace me so I just turned it off and took out the battery. No more leash. Good for the parents that can afford $5000 or $10,000 a year on their kids 3000 text messages. When I cancelled my cell phone the gal on the phone went into panic mode. What would I do without a cell phone. My answer was simple the same thing I did before cell phones and before she was born. I hope they know how to walk when their battery is dead and remember what you can do with a quater. Cell phones have to be one of the greatest scams in history. Oh dont call me I wont answer because its always people wanting something.
Reply to this comment
by mecury69 September 25, 2008 12:20 PM EDT
"Gee I hope they dont ban saying the rosary behind the wheel. I often do this because there is just so many hours in the day.

Posted by gop_will_win at 09:10 AM : Sep 25, 2008"

You''ll need em'' when some teenager runs through a red light and broadsides you while texting.

LOL while LAMO and ROFL
Reply to this comment
by mecury69 September 25, 2008 12:19 PM EDT
"Obama is a liberal idiot.

Posted by howzilla"

Please post your educational and professional qualifications so we can have a gauge as to the weight of your ''opinion''.
Reply to this comment
by usclimey September 25, 2008 12:14 PM EDT
Can anyone tell me what the advantage of texting is for grown-ups? Unless you want to "talk" to a friend in class without the teacher knowing, I really don''t see one.
Reply to this comment
by gop_will_win September 25, 2008 12:10 PM EDT
Gee I hope they dont ban saying the rosary behind the wheel. I often do this because there is just so many hours in the day.
Reply to this comment
by tootall10142 September 25, 2008 12:05 PM EDT
I GOT BEHIND A ROLLING TEXTER YESTERDAY.I FOLLOWED HER TO THR GROCERY STORE AND EMBARRASSED HER IN PUBLIC ON THE POINT OF ENDANGERING THE LIVES OF CHILDREN IN HER CAR. THIS CONTINUED UNTIL THE MANAGER ASK ME TO LEAVE.IM SURE SHE WILL CONTINUE TO TEXT AND DRIVE BUT SHE WILL REMEMBER FOR A LONG TIME IM 6-4 245LB. CHEROKEE INDIAN,IM PROBABLY LUCKY SHE WASNT PACKING A GUN OR DIDNT USE IT.BUT ILL SACRIFICE A LITTLE JAIL TIME IF IT SAVES HER CHILDREN FROM GETTING KILLED. IM JUST OLD STUPID AND CRAZY THAT WAY.
Reply to this comment
by lewiston14 September 25, 2008 11:46 AM EDT
Which part is stupid and not true?
Reply to this comment
by platteman September 25, 2008 11:35 AM EDT
Forrest was right. You can''t fix stupid.
Reply to this comment
by lewiston14 September 25, 2008 11:34 AM EDT
install signal jammers in every vehicle that prevent cell phone usage inside the car.

Posted by thamlett

Anything installed can be removed. Think of the huge battle between cell phone companies and car companies. Not to mention you may be in a parking lot noe even moving and a car company is going to block your cell phone. Goog luck trying to sell that brand. People have a nasty habit they do not like being told what to do. Dont like on star a simple swat with palm of hand on the antenna and it wont be talking across the street.
Reply to this comment
See all 49 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (478 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: