Comments on: Bush, Lawmakers Rush Forward Bailout Plan

Agreement On Some New Terms Signals Movement In Talks Between White House And Congress

[nextgenman]

taking care of yourself is a success, having government take care of you libs is a failure

Posted by jamesm12341 at 03:06 PM : Sep 22, 2008
----------

HAHAHAHAHA!!!! Our wittle Republicans are support socialist bailouts now!

[splainin2do]

Actually, the best question is why did anyone think a guy who called himself an oilman who never found a drop of anything liquid that had not been distilled was qualified to be President?

[joker1944-2009]

WHRE''''S THE WMD''''S BLAH BLAH........

Posted by Waterboard at 03:01 PM : Sep 22, 2008

Maybe you think asking for accountability (to say nothing of the truth) from your government is something to be dismissed, but you''d be in the minority I think.

If a Dem had started the Iraq war and no WMDs ever turned up you conservatives would have been calling for his head. But seeing as Bush has an (R) after his name, you can joke about it and poke fun at anyone who asks for the truth.

Thank God you conservatives are a dying breed. The nation can''t stand much more of your idiocy and irresponsibility.

[txgrouch2006]

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps
/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0
Posted by Xyno at 03:05 PM : Sep 22, 2008

Would you PLEASE follow netiquette and POST A SUMMARY with the link as a reference, NOT JUST EXPECT EVERYBODY TO FOLLOW THE LINK???????????

[apostasyusa]

Republican = a stunning lack of competency.

Republicans hired Halliburton to run the rebuilding of Iraq. What did we get? A crumbling Iraq and TOO MANY dead Americans because Halliburton doesn''t now how to build showers THAT DON''T ELECTRICUTE our soldiers. Meanwhile the Air force generals get new leather chairs in their airplanes.

We can''t have our soldiers showering in safety in Iraq while our generals relax to death in their new chairs.

Republicans are sick people. Republican Americans should do America a favor:

Load it, put it to your head, then press.

[txgrouch2006]

Stupid Republican defenders of the crooked faith, can''''t hear the train is that is fixing to run over them.
Posted by BajaJohn1 at 03:04 PM : Sep 22, 2008

Democrat defenders can''t hear ME asking the question NO DEM CAN ANSWER - WHY DIDN''T CLINTON VETO THE 1999 BANKING DEREGULATION BILL?????????????????????

[waterboard]

Posted by jamesm12341 at 02:59 PM : Sep 22, 2008

Why is Bush so adamant about socializing WallStreet


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by nomcsame



HEY JAMES -- MY NAME IS NOMCSAME....I''M A LIBERAL. I HEARD SOMEONE ON HERE SAY THAT SINCE THE FEDS BAILED OUT THE COMPANIES, I''M NOW TYING THAT INTO SOCIALISM THAT YOU GUYS KEEP TALKING ABOUT.

I KNOW IT''S NOT THE SAME THING BUT I''M GONNA KEEP POSTING IT ANYWAY. IT MAKES SENSE TO ME SO I''M HOPING THAT THE OTHER LIBERALS ON HERE WILL AGREE WITH ME AND THAT WILL CHANGE THE ELECTION...

WHY DO THE FEDS BAIL OUT THE BAD ECONOMY WITH SOCIALISTIC PRACTICES?

WHY DO THEY DO THAT?


HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH


FUUUCKIN'' DUMMY LIBERALS

[ubrew12]

txgrouch2006 said: "WHY DIDN''''T CLINTON VETO THE 1999 BANKING DEREGULATION BILL??"

Because they all thought it was a good idea at the time. When, by 2004, it became obvious that two bubbles had been hatched (a housing bubble and a derivatives bubble), why didn''t Bush reregulate the banking industry? Why did he let it spin so horribly out of control?

[splainin2do]

Waterboard chose his screen name because the practice is the closest thing to experiencing drowning next to being an investment banker under Bush-McCain economic policies.

[xyno-2009]

The question NO DEM CAN ANSWER -

WHY DIDN''''T CLINTON VETO THE 1999 BANKING DEREGULATION BILL???????????

Posted by txgrouch2006 at 03:03 PM : Sep 22, 2008

============

Better question, why did the Dems block a bill that would have averted this entire mess???

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0