Comments on: No Charges Expected Against Ex-Rep. Foley

Former Congressman's Lurid Messages To Pages Was Subject Of Lengthy Investigation

[billarynfl]

First off, weren''''t the "teenagers" 18? Secondly, wwould someone please recount for us what Barney Frank did and explain why he is allowed to maintain his position in our government?HYPOCRITS

Posted by luvusa

Good point. It goes back to those different set of rules that libs get to follow, they don''t have to answer to any form of honesty or intefrity. What''s wrong for others to do is ok for libs to do, they are exempt from wrong doing in their eyes and the liberal biased medias eyes that give them a free pass. Take the fuss about the dems saying something a republican said was racist, although it wasn''t, but when the dems make an accusation it doesn''t have to be based on fact. Then at the same time they have an ex kkk leader on their payroll as a sentator. Typical liberal double standard complete with Typical liberal double talk.

[chefrc]

You are correct if you make one small correction in the detail(s) you have presented.

On "To Catch a Predator" emails and communication is exchanges with minors, that is very true, BUT arrests are not made until the predator actually shows-up to commit the proposed act. I don''''t think I have ever seen that Foley showed for his victims. I do not condone what he did, but he did not complete the act.
Thanks Doc for clearing my head

[docpeter1953]

Guess the government has not seen "To Catch a Predator" Those people sent messages to who they thought were underage boys and girls and were arrested immediatly. SAME D@MN THING. That''''s your F@G Government taking care of your F@G Government

Posted by chefrc at 09:56 AM : Sep 19, 2008
____________

You are correct if you make one small correction in the detail(s) you have presented.

On "To Catch a Predator" emails and communication is exchanges with minors, that is very true, BUT arrests are not made until the predator actually shows-up to commit the proposed act. I don''t think I have ever seen that Foley showed for his victims. I do not condone what he did, but he did not complete the act.

[notblue]

clovis, please tell me what this congress has accomlished? I think Foley''s approval ratings are higher.

[chefrc]

Guess the government has not seen "To Catch a Predator" Those people sent messages to who they thought were underage boys and girls and were arrested immediatly. SAME D@MN THING. That''s your F@G Government taking care of your F@G Government

[luvienne]

Is anyone surprised? It is 2008. No matter how long, people will remember this creep.

[clovisbuford]

YET ANOTHER investigation by the do nothings in Washington, it will be the legacy of this congress.
Posted by notblue at 09:33 AM : Sep 19, 2008
errr so you aer saying the FBI should not have investigated what at the very least was innapropriate sexual inuendo by Republican Foley towards some of the pages he was charged with helping to oversee ? or you are saaying because it wsnt your son wasn''t involved its ok ? or are you saying its congress fault because he is a Republican legislator just like Craig buried in the closet?

[notblue]

YET ANOTHER investigation by the do nothings in Washington, it will be the legacy of this congress.

[jjp735i]

It figures. When a Republican does something "lurid", it''s not really lurid. So it''s okay to send lurid messages to underage teens as long as you don''t meet up with them? Teen chat rooms will be busy.

[usclimey]

Between this and the first Dude/subpoena story, it''s a bad day for the GOPigs on the Justice side.