Comments on: Feds: Fire Downed WTC Building 7 On 9/11
But Critics Say There Is Evidence Explosives Were Behind Demise Of Skyscraper Next To Twin Towers
Add a Comment See all 192 Comments
- It`s closer to the truth with just enough details to make it believeable...
Regards,
Posted by Nancy_Naive at 01:53 PM : Aug 22, 2008
You know Nancy....with all the unfounded propaganda that you post all time against our government you''re not a bit different than Hanoi Hannah. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by Nancy_Naive at 01:46 PM : Aug 22, 2008
Thank you! - Reply to this comment
- "A bridge and a building are two different items, but the whole bridge didn''''t collapse and turn to powder did it"?
That bridge didn''t have millions of tons of swaying weight on it. Did it? and isn''t it amazing that the buildings began to collapse were the aircraft hit!
"But tell me CBStom how do 4 airliners from the same airport go missing within minutes of each an no one notices"? Who said that they didn''t notice them off flight? Do we automatically launch the military when the control towers have a glitch? There was a lot of traffic I would suspect at that time in the morning. - Reply to this comment
- Couldn`t happen now... we are safe because of the No-Fly List...
Regards,
Posted by Nancy_Naive at 01:36 PM : Aug 22, 2008
For the love of God...who pulled your chain? I wish you were on the Go fly a kite list and never showed up on another news site. You''re a class A bore. - Reply to this comment
- Oh right!!! And the intelligence and technology was just as good as it is today huh? Your comment falls just "under the radar"!!!
Posted by liberalme at 01:20 PM : Aug 22, 2008
It seems as though you have trouble with COMPREHENSION.....the point was that the element of surprise catches people off guard, asleep at the wheel, and unable to put facts together quickly. A series of events start to unfold....that''s why four target were simultaneously planned...to cause confusion. It would be a different story if it happened now. - Reply to this comment
- oh yeah You tube the ultimate authority in the universe. If it''s on the net, it must be true.
- Reply to this comment
Liberalme, hope that''''s a typo cause steel doesn''''t burn at 200-degrees, water doesn''''t boil at 200.
Posted by talkingham
Sorry my mistake--copied the wrong info
Now the melting temperature of steel (iron+carbon) is 1532 C, or 2790 F.- Reply to this comment
- The point remains that 4 airliners get high-jacked during a period of heightened security and no military aircraft are scrambled? And one of them just happens to fly into the most secure above ground building in the USA, namely the Pentagon without so much as a jet being scrambled.
The jets were 15 minutes away, of course the military was doing an exercise that morning, practicing what they would do if terrorists were attacking the WTC. You can understand a lot by watching on youtube "9/11 coincidence".
Watch them, (there are 20) and then come back here. - Reply to this comment
- Oh and by the way....do you understand what the element of surprise means? Or confusion, or panic? Ever heard of Pearl Harbor?
Posted by Mycomment at 01:15 PM : Aug 22, 2008
Oh right!!! And the intelligence and technology was just as good as it is today huh? Your comment falls just "under the radar"!!! - Reply to this comment
- I find it hard to believe that 4 planes disappear from the same airport and no one notices. Very hard to believe. No air cover over the capitol after two planes hit the trade towers.
Posted by talkingham at 12:48 PM : Aug 22, 2008
Oh and by the way....do you understand what the element of surprise means? Or confusion, or panic? Ever heard of Pearl Harbor? - Reply to this comment
- "When the towers fell, it was like an earthquake, the buildings around all had structural damage. And then there was fire and the lack of water. Why is it so hard to believe that fire caused this collapse?"
First, you can wuit with your earth quake idea, all the glass is still in the building. So, your trying to say that the building 1&2 fell so hard that they shook down the building, yet shook it so litlle that practically all the glass in the building was unbroken, is insulting. Fire has never, NEVER, brought down a building until 9/11. I can look at the building, on the many you tube videos, and see there was no significant fire, and definitaly not any kind of fire that would have the building come down as if done by demolition. Why don''t you take a look at the declassified 1962 plan called "Operation Northwoods".
Here''s the Wikipedia link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Keep that tin foil on your head Bushite. - Reply to this comment
- But since you are perfectly happy believing what corporate media and political hacks have explained then sleep well, I doubt you could handle the truth.
Posted by talkingham at 12:48 PM : Aug 22, 2008
No, I''m perfectly happy being sane and not being some cynical paranoid looney. - Reply to this comment
- MYcomment, how many cel phone calls have you made from a plane flying at altitude? None. It''s almost impossible.
I''m not saying you should believe anything. I''m saying the investigation was a whitewash, political spectacle and little more, otherwise why are we here 7 years later and just now getting the explanation for building 7, what a joke.
I find it hard to believe that 4 planes disappear from the same airport and no one notices. Very hard to believe. No air cover over the capitol after two planes hit the trade towers. Very convenient indeed.
But since you are perfectly happy believing what corporate media and political hacks have explained then sleep well, I doubt you could handle the truth. - Reply to this comment
- It''s time to move on from this!
P.S. looks like bigfoot was another fake also...
Posted by cbs_tom at 12:02 PM : Aug 22, 2008
You''re wasting your time with these guys...they don''t even trust what they see with their own eyes. They are not smart enough to realize that no building is meant to withstand a JET CRASHING into loaded with JET FUEL. Never mind that people called from one of the planes and told them WHO and WHY they were being highjacked. They are having way too much fun thinking they are more clever than everbody else. You know the old saying ''there''s none so blind as he who will not see''. - Reply to this comment
- A bridge and a building are two different items, but the whole bridge didn''t collapse and turn to powder did it?
But tell me CBStom how do 4 airliners from the same airport go missing within minutes of each an no one notices? And this is during a heightened state of alert that had been trumpeted by the media during the entire summer of 2001.
No clear photo of the jet that supposedly hit the Pentagon by any security cam and whose titanium coated steel engines were never found, and the windows adjacent to the entry point on the Pentagon weren''t even shattered where the engines should have entered. Move along sheeple.
The so-called 911 commission was composed of political hacks. They weren''t looking for anything beyond the "obvious" and of course didn''t find anything. - Reply to this comment
- First question that comes to mind is are these the same people that said Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. If so find a new bunch of investigators.
The problem now has become one of lies told by the administration and no one believes anything that comes out of it even if it is the truth. - Reply to this comment
- I think with the evidence at hand, we must consider it the truth unless proven otherwise.
But to insist that there is a conspiracy without facts is a little looney don''t you think.
Get the facts and we''ll listen. Don''t assume until you have the facts! - Reply to this comment
- Tanker Explosion Causes Bay Bridge Maze Collapse
Two connector ramps of the Bay Bridge MacArthur Maze (map), located near Emeryville, collapsed Sunday morning after an explosion and fire.
Heat from the fire, which reached temperatures estimated at up to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, caused the metal bolts and girders on the highway connector ramp above to melt. The overpass then gave way and collapsed.
http://www.nbc11.com/news/13217764/detail.html - Reply to this comment
- Liberalme, hope that''s a typo cause steel doesn''t burn at 200-degrees, water doesn''t boil at 200.
What you in-denial anti conspiracy people don''t get is that it could just as easily be a foreign intelligence service that hatched this plot and simply used the terrorist as dupes and fall guys - it has now cost us more than a trillion dollars and severely weakened the status of our military. Pretty successful plot I''d say or the highest level of incompetence in modern history.
The point remains that 4 airliners get high-jacked during a period of heightened security and no military aircraft are scrambled? And one of them just happens to fly into the most secure above ground building in the USA, namely the Pentagon without so much as a jet being scrambled. Idiots, sheeple, and fools. Shoot the messengers, nothing to see here.
I''m really concerned that the same plotters are licking their chops at the social upheaval they could bestow upon us during this election year. - Reply to this comment
- I would think that in order for the WTC building to be a conspiracy, the twin towers too would have to be part of that conspiracy. I think that there is conclusive evidence that after the aircraft (you know, the 2 we have all seen)crashed into the trade center, the full fuel tanks fed the fire. With the weight of the building atop of the crashsites and the design of the steel structure, it is obvious (to most) that the steel failed and the building came tumbling down. The steel does not need to melt in order to fail. The weight and swaying (natural occurence) of the building, along with the heat caused the structural failure.
It''s time to move on from this!
P.S. looks like bigfoot was another fake also... - Reply to this comment
