Comments on: Calif.: Docs Can't Deny Care To Lesbians

Top Court Rules Doctors Can't Invoke Moral Objections To Refuse Treatment To Gays, Lesbians

[jon2012-2009]

Here''''s a compromise: Let''''s ban all abortions. Then we can give all the unwanted children to gay and lesbian couples to raise.
Posted by DaGrandma at 12:20 PM : Aug 19, 2008

There is no need for compromise when everybody can get exactly what they want: leave it to the woman to decide.

[cbsfan73]

DaVicar2 winked at me. He must be homosexual.

[cbsfan73]

DaVicar2 revealed his self:
"Admit it! If you went down the adoptin station, and they had four ankle-biters to choose from, and three of them looked like little monkey-kids, and one looked like Joan Benet Ramsey...which one would YOU pick???"

I would pick the one with the best personality.

[dagrandma]

Here''s a compromise: Let''s ban all abortions. Then we can give all the unwanted children to gay and lesbian couples to raise.

[cbsfan73]

DaVicar2 stated:
"I disagree!!! (on adopting children) I am not an idiot!"

Shut up and go read Oliver Twist.

[hbevis]

Yet you would rather save the fetus than save the health or life of the mother. So a fetus deserves more protection than the mother or even the child it becomes. That''''s what faith can do, make a person less rational. It''''s not for nothing religious types are called loonies.

Posted by jon2012 at 12:13 PM : Aug 19, 2008

I am for letting women have an abortion under very limited rules. If there is Rape, Incest, or the mothers life is in danger. NO PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION AT ALL. I HAVE HEARD TO MANY DOCTORS SAY THAT THERE IS NO WAY A WOMAN LIFE CAN BE IN DANGER ONCE THE BABY IS OUT OF ITS MOTHER, EXCEPT FOR THE HEAD..

[jon2012-2009]

I absolutely agree no one should get preferential treatment. A pharmacist should not be able to block access to birth control to anybody.
Posted by jon2012

YEAH! Even EIGHT-YEAR-OLDS ! ! !
Posted by DaVicar2 at 12:07 PM : Aug 19, 2008

Goes without saying. An 8-year-old boy, even if already fertile, is not ready for a family, wouldn''t you say? Did you mean a girl? The same argument.

[cbsfan73]

DaVicar2 wrote:
"Yes, but how many of them are ''''pretty children'''', huh?"

Welcome to the world of compassion...

[cbsfan73]

DaVicar2 wrote:
Yes, but how many of them are ''''pretty children'''', huh?

This can''t be predicted by giving child birth.

[hbevis]

Here''''s my question. Why are there any gay people at all, if your premise holds water?


Posted by WiccanTexan at 10:57 AM : Aug 19, 2008

We are talking about how impressionable children are here. And how they will think that it is just fine to have two adults of the same s.e.x. sleeping together.
I have had three cousins that were ****''s. I feel that two of them were born that way, the other I feel that it was a learned behavior. There has always been ****''s in the world for whatever reason.

And I think that many people learn to be that way as they grow up. For example, a young man that I know was bathed by his mother up into his Teen years. His daddy raised holy H.e.l.l. and his wife just ignored him, but had to finely quit. It took many years for him to have anything to do with a woman. Finely, when he was about 30 years old he got married. He had gone to school and had a master''s degree in Biology by the time he got married.

I have a good friend that is over 70 years old and he never got married. The reason, his mother was a hypochondriac. He had the feeling that all women could and would be that way sooner or later. I thought that he was a **** for a long time, but he was not. Its anyone guess as to what to do with or about ****''s. I don''t like the idea of them being mistreated or anything like that, I just don''t think that it is a good idea for them to be raising children. This whole thing has been and is being PUSHED by the Super-Liberals.

[jon2012-2009]

oh yeah... and about a million plus years of evolution - thanks, and good luck trying to destroy the lives of children!
Posted by dogsoul at 11:50 AM : Aug 19, 2008

Have you heard of the child who was starved to death for refusing to say ''Amen'' after dinner? Yet you would rather save the fetus than save the health or life of the mother. So a fetus deserves more protection than the mother or even the child it becomes. That''s what faith can do, make a person less rational. It''s not for nothing religious types are called loonies.

[cbsfan73]

diatreme wrote:
"Say it along with me you idiots, "ADOPTION!".

I totally agree.

[cbsfan73]

I wonder if they chose a g a y sperm donor.

[jon2012-2009]

let me get this straight, in American a pharmicist can refuse to give a straight woman birth control because of religious beliefs, but a doctor has to give a g a y woman fertility treatment. Talk about pandering to a minority. No group should ever get preferential treatment, why are g a y s afforded extra protections?
Posted by getoffmine at 11:54 AM : Aug 19, 2008

I absolutely agree no one should get preferential treatment. A pharmacist should not be able to block access to birth control to anybody.

[micma-2009]

let me get this straight, in American a pharmicist can refuse to give a straight woman birth control because of religious beliefs, but a doctor has to give a g a y woman fertility treatment. Talk about pandering to a minority. No group should ever get preferential treatment, why are g a y s afforded extra protections?

Posted by getoffmine at 11:54 AM : Aug 19, 2008



Extra protections? What extra protections? This couple simply wanted to be treated as any other couple would. They expected a medical professional to act like one and provide health care without discrimination. If he could not do this, he''s in the wrong profession. Perhaps he should be preaching hate from the pulpit instead.

[wiccantexan]

"in American a pharmicist can refuse to give a straight woman birth control because of religious beliefs," ----- This has been challenged in court as well; no pandering.

[mensarino]

getoffmine---He can''t do that in California

[micma-2009]

dogbreath


BELIEVE what you want. But you can prove nothing with your unscientific "studies". Live and let live. You''ll be a lot happier.

[mensarino]

Dogsoul---I am surprised that you believe in evolution---some hope for you after all!

[dogsoul]

"Dogsoul--You are a lost cause.I realize that I cannot reason with the unreasonable.Go ahead, believe what you will but understand that your foundation is shaky----shored up by pseudo-science and superstition. "

oh yeah... and about a million plus years of evolution - thanks, and good luck trying to destroy the lives of children!