Comments on: Feds: Ivins Was Lone Anthrax Killer

Documents Allege Scientist Had Anthrax Linked To 2001 Attacks, Planned To Kill Those Who "Wronged Him"

[aeasus]

Still no solid evidence. Just finger pointing.

[kenhamlett]

--getoffmine--

I looked in on this and the Washington Post confirms your assessment of Dudley. It is really no surprise. I have found that regardless of the title or position of mental "health" professionals and no matter where they practice, they have been persons of very low character with meaningless opinions. The difference is that Dudley attached herself to a high profile investigation.
In fact I can not really blame the FBI agents for a lot of the poor data. Psychiatrist often find a corrupt or foolish judge to help falsify information or to issue orders to purge records. The investigation can never be accurate when psychiatrists are involved. Their primary goal is to manipulate information and the FBI simply follows along and apparently has a policy to ignore information that has been manipulated.
It is unlikely the FBI will find anything of value if they persist in only looking at the information that has be restructured. I say blame DOJ policy for the practice of allowing manipulated data to override the truth. We can also blame Judges for going along with the foolish practice of recognizing them and assisting in this corrupt practice.

[joker1944-2009]

They''re ''closing'' the case, because more than likely there will be a Dem in the White House next year with larger majorities in the House and Senate, and they need to cover up any loose ends that could possibly incriminate anyone in the (soon to be) former administration. Nothing else makes sense. Ivins was just a patsy.

It would be nice if someone - anyone - in the MSM would take this up and expose this case as the flimsy piece of garbage it is.

How about we start with a report on this so-called ''therapist''? Dudley is her name. The one who scribbled accusations on a piece of paper and mispelled the word ''therapist'' in the process? The one with massive legal problems due to her obvious alcohol addiction.

[liberalme]

FBI-CIA not agencies that have been above reproach over the years--

Our future new administration will have a lot of investigating to do once the current criminals are out of office---that is if they haven''t "lost/erased/shreaded" the needed ammunition.

[jmurrieta1]

Another empty, meaningless press release. Too bad our "free press" can''t be bothered to ask embarrassing questions to those in power.

For example, what is it:
"An advanced DNA analysis that matched the anthrax used in the attacks to a specific batch controlled by Ivins. It is unclear, however, how the FBI eliminated as suspects others in the lab who had access to it."


And why wasn''t it available in 2003, when the weaponized anthrax genome was fully sequenced at NIH?

It''s almost like the corrupt Bush administration instructed the FBI to take their time and not push to hard to find the perp.

And why would that be?

Can we have a real reporter look into this?

[joker1944-2009]

The government''s case is being tried in the court of public opinion. It includes:

1. The idea that Ivins was ''homicidal'' and a ''revenge killer.'' The one source is a just out of school social worker with a long history of alcohol abuse and legal problems. This characterization is strongly denied by Ivins friends and co-workers - some of which had known him for decades.

2. The idea that Ivins was obsessed with a sorority. Although they have yet to produce any proof of this (and of course the ''librul'' media has repeated this claim over and over.)

In other words, the FBI have done a post-mortem mega-smear on someone unable to defend himself, using the media to catapult the propaganda. Nice.

[SamThornton]

It''s a sign of our times that, while explanations offered by the FBI and Justice Department in this case may be absolutely true and above board, the record of the current Administration and its Justice Department immediately bring into serious question the truth of any statement they might make on any subject. The current Attorney General bears a significant part of the responsibility for public distrust of this once proud institution.

[neoconrcrazy]

usually there is a MOTIVE behind such an action.

Ivin''s motive ?

[eggy1620]

This smells as bad as Vince Foster.