Comments on: Dogs Trained For Bestiality Get Reprieve
Animal Sanctuary To Accept 2 Canines Allegedly Taped Having Sex With Female Owner
Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
- Why do you fools feel compelled to post to a story that's a year old?
- Reply to this comment
- A dog, trained to rape...shakes head...to say that's ludicrous, isn't even close to what I want to say. Even if the deputy was enough of an idiot to put something like that in an affidavit, I cannot even begin to believe, what could've possesed CBS to print such a thing. Do online articles get to skip the editor, before they're put on the website??!!
- Reply to this comment
- Train a dog to rape, give me a break. I wonder if anyone fell for that line.
- Reply to this comment
-
- How does an animal get trained to do something so natural?
How do they think dogs exist right now; by being trained to have sex?
They'd have sex with anything that moves and 'fits', let alone 'humans'.
Coercion is natural in all animals, anyway.
At least zoosexuals can decide to stop coercing/harming their non-human mates.
Yes, other animals can decide, too.
True zoophiles are losing out, thanks to its desperate, evil, and self-gratifying counterparts, bestiality and zoosadist.
Thanks for reading my comments.
- How does an animal get trained to do something so natural?
- and may i remind you that se x with children and same se x IS NOTHING NEW WITH LIBERALS..as a matter of fact that is such a norm ITS ALREADY ACCEPTED..
the difference here is LIBERAL MEDIA PROMOTES these kind of sick and twisted behaviour...
Go back to letting talk radio do your thinking for you sir...it''s probably better off that way. - Reply to this comment
- So is it safe to say the Lady was getting Lucky
- Reply to this comment
- Because we all know that perversion is limited to liberals. I mean the Priest *** scandals, the recent congressional same *** / airport scandals, Haggard and such are all examples of liberal perversion..... oh wait...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by ulfvitr at 05:54 PM : Jul 23, 2008
+ report abuse
and may i remind you that se x with children and same se x IS NOTHING NEW WITH LIBERALS..as a matter of fact that is such a norm ITS ALREADY ACCEPTED..
the difference here is LIBERAL MEDIA PROMOTES these kind of sick and twisted behaviour... - Reply to this comment
-
- Zoosexuality is much more common than what you see in the media.
In every state in the USA, and smaller country, there is at least one case of bestiality/zoophilia/zoosadism 'criminal charges'; but there are millions of zoosexuals out there, that is what I call a norm.
I mean 1,000,000/6,740,000,000 humans? That's an awful a lot of zoosexuals; and that's just the active members of the online zoosexual communities.
It's rare in the news, because they like to keep their heads down in fear they'll lose their non-human animal partner, be called perverts, or face a criminal charge - lover, rapist, or sadist, it doesn't matter.
But still, the true loving zoophiles are not bad.
- Zoosexuality is much more common than what you see in the media.
- decadent perversion..the foundation of a good healthy liberal tv show..
Posted by libsluv2spit at 06:07 PM : Jul 22, 2008
Because we all know that perversion is limited to liberals. I mean the Priest *** scandals, the recent congressional same *** / airport scandals, Haggard and such are all examples of liberal perversion..... oh wait... - Reply to this comment
- I am so happy for these dogs....They deserve to be spoiled for a very long time after all they have been through. It''s a sad world we live in when humans train animals to do such things.
- Reply to this comment
-
- It seems everyone trains their dogs.
May I ask, how does one train dogs to do something already natural to them?
Not all zoosexuals can afford to train dogs in such away, so it is a load of rubbish.
Dogs are hedonistic species and would love to have sex with anything that moves, if it is bent over, and waiting to be 'penetrated'; humans make the perfect level and posture when bent over, as does a female dog; that's why they are successful at breeding, - because the females are at the right height position for males (just so are humans); its nothing to do with any 'nature'. Everything you see is successful, only because 'it comes together'; I'm sure if sex didn't exist, you'd soon find something else to moan about, right?
- It seems everyone trains their dogs.
- These two need to be fixed to where they cant have *** anymore with anyone or anything!! What next? Inosent children?
- Reply to this comment
- Did she wear an Old Mother Hubbard costume?
- Reply to this comment
- Ewwwwwwwww!!!! And I''m going to have to agree: the incompetent deputy who recommended that these dogs be euthanized, should be castrated himself.
- Reply to this comment
- The Re-pugs are fighting each other for the use of these dogs already. And I had my first post on this page yanked for saying so.
- Reply to this comment
- "I am sure the Bu$h administration has noted your screen names..."
The great country you people have turned America into. You must be so proud, you bootlickers probably can''t wait for the, soon to be, mandatory anal probe(in the name of fighting terrorism, of course). - Reply to this comment
- What about the sheep and cattle victims in texass? Check up on the word "cowpoke" and see what it REALLY means!!!
- Reply to this comment
- A deputy who investigated the case had recommended that the dogs be euthanized and wrote in court affidavits that they had been trained to rape.
*************************************************
That has got to be the most ignorant statement I have ever hear issued from a human mouth. This guy shouldn''t be anywhere near law enforcement, let alone wearing a badge. What an idiot. - Reply to this comment
-
- I'm not too sure who you were calling an idiot, the deputy, the publisher/editor or the 'offender'.
I'm sure everyone would enjoy to be euthanized, right?
The dogs were the victims, if zoosexual rape did take place.
Why don't we castrate/euthanize all 'victims', instead of the criminals?
How does a dog get trained to do natural things, anyway?
I bet they meant puppy training, right?
Because, we actually DO train humans as well.
You do realise most zoosexuals can't afford training dogs?
Hey, what about those who hurt/abuse animals and don't even think about giving them pleasure (because they like to give them pain)?
What about the meat industry?
Would an animal be better exploring sexual pleasures, or being hurt and cut into little pieces, so humans can enjoy the meaty taste?
Where in an animal's genes does it say 'you must have sex with animals the same species'? Surely, when one gets an erection (because of testosterone), there's not many other places you can put that 'lunging prod' into, but any species' orifice; and a bent over human/dog, seems to be the perfect solution for fulfilling such a desire, right?
I thought humans liked to be 'seperate' from 'the animals' and 'nature'; and yet it is a 'crime against nature'!
Why is there so many contradiction in the anti-zoo's words?
'Evolution', 'next generation', who gives a damn about 'the next generation', ok, you can procreate and concept the latest member of your species, but if you fall in love with any species, human or not, you want to spend the rest of your life with them; and to give 'pleasure' to each other, to show how much you love each other, you resort to affection, and the most consensual, sensual affection, is sex.
Sex is pleasure, not harm.
There are those who are so desperate, they coerce / abduct (/fence-hop) / explore, whoever they can find, that's called 'bestiality', and it often feature 'rape'; and even its brutal counterpart, 'zoosadism'.
But there are also those who love the animal, the 'zoophile'.
You may not realise, but if you find a book about a '(wo)man and his/her dog', in the 'romance' section of a library, you're most likely going to read a book about a zoophile, even if sexuality is not experienced.
A 'zoophile' is someone who has strong, emotional bonds with an animal, and hence is in a relationship.
There are three levels of zoophilia, they are the following...
1. Affectional Zoophilia (deep love, loving affection).
2. Fantasy Zoophilia (deep love, loving affection, sexual attraction, sexual fantasy).
3. Erotic Zoophilia (deep love, loving affection, sexual attraction, sexual fantasy, sexual fondness, sexual intercourse).
Zoophiles experience such a strong bond, they resort to affection, they thrive on giving pleasure to their beloved partner, whom happens to be non-human, and the ultimate way of giving their mate affection, is pleasure, and pleasure shows show much the zoophile loves their animal mate, and the ultimate form of giving someone affectional pleasure, is sex.
Zoophiles don't coerce their animals, they love them so much they wouldn't even dare thinking of forcing or harming them; would you do it to your spouse, if you love them? No, you wouldn't. And zoophiles feel the same.
The trouble is, there a lot of desperate people out there, who coerce and hurt animals for sexual self-gratification, and perhaps even children or mentally ill (because they are perhaps so ugly or unliked, no normal, adult human would have sex with them); so they resort to an 'available' sex partner, and that is normally 'non-human animals', who are easy to rape, if not aggressive, however, I have a reason to believe a lot of vicious animals are caused by sadistic abuse, sadistic or not. We name those who rape, 'bestialists', and those who brutally rape, 'zoosadist'; they aren't nice people, may be that's why such rapists are attracted to animals and children, because they are easier to force by harm, than a adult human is; I think the phrase 'pick on someone your own size', comes to mind.
These 'true zoophiles', out there, with romantic, relationships with their animals, are perfectly innocent; just because they like to give the animal a little bit more extra pleasure than the average belly-rub, puts them on the same level as rapists.
Well, there are non-zoosexual zoosadists; and there are rapists who rape humans.
Rape and harm should be banned, not sexuality; because sexuality is more likely to stem from love, not sexual coercion.
Whatever you want to choose or think, it's up to you.
But it's about time you anti-zoos kept your opinions to yourselves, and drop the books of fiction, who solely follow as historical religion.
And finally realise you a succumbing to the terrorists, and disabling the freedoms of those who truly only have sex with animals to give pleasure to their beloved non-human mates, not harm.
Thank you for reading my comments.
- I'm not too sure who you were calling an idiot, the deputy, the publisher/editor or the 'offender'.
- "how many lines and how many miles of women do you have??you are one sad dude... " Posted by libsluv2spit
none.
where did I say that I had some long line of women wanting me?
and I''m "one sad dude" because why? I find humor in the ridiculous things other people do?
what''s the matter? you can''t handle it when others don''t agree with your hatred? - Reply to this comment
- How did they prove that the dogs did not like it?
- Reply to this comment
- This is a sad sick testimony of how lost our society has become ...
A couple of sick peeoples that have warped minds and needs severe behavioral adjustments. ...
Sad Sad .... - Reply to this comment
- This is SICK!!
- Reply to this comment
- You cannot place these dogs for adoption. You canno tbreak the behavior. Imagine the walk to the park where they takle kids.
- Reply to this comment
