Comments on: Mass. Aims To Open Gay Marriage Floodgates

State Senate Votes To Allow Same-Sex Couples From Other States; House Expected To Vote This Week

[dedad1]

I guess THAT''S that

[dedad1]

When right and wrong are removed from the equation, it affects everyone.

[dedad1]

The line between right and wrong is all but gone. When it is completely gone we are left with chaos, and that will be disguised as tolerance.

[dedad1]

I have never said interracial marriage was wrong. My point is simply that no matter what the situation, homsexuality, drugs, bad behavoir, peolpe dont like to be to be called on it. Example: I was in Busch Gardens w/ my family ( 3 young kids). The family sitting at the lunch table next us had a teenage daughter who was dropping the MF bomb left and right. I asked her (civily) if she would please stop saying it in front of my kids. Her mom proceeded to go off on me using worse language than the kid! Who was wrong in that instance?

[wolfear1]

Ok Dedad I will try and respond to your whole argument. it comes down to the simple creedo of live and let live. In the 60''s people used the exact same arguments to try and prevent interracial marriage from happening. And before you say it is between a man and a woman; at that time it wasn''t considered as such. In most states it was held under the same "Crimes Against Nature" statute that Homosexuality and beastiality were held. Your beleif that something is wrong or immoral is your right but when you choose to extend that beleif to where it effect a segment of society then that is wrong. 2 men or women getting married in no way effects you personally. Any more than my interracial marriage effects you. So yes please feel free to voice your opinion but understand when you cross into the bounds of where it prevents others from rights that should be theirs then you have stepped over your bounds.

[dedad1]

Well, I guess that''s that

[avigil2]

None of these posts (banter) relate to anything in this article. What''s wrong with you people!

[dedad1]

Nancy - you have just proven my point. You obviously disagree with me and like most people who have no other intelligent things to say will sink to name calling to try and make themselves feel better. Caeric- You left out the first part of my post. Respond to the whole instead of using part of it to fulfill your agenda

[dedad1]

And sometimes, Ubi fumus, ibi ignis.

I give up.....

[caeric]

You are a bigot and hate monger if what some does offends you and you call them on it. -dedad1

And sometimes, Ubi fumus, ibi ignis.