Comments on: After Gun Ban Ruling, D.C. Seeks New Rules

As Residents Head To Gun Shops, Officials Scramble To Draft New Regulations

Add a Comment See all 72 Comments
by rushlimbaug4 July 6, 2008 2:57 PM EDT
The idiots in DC will do everything they can to curb around the new ruling that the citizens can own handguns. They will still make it as hard as can be, but have no fear, NRA is here to sue if they still play with you.

The intullectually challengedd libs in this country still try to thrwart there ideas into anything they can despite a supreme court ruling, typical lib freedom haters. DC residence, go buy your new hand guns and defend yourself. Your 32 years behind the times.

Posted by zgomer at 11:51 AM : Jul 06, 2008

GOD BLESS YOU GOMER!! Every man women and child should have a gun issued to them with their drivers license. We live in a dangerous nation where you can not trust your neighbor, you best friend or your WIFE!! I have had a few run ins with cranky seniors and had I had a pistol within arms length, well needless to say I would have won that argument over who was first in line at the grocery checkout!!! LIBZZZ!!
Reply to this comment
by dowjones20k July 6, 2008 2:35 PM EDT
There are people who had these crazy things done to them.. but normal people don''''t go around think''''n about that stuff. Thats why they lock those people up in a barbed wire basement full of tv monitors.. They''''re weird.

Posted by sidvicious75

How many of these locked up crimunals are released and then reoffend?

Not sure where your neighborhood is .. but I seriously doubt you ever stepped out in say .. south central LA, Houstons Walnut Bend, South Dallas, Dorchester, Roxbury, Springfield MA,

There are tons of crime ridden communities in this country .. and the notion that if one does not have the right to defend thier family or thier property is preposterous ...

Many of us "sheltered" Americans who are not living in crime ridden, drug, gang infested communities or have been subjected to a violent crime can sit in judgement and pooh pooh the reality .. this is not a video game you can just turn off ..

You are naive .... and if you get on the web or watch the news (if it bleeds it leads) and research crime you might be more open minded about what your ranting about ..
Reply to this comment
by jon2012-2009 July 6, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
I was attacked one day by a meth head and struck down with lead pipe had i not had a weapon he would struck me twice and killed me .He died that cold january morning in front of his eight year old daughter and his wife.Turned out to be a mistaken identity on his part the authorities believed
Posted by tootall10142 at 08:38 AM : Jul 06, 2008

This is indeed an argument for having guns on your person, at home or on the street. So why not put that in the Constitution, an amendment to own weapons for self-defense or even for any purpose the individual may determine?
Reply to this comment
by jon2012-2009 July 6, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that the 2nd Amendment does not necessarily connect to state security or any consideration for that matter but an unconditional guarantee of the individual''s right to possess weapons and military arsenal for whatever use they may be deemed necessary, we await how this is all going to shake out. From this point on, we depend on our Justices for guidance having abandoned the logic and precedents that once bound us to the spirit and letter of the Constitution.
Reply to this comment
by jj67rs July 6, 2008 1:57 PM EDT
I believe it to be a sad day in our country when our leaders cannot and will not admit when they are wrong. That D.C. gun ban was wrong. I would like to know how many innocent lives were lost there because they could not protect themselves, because of that ban. Now that the ban has been lifted, I want to know why these people who are so against guns, think that it is going to get worse. That ban had been in place for over thirty years and it did nothing to stop crime. D.C. is still one of the worst places to live. If that doesn''t say failed policy I don''t know what does. Personally, I think that many of these people who are against guns are really just cowards themselves. Cowards, who are dependant on the police and anybody else who would come to their aid, because they themselves would not have the courage to protect and defend themselves and their families. I hope the day never comes that I am not mentally and physically strong enough, willing or able to protect and defend , myself and my family. The people of this Great Country are becoming to weak and dependant.
Reply to this comment
by tootall10142 July 6, 2008 1:39 PM EDT
WHEN ONE THESE CITY LEADERS GETS THIER WIFE OR HUSBAND GUNNED DOWN WE CAN ASK THEM THEN HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT GUN CONTROL NOW?IF THIS DOES HAPPE THEY DESERVE EVERY MINUTE OF GRIEF AND SORROW,BUT WORRY NOT THIER KIDS CAN DRAW SOCIAL SECURITY TO PAY FOR THIER MEDS FOR DEPREESION BECAUSE MOMMY GOT KILLED BY A MAN WITH A SHORT GUN. BOO FLUCKIN WHOOO!
Reply to this comment
by generey July 6, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
Critics, meanwhile, charged the proposal doesn''t address the city''s unusual regulation of machine guns, which D.C. defines as weapons that shoot at least 12 rounds without reloading. That restriction applies to many popular semiautomatic firearms.

THIS "definition" is where DC is going to "getcha".
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 July 6, 2008 12:33 PM EDT
All I know is, from my cold dead fingers people ,cold dead fingers. They will pry my gun. They won''''t take away my rights.

Posted by mo005 at 09:28 AM : Jul 06, 2008





Correct. A criminal will shoot and kill you, and take the gun from your "cold dead fingers". Then he will have two guns.
Reply to this comment
by mo005 July 6, 2008 12:28 PM EDT
All these postings and only one that about the subject. This posting stuff is about *** when all you have are idiots that ramble about dumb stuff. All I know is, from my cold dead fingers people ,cold dead fingers. They will pry my gun. They won''t take away my rights.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 July 6, 2008 12:00 PM EDT
LET THEM KNOW YOU WANT HILLARY!!!!!

Posted by JTait2 at 07:53 AM : Jul 06, 2008





Hillary STILL lost. Nothing has changed.

By the way, I have a little secret for you - the super delegates CANNOT endorse a candidate that has CONCEDED defeat, and has withdrawn from the nomination process.

Do you have ANY IDEA of how the process works? Has our school systems become such as abysmal failure, as to produce such uneducated people as yourself?

No wonder our country is in such trouble!!
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 July 6, 2008 11:52 AM EDT
Not sure what the store owners problem is. If a law is rescinded, wouldn''t you revert to the rules that are pertinent now with like rules before the ban? Gonna run himself out of business worrying about nothing it sounds. Folks are just gonna go elsewhere to get a firearm to protect themselves from the DC hordes of gangs and political left bureaucracy''s......On second thought, the BATFE''s new theme for intimidation tactics is "ALWAYS THINK FORFEITURE". Uh, I''m not kidding people. Bet you have to be a good college brain-trained commie fascist to get a job there. Communists have the best record anywhere for "confiscating" their cit,....I mean serfs property. What little they have that is. Maybe those agents have that store owner spooked up a bit.
Reply to this comment
by tootall10142 July 6, 2008 11:48 AM EDT
Hey sid vicious in some ways i agree with you and some i dont ,you seem to be a little upset with your government.wonder why?
Reply to this comment
by tootall10142 July 6, 2008 11:38 AM EDT
I was attacked one day by a meth head and struck down with lead pipe had i not had a weapon he would struck me twice and killed me .He died that cold january morning in front of his eight year old daughter and his wife.Turned out to be a mistaken identity on his part the authorities believed.this was not the first life i had taken in my life time.Iswore the one before this guy would be the last ,yea right!
Reply to this comment
by sidvicious75 July 6, 2008 10:41 AM EDT
At least Obama ain''t gonna up and move to a foreign country with all our tax payer money.
Reply to this comment
by poopus123 July 6, 2008 10:34 AM EDT
Please re-interpret my second amendment rights while I reload.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Scratch0058

HAHA. Nice....
Reply to this comment
by sidvicious75 July 6, 2008 10:33 AM EDT
I wouldn''t even put someone with a mental illness on a plane, or a bus or a train. That means all you politicians are gonna have to drive to work..
Reply to this comment
by sidvicious75 July 6, 2008 10:30 AM EDT
Flag mental illness the same way you''d flag a felony. Its the only way to keep guns away from the mentally ill while not violating their privacy.
Reply to this comment
by sidvicious75 July 6, 2008 10:29 AM EDT
"No sir! No sir! I''m not paranoid! Iraq has wmds!"
Reply to this comment
by sidvicious75 July 6, 2008 10:27 AM EDT
Thats why I''m a western vegetarian.
Reply to this comment
by sidvicious75 July 6, 2008 10:26 AM EDT
Guns shouldn''t be given to people with a history of mental illness. That might exclude most politicians.
Reply to this comment
See all 72 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: