Comments on: Judge Rejects Bush's Stance On Wiretaps

Says Current FISA Law Does Not Allow Executive Branch To Overstep Law

[achilles281]

URSODUMB one ugly prick.....dirt bag of bush chimp kind...ah ah.lol.

[rudy654-2009]

6 warnings, Richard Clarke BEGGING for a cabinet level meeting on the threat for 9 MONTHS before the attacks, warnings from foreign intelligence agencies, and NUMEROUS warnings ignored by Chevron employee Condoleeza Rice aren''''t Bush administration FAILURES.

No -- Clinton gets ALL the blame for EVERYTHING that happened for a full YEAR after he left office. (I don''''t know how, but apparently that''''s how failure supporting republicans view it.)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by hungry1968 at 01:09 AM

Yeah, they act like Clinton received the dammm warning and failed to pass it on to the next president for eight years. If it had been anyone else other than a republican president, they would have happily assigned the blame to the individual if he had been president barely one month. This man was president for nearly a year, and somehow all the warnings he received that you just mentioned were someone else''s fault. Desperate in their worship of their man-god. Yet, they gleefully hope in secret and in public that if Obama is elected that the country have another 9/11. Can you believe the thinking of these people???

[formrusmcsgt]

A federal judge said that President Bush does not have the constitutional authority to overstep the law....
---

A concept that dubya has had difficulty understanding since he took office....

[timothyone-2009]

Bush oil people were in Texas in failed negotiations with the Taliban government of Afghanistan a few short weeks before 9-11. The deal they were working on fell through and 9-11 was the result. If you don''t already know this to be fact you have done not nearly enough to educate yourself about the greedy, stone-cold Bush regime. 9-11 only happened after American oil failed to get what it wanted from the Taliban from across the table. True monsters are running big oil, and big oil is running the world.

[hungry1968]

So you are saying that 9 months (nearly a year) wasn''''t enough time for your president to learn how to pay attention to critical warnings and act with decision to prevent the events of 9/11 when that was what they were doing in Europe?

Posted by rudy654 at 11:03 PM : Jul 04, 2008




The fascist worshipers, (including McSame supporters), give Bush a free pass on 9/11.

6 warnings, Richard Clarke BEGGING for a cabinet level meeting on the threat for 9 MONTHS before the attacks, warnings from foreign intelligence agencies, and NUMEROUS warnings ignored by Chevron employee Condoleeza Rice aren''t Bush administration FAILURES.

No -- Clinton gets ALL the blame for EVERYTHING that happened for a full YEAR after he left office. (I don''t know how, but apparently that''s how failure supporting republicans view it.)

[hungry1968]

"Judge Rejects Bush''s Stance On Wiretaps
Says Current FISA Law Does Not Allow Executive Branch To Overstep Law"





Isn''t this the SAME FISA law that Obama was called a "flip-flopper" for supporting?

LOL!!!!

The Bush / McSame regime is funny!!!

[rudy654-2009]

Obviously, because you believe that Clinton''''s EIGHT YEARS were not enough.

Hypocritical P.O.S.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by DemWatcher at 11:37 PM

That is the stupidest post I have ever read. What a desperate slime bag you are that feels that his president needed all the time in the world to react to warnings of plane hijackings. You must have been a slow child in school, because you sure are stupid now. Piece of excrement that you are.

[zertrat]

Dear Demwatcher,

Instead of Fox, i recommend Kermit the Frog. Better sources, better integrity, better soul. Your anger blisters out like an adolescent denied violent video games. Chill brother. America will be better again when Republicans are gone.

[zertrat]

Its very simple:
Bush was illegal and unconstitutional from the beginning. The public and the media caved. Slowly the American justice system claws back. Will we ever be the true America again? Doubtful.

[demwatcher]

"If you want to shut up like the Fox news people tell us to do who have met in the whitehouse, that''''s fine. We have the right to do whatever we can. I certainly prefer open communication and freedom of speech in order to communicate our worries over calls to any violence. So I for one will continue to communicate as we all have the right to do so under the Constitution, even if Herr Bush says that it is just a god-*** piece of paper.

Posted by ttinsly at 08:55 PM : Jul 04, 2008"

And, in your ignorance, you support the Fairness Doctrine that the Democrats want to shove down our throats. Read up on it, understand what it means, and shake in fear for your rights.

[demwatcher]

"So you are saying that 9 months (nearly a year) wasn''''t enough time for your president to learn how to pay attention to critical warnings and act with decision to prevent the events of 9/11 when that was what they were doing in Europe?

Posted by rudy654 at 11:03 PM : Jul 04, 2008"

Obviously, because you believe that Clinton''s EIGHT YEARS were not enough.

Hypocritical P.O.S.

[rudy654-2009]

Bush was in office ..what, 9 months before 9/11. Clinton knew about Osama for how many years?
Yeah Posted by patriot_tx1 at 11:20 AM

So you are saying that 9 months (nearly a year) wasn''t enough time for your president to learn how to pay attention to critical warnings and act with decision to prevent the events of 9/11 when that was what they were doing in Europe?

[rowdywicca]

Strange isn''t it...Congress just passed another bill, that supports wiretapping...and left the door wide open for it.

Thanks a LOT democrats for NOT doing the job we sent you to Washington to do!

And thanks a LOT Barak Obama for coming out in support of it and backed the democrats into a corner so they had to pass it so as not to appear to show your stupidity!

[9SLING]

I was only playing devils advocate by pointing out what i did in that last comment... I think that if the CIA needs to tap wires they will whether its legal or not. They always have. Making this an issue in the Supreme Court is a waste of time and money.

[9SLING]

Its funny how the same people that whine about their right to privacy are largely the same people that want the 2nd amendment to go away.

[apprxam]

WHere the hell was this kind of judge in 2006. You''d think the scalia was the only one sitting on the circuit the last three years.

[achilles281]

excellent point ...some of us come here for fun....and wrestling match...

[besscannon-2009]

I am wondering---don''t you all know our comments printed here mean nothing? I have stopped writing my thoughts because I honestly feel it is a waste. There are forces running our country that will do as they want, in spite of how the people feel. So, why upset yourself putting down your feelings and thoughts here when they mean nothing?

[irliberal]

I''''m all for wiretapping the calls to folks in Saudi Arabia. They openly hate us, and there''''s just too much at stake.

Get them outta our country.

Posted by aggiekat2004 at 07:27 PM

Aggiekat isn''t an american, he obviously doesn''t know ANYTHING about what being an american is all about. He''s just a racist, hateful bigot using the word "lib" like a curse because he - quite simply - doesn''t know any better.

Aggie: You may have been born in the USA, but you know NOTHING about America, what it stands for, and how a patriot should act. People like you are the underbelly of society, striking out against all that isn''t within your predefined judgements.

[aggiekat2004]

Oh, and in regular criminal cases they can''t use evidence that was improperly obtained, even if it''s critical to the case??

In my opinion this organization improperly obtained evidence. It''s unusable, if you want to play the stupid game that the liberals play.