Comments on: Bush: Ruling May Free Terrorists In U.S.
White House Lashes Out Again At Supreme Court Decision On Gitmo Detainees
Add a Comment See all 223 Comments
- I expected more of our leaders on the dawn of 9-12 and as in the past it did not come to be. mass carpet bombing would have stopped this sooner with less casulities on the side of the oppressed in that region.still the body count goes up and the innocent still dying.
- Reply to this comment
- You know what they say about sh*t? If you throw enough, some is bound to stick. With lies it''s the same. If you repeat a lie often enough, some will believe it, add to it, repeat the new version, and some others will believe it. And so on. And if the listener is scared-still by nature and character to start with, it''s that much easier.
- Reply to this comment
- Zerato
I do not have fear , just stating a fact. - Reply to this comment
- There Bush goes again with the fearmongering...
- Reply to this comment
- Bin Laden has been executing rank and file Arabs for many years. The Saudis ordered the region cleared of common folk. They have interests in petroleum, poppies, and sky scrapers there. Bin Laden is paid good money by them to kill off Taliban, Al Qada, or any other militant group. George W. Bush is a willing lackey of the Saudis. They ordered him to support a price rise for a barrel of oil to $200, by this year''s end.
- Reply to this comment
- If this Boob President sez this we all know he''s a damned lier and and a fear monger as far as the American people are concerned . Lets face it "He''s nuts"!
- Reply to this comment
- A disgruntled islamic terroist coming to your town soon. Enjoy
Posted by whiskyrocker
Fear and Shock coming to you by the press and dubya. Nothing but fear about something taht can not happen - Reply to this comment
- If the bush admin have no evidence taht the detainees ever broke any law or are terrorist, why would they want to keep them locked up. If they have the evidence, that woudl get them past a habeas corpus hearing. It is just more scare tactics on the part of the Bush (scare me now or scare me later) admin
- Reply to this comment
- gw bush and cheney with rumsfeld and a few more are the reason they are so many terriost today. Them have aided the building of terriost cells in American than all the rest of the people in the world and it was done out of greed for oil. We all see what it got us yesterday it was 145. $ a barrel Thanks mr. president, you simple lame brain idiot the thing I find so discussing is that gw and his old buddy either dodge the draft of deserter rather than serve.
Frank Bowers - Reply to this comment
- Politics aside, the only historically unique aspect of the present and irreversible decline of the United States is the number of firearms available to the masses. Not for revolutionary purposes, but to shoot each other for a bag of meal. Ultimately, of course, their problem will be how to stay warm in the dark.
On the brighter side, problems of terrorism and energy have no effect on the minority who own 95% of the wealth. They%u2019ll survive nicely, and always have. As an exemplary and greatly admired US citizen once proclaimed, %u201CI can hire one half the poor to kill off the other half%u201D. - Reply to this comment
- A disgruntled islamic terroist coming to your town soon. Enjoy
- Reply to this comment
- and may they free these ''''totally innocent people'''' in your city
----
Posted by libsluv2spit at 02:53 PM : Jul 04, 2008
I have no problem with that.
After all thay have already let go 900 or so that they had been holding for years in Gitmo. Seems strange they held them all those years and could not come up with one shred of evidence to charge them with. - Reply to this comment
- as a matter of fact..we should release them all in san francisco and boston..let see how far a ''liberal'' would fight for that freedom
- Reply to this comment
- t may also free totaly innocent people.......
Posted by Flajoe1 at 01:37 PM : Jul 04, 2008
+ report abuse
*****
and may they free these ''totally innocent people'' in your city - Reply to this comment
- ===This is why liberals have no place in America''''s future - because with liberal making America policy, America will have no future.===
Posted by OneAmerican
I see you have only one talking point to cut n paste today, so I''ll paste my response (again).
Without libs believing in our laws and our Constitution, we would be a country run by people like you - fear mongers who think that dictatorship run by the rich white male is the only way to save the country.
Threats to America are nothing new. Since the birth of the nation, there have always been a$$holes trying to take us down. Islamic terrorists are just the latest. And in the list of most dangerous US opponents, these bunch of cave dwellers don''''t even make the top five. And in 200+ years, we are still here - WITHOUT having to ignore our own laws or dishonor ourselves with the kind of behavior that the enemy uses. - Reply to this comment
- Like all politicians or people in power it is never their fault when something goes wrong. If the price of oil were to go down he would be on TV every night taking credit for it..
Posted by Flajoe1
Agreed, and they shouldn''t take credit for it. In a free market economy the influence that an administration''s policies have over the prices of goods are very limited. The Dept of the Treasury can obviously raise or lower interest rates, and the FTC and SEC can relax or tighten regulation, but that''s pretty much it. - Reply to this comment
- Agreed, but I don''''t think George W Bush is personally responsible for the increase in the price for a barrel of oil.
---
Posted by zoopster1 at 01:46 PM : Jul 04, 2008
Like all politicians or people in power it is never their fault when something goes wrong. If the price of oil were to go down he would be on TV every night taking credit for it.. - Reply to this comment
- Why did smaller compact cars sales take of during the oil crisis of the 70''''s? Why do you think Toyota and Honda are a dominant force in America to this day.
Posted by curse914
Ah yes, but why did larger cars start outselling those smaller types again in the 1990s and early 2000s? And why did the aforementioned Toyota and Honda introduce large gas guzzler models themselves?
That goes right back to my earlier point. People demanded it, that''s why. Toyota and Honda didn''t take over the car market back in the 70s because they just naturally built smaller cars. Ever drive any from that period? Even theirs were clunkers too, just like ours were. At first anyway.
No, those companies dominate now because they RESPOND to the DEMANDS of the CUSTOMERS better than their US competitors did, and they also have a REPUTATION for building more RELIABLE products. Those things carry a lot of weight with people. - Reply to this comment
- Economic ruin is the best strategy of them all.
The Cold War was won by out spending Russia to the point of economic collapse. Without an economy you can not fight a war much less win a war. I see failure where you see success.
Posted by curse914
Agreed, but I don''t think George W Bush is personally responsible for the increase in the price for a barrel of oil. There are too many other factors at work and his actions (or idiocies) alone do not make the difference.
He might be responsible for the increase in gas prices though. Out here in Los Angeles, gas is about $4.50 a gallon. Of that, approximately $3.40 is state and federal taxes. That means that the real price of that gallon of gas TO THE CONSUMER is only $1.10. State law requires gas stations to post this information, and I read it from a pump I was using at an Arco station in San Fernando Valley.
That sounds more like the socialist way to control demand to me: just tax the living heck out of it. But... if Bush wants to make himself and his friends (more) rich, wouldn''t they move to REDUCE the taxes, thus spiking demand and increasing the price the normal 11th grade Econ way? - Reply to this comment
- The Great Emperor Bush II has stated that because of the recent Supreme Court ruling restoring "habeas corpus" and the rule of some kind of Constitutional law back in the USSA, we could have "dangerous terrrrrrorrists" walking the streets of the USSA.
However, not a word was mentioned about the "terrrrrorrists" walking the streets already; people like Karl Rove, Alberto Gonzales, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, "Scooter" Libby, and other members of the Great Emperor''s court.
Besides, the Court might order prisoners freed, but it didn''t say where, and the Great Emperor already has destinations planned out for those "terrrrrrorrists" at Gitmo that the Emperor does not want around. Places like Antartica, the Artic Circle, and the Galapagos Islands!
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
sig heil, DEFINITELY MORE OF THE SAME, McCain!!!! - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
