Comments on: Feds Weigh Profiling-Based Investigations

Justice Dept. Likely To Let FBI Investigate Americans Based On Race, Other Traits Alone, No Evidence Necessary

[fixhist]

I wonder,if the traffic tickets written by various counties relying on revenue earned by traffic flow on Interstate Highway,will it add up to trigger preliminary terrorism investigations against people which were otherwise compulsory suspect due to obvious factors as race,countries they travelled,etc previously.

Like many other obvious suspects of being potent of act of terrorism, "fixhist" has Quite a few speeding tickets,which had been contested or stand paid.

I think, it will be productive for FBI to present case for "extra work for exploring & adding up the obvious,or identifiable names from counties all across America,FBI can engage the services of known terrorism expert companies,or big ticket people like Daniel Pipes, Alexis Debant,Little green footbals, so on and so forth"

While considerable reduction in Tax dollar fundings to these entities has occurred in recent months,But it is in the interest of America to keep these companies or entities in businesses. Without fundings these people will go jobless,and all blogs which rely on such govt fundings will dry out, It will be too boring for "Neocon rodents" to stop doing what they had been doing from aftermath of 911.

This year July 4th,America national day will be celebrated by many,many obvious terrorist profile holders to stay home to try to make or rare babies. Off course gas prices has a part in this decision.

God Bless America,again.
You must know,the trouble she is in.
[Michael Moore]

[namoey]

well floyd, what can i say to that? what is to be said of foreknowledge. that prescience is just another brand of self-medication, if it does not sufficiently propagate?

[namoey]

Joe1020,

when was the last time an american plane could afford to fly?

[sleepyric]

Joe McCarthy never made it to president. GW Bush is worse. I hope all the gun nuts and evangelicals are happy with the regime we have. Hope they don''t start investigating them. Seems everybody will be fair game.

[tbbaot]

Profiling has been the cornerstone of police investigation for centuries. It is only in the feel good PC world we live in today, that it gets looked at.
The Justice Department should proceed with plans to allow it. Maybe then we can stop strip searching grandma at the airport

[joe1022joe]

Grandmothers from Omaha aren''''t the problem. It''''s about time we started investigating the people most likely to be terrorists. Everybody knows what ethnic groups terrorists are most likely to come from, but we''''ve all been so damned afraid to call a spade a spade. EOE shouldn''''t govern any part of our defense or security intelligence policy.

[joe1022joe]

Folks, when was the last time a plane owned by a US airline was attacked, hijacked, or used as a weapon by anyone other than an Arab or non-Arab Moslem? This doesn''t mean we should close out eyes to other possible threats, but security investigations should not be hampered by EOE concerns.

[namoey]

whatithink,

general principles and general implmentation are too often the ends of separate means. when one has the record of the attempted overthrow of Roosevelt in 1934 and the aborted design for a fascist government in the us, when one has the record of a grandad and his grandson''s comparable actions here in the united states, i really see no need to employ some stupid german painter, or the sorry mistakes of a miserable little adventure to prop up dominoes in order to make the telling point at hand in regard the improving powers of our federal bureau of investigation, that will soon visit a home near you.

the net is cast, and the catch is captured soon, now

[whatithink-2009]

FloydZepp2,

Yes, they wrap themselves around in blind patriotism until they are sufficiently brainwashed.

[floydzepp2]

the point is your a bit late coming to your exceptions to the propriety of P.A.T.R.I.O.T.

Posted by namoey at 06:57 AM : Jul 03, 2008
---------

Not this boy, I''ve been opposed to PATRIOT since before day one.

[whatithink-2009]

"Profiling is a word that folks use to stalwart truth against them like folks use the term racist, etc.

Posted by cfin5"

Actually, the people who ignore truths are the ones who think these are only words.

[namoey]

What is so deliciously ironic is the unitary executive''s solemn reassurance, promise, back in sept 2001 that P.A.T.R.I.O.T. was not, and never would, apply to the American People themselves. I remember that statement as clearly as it was yesterday afternoon. Where were you folks then, complaining?

then old johnny ashcroft got onto the charlie rose show on public tv in feb of 2002, four months after the passage of that act, and johnny said to charlie: Patriot is a law passed by congress, and like any other law of the nation applies to every person of the nation.

the point is your a bit late coming to your exceptions to the propriety of P.A.T.R.I.O.T.

[floydzepp2]

Posted by FloydZepp2 at 06:51 AM : Jul 03, 2008----- Oh by the way, grow up dude.

Posted by cfin5 at 06:54 AM : Jul 03, 2008
-------

Oh, by the way, you grow up. Quit being such a cowering little frightened girl.

Protect the Constitution. Act like a man for once in your life.

[floydzepp2]

FloydZepp2,

Exactly. In the same way you have to wonder what the government was thinking when it made so many prisons "for profit." What "for profit" prison shareholder wants to see a reduction in the crime rate?

Posted by whatithink at 06:52 AM : Jul 03, 2008
-------------

Yep.

And what''s so scary is that I''ll bet cfin5 and joe1022joe and the others who support this reduction of constitutional rights claim to be "Republicans".

What a scary hoot.

[cfin5]

Posted by FloydZepp2 at 06:51 AM : Jul 03, 2008----- Oh by the way, grow up dude.

[floydzepp2]

All that is really happening is this prohibition will be dropped, not enhanced.
---------

Yeah, right, just like the property seizures laws and usage didn''t skyrocket after it was first proposed for drug dealers only.

[whatithink-2009]

FloydZepp2,

Exactly. In the same way you have to wonder what the government was thinking when it made so many prisons "for profit." What "for profit" prison shareholder wants to see a reduction in the crime rate?

[floydzepp2]

Posted by joe1022joe at 06:43 AM : Jul 03, 2008
----------

Another cowering little girl NASCAR fan willing to give away other people''s rights for a false sense of security.

[cfin5]

cfin5,

I think there is more danger in profiling. If you know what the profile is, you just have to find someone who doesn''''t fit the profile to commit the crime. That happened not too long ago when an Irish woman tried to took a bomb on a plane.

Posted by whatithink at 06:42 AM : Jul 03, 2008----- Profiling is a word that folks use to stalwart truth against them like folks use the term racist, etc. All that is really happening is this prohibition will be dropped, not enhanced. This set them on "equal footing" with us. I don''t see it as common sense to not keep our eyes open the other way either because who knows whats gonna happen?......Gotta go, nice talking to you.

[whatithink-2009]

namoey,

I propose to you that a power-hungry government may be the true lowest common denominator. Remember the Gulf of Tonkin. Remember Hitler starting a fire at the Reichstag and blaming his enemies in order to increase his control over the country.