Comments on: Sex Teacher Expected To Cop Lesser Plea

Lawyer For Teacher Accused Of Having Sex With 13-Year-Old Student Says She'll Plead Guilty To Lesser Charge

[kkcbs]

Boy, there''s a lotta pisstoff people on these comment sites. Are all of you really that out-of-sorts today?

[nlm2383]

She should get a lot more than a few years in prision AND she should be required to register as a *** offender. She should also NEVER be allowed to teach again...

[nssherlock1]

As for the women, something similar to castration could be used. Posted by au_fait




A plug?!?!?!?!?

[faith_in_w]

She will get off with a slap on the wrist. This sick society doesnt care when boys get raped by old women. there are too many feminists to make sure that females get off easy.

[mbcsmith]

She should have just "done him" in Vermont. The state that loves pedophiles. She would have gotten a week in jail and hearty pat on the back from the most LIB state in the union.

[madeupnews]

It would have to be a 13 year that did it with her. I don''t think you could even drink her pretty.

[ianlou]

It cracks me up how stories like these always have a picture of the Perpetrator as if their appearance is important to understand the crime:

"She had *** with her student? whats she look like"?

[au_fait]

Why is it that a woman will be given or allowed to plea to reduced charges. From reading it appears the prosecutors screwed up to an extent, but if this was a case of gender reversal and a male teacher slept with a 13 year old girl, he would be fried. Yes, I do agree all child predators should be taken care of, but we should not distinguish between men or women. I wonder if castration would be a better choice for men as this should stem all future urges. As for the women, something similar to castration could be used.

[toldyouso12]

CORRECTION:

But those who promote "globalism" had best understand capitalism, which is to maximize profit and increase market share (or monopolise it) to do this, the most important tools are war and populations--war to open up new markets and resources, populations to use as workers AND GROOM AS CONSUMERS-the cheapest population "wins"*. Your "globalism" may seem like the wave of the future, but for those of us in the middle class, it spells the beginning of the end of us having a home, cars, etc--because we would end up as servants, to the new rich, and only generations later--would our descendants have a chance to recoup--if at all.


*The Iraq war is not just about oil, it is about grooming potential new consumers and also integrating them into the American hegemony. With the EU and China now being economic powers SUPERIOR to the US, we must either solidify NAFTA AND CAFTA or find new markets to tap. And we WILL tap them--like China and Japan, the west is prepared to invade and force economic partnerships if the countries will not join us willingly. both those countries were told to either trade with us--or have a war. (Perry in early 20th century and the Opium wars with Britain for China in the 1800s)

Posted by toldyouso12 at 07:33 AM : Jul 02, 2008

[toldyouso12]

Posted by prometheus41 at 07:23 AM : Jul 02, 2008

There can be no successful intergration into a "Global society" without destroying the American middle class as we know it. In order for equilbrium in globalism to be achieved, we all must make comparable salaries in most countries for the same work. This means that Americans would have to continually lose jobs while companies maximized profits and could not regain those jobs until we make LESS or equal to the other countries--this would then force businesses to reconsider hiring us as we would be cheaper than where they are now. To get to that point, we would have to have a much lower standard of living. The pendulum will always eventually swing back this way. But those who promote "globalism" had best understand capitalism, which is to maximize profit and increase market share (or monopolise it) to do this, the most important tools are war and populations--war to open up new markets and resources, populations to use as workers--the cheapest population wins. Your "globalism" may seem like the wave of the future, but for those of us in the middle class, it spells the beginning of the end of us having a home, cars, etc--because we would end up as servants, to the new rich, and only generations later--would our descendants have a chance to recoup--if at all.

[toldyouso12]

We can return and build over their rotting fetid ''''retiree looking for affordable health care in a Republican parasite''''s nightmare'''' corpses.

Posted by prometheus41 at 07:23 AM : Jul 02, 2008


For all the time Nancy Naive has been posting on these boards, her position has been as an ardent Democrat, hater of unnecessary wars and castigator of George Bush. Nancy may be many things, and may have many views you do not agree with--but being a parasitical Republican is not one of them.

[squidly8]

hamiltonGRAD has posted here before. The usually whack job comments. It isn''t her fault because a man made her do it from some long ago emotional scarring. Bottom line is that she knew right from wrong and chose wrong regardless of whatever speculating you want to do. Send her to prison with the exact same sentence as any man that committed the same crime. That is what feminists want anyway isn''t it? Equal pay for equal work. She should get ''paid'' equally for the ''work'' she did.

If you truly are a college prof, I am seriously scared of what comes out of your classroom.

[toldyouso12]

Yes, there is. And, let`s hope it stays that way. The day we are satisfied that the system is working perfectly is the day we are all made slaves to it.

Regards,

Posted by Nancy_Naive at 06:14 AM : Jul 02, 2008


Wrong. The day we acquiesce to the system by accepting it and not fighting back (like you appear to suggest) is the day we are made slaves to it--as we all are. Which is why we get tazed, the rich get little to no sentences, and the rest of us can have our rights suspended, be eavesdropped on by anyone and can be shot, killed and police acquitted, even if the entire thing is captured on video.

Regards, indeed.

[toldyouso12]

o those writing below: Why are so many men so angry ? I have many answers for this,so I need not be offended, rather I am cautious and vigilant and try to teach my students a better way to behave, without anger issues clouding our mentation. Clearly, some schools and even female teachers (klew) are dominated by MALEness to the point of denial of reality.
Just look around at your so called TEEN age boys. They are men. That is why the ARMY recruits them !
This teacher is a focal point, an emblem of all that our society claims but fosters itself in a mirror of lies. Who should be in jail ? perhaps the boys gym coach !

Posted by HamiltonGRAD at 02:25 AM : Jul 02, 2008


Hmmmm yet another fake, psuedo educated troll wannabee-- pretending to be:

A.a woman
B. educated
C. informed
D. a spokesperson for God knows what with his/her head jammed firmly up her/his own azz. LMAO

We, women, don''t believe your tripe, let alone the men and you sound like that other idiot pretend "college professor" who used to post crazy feminist ******* so far fetched and fringed that even ardent feminist cringed in horror.

Give it up--no real college professor would preface their comments with their credentials, their actual verbiage would speak for them--the moment you do that, is the moment you underline that you are a poseur.

[toldyouso12]

"He was an illegal immigrant in the United States when he left with Peterson. He is back in Nebraska temporarily after being granted humanitarian parole by the Department of Homeland Security."

*** is humanitarian parole? A 14 year old that admits to having sexxx with an adult but does not consider her his girlfriend. (he probably has to say that to keep from getting ribbed by his friends for screeeewing such a dog) But here''s the deal: this kid is obviously not some innocent--the woman is guilty and should be put in prison, but the kid is illegal and should remain in Mexico--at the very least, when next he decides to "indulge" an adult, we don''t have to let it be an American who is stupid and nasty enough to go with a child.

No way should this kid be allowed back here--if for no other reason than as an illegal--he does not belong here--and if he is illegal, odds are so are his parents. Send them all home, out of work Americans need their former jobs.

[formrusmcsgt]

These women who are attracted to boys are obviously arrested in their adolescence....

[dsr57]

Just look around at your so called TEEN age boys. They are men

Posted by HamiltonGRAD
---------------------------------------------------

Yeah, and look at all the teenage girls running around looking like WOMEN...I don''t see your point because if I banged one of them I was STILL GO TO JAIL. You sence of perception is warped ! !

[dsr57]

As a feminist and a college Professor (Women and the World), I an shocked that this poor woman has been treated as if she is a criminal.
She is a victim.
What type of social / school pressures was she under at this school. She is obviously an attractive person, and we need to know if she was the center of "jokes" by male staff or students, thus forcing her into a role she did not want to play . Just because this was a ''''boy" does not mean that he could not prey upon a female. In fact he sounds pretty "grown up". He is not an 8 year old.
As an adminstrator, I see the stress that women teachers have in dealing with any males over the age of 12, even so called "teenagers" - In truth, they are the most free to dominate girls in the classroom. In doing so , they want to step up to dominate the teacher as well. Sports for boys should be banned, as they encourage Boys to act like men, we do not need football, or baseball, or wrestling, as they just encourage the stereotype of MALEness, when in fact school should do all we can do downplay those primitive impulses.
This woman, like all woman , is not to blame. We all all.


Posted by HamiltonGRAD

---------------------------------------------------

HA HA HA HA That''s awesome ! ! Do you by chance have a mullet, wear flannel shirts with the sleeves torn off and eat carpet????

[dsr57]

Why didn''t they just leave him there???

[cozzicon]

"As a former Marine, and as a Scoutmaster for many years, I can say that we should support sporting activities for all young males. It is healthy for them; it helps promote traits that will serve them well in later years. And, I support those young males who are not interested in conflict sports, to those I try to lead them to fun and less competitive sports, such as volleyball which is more fun to play than basketball or football which is often accompanied with long tiring practice and long periods of waiting for your chance to play. But sports are very important for all children male or female.

Most all boys are driven by hormones by the time they are 13, and boys will experiment with many forms of se*x, this is the time to keep watch over them, while not interfering with what comes naturally to them, just be there for them when they have questions, let them explore with their peers, and keep adult predators away from them - for the sake of the our children who are on the cusp of entering adulthood. Treat them as we would like to be treated, and most boys will become great men and leaders. It takes conflict and competition to make a great leader, Scouting, and sports will give that to them, and the Marine Corps will to the rest."-- Posted by KEITHGARDNER

So the Boy Scouts are accepting G*A*Y scouts now?