Comments on: Governors Buck Bush On Offshore Drilling
Schwarzenegger, Others Vow To Fight Attempts To Tap Ocean Reserves
- BTW, I''m a conservative, but I''m not a robot. I voted for Bush both times (watch Beastie call me a liar, as liars always do), not because he was good, but because Gore and Kerry were WORSE.
I blame Clinton for causing the mess we''re in today, and I blame Bush for failing to do anything to get us out of it. Clinton is a S.O.B., Bush has been a major disappontment. They have one thing in common - THEY''''RE BOTH BABY BOOMERS. Born in the same year, even.
SIXTEEN YEARS OF BABY BOOMERS IS ENOUGH. Cut the partisan nonsense. Political party doesn''t matter any more. IT''S THE BOOMERS.
NO MORE BABY BOOMERS in public office.
Posted by txgrouch2004 at 01:20 PM : Jun 19, 2008
========================
Grouch, I would not call you a liar....I can tell you voted for G.W. twice. And, I think you came by your screen name honestly.
However, I''m not, given the definition of conservative, convinced you are nearly as staunch a conservative as I am.
Being a baby boomer is not the denominator you seek.
Bill Clinton was a constant dissapointment to me. And, when I saw him in such a hurry after leaving office to build that big money laundering operation on the shores of the Arkansas River near Little Rock, so he could convert all the graff he had the Chinese, N. Koreans etc. deposit into his numbered bank accounts in the Caymens I knew I wasn''t wrong.
BTW: The Boomer age ran up to 1963....OsamaObama is technically a "boomer". - Reply to this comment
- OK, you ARE a math moron.
[More name calling??]
Social Security is "heavy" because NOBODY HAS BEEN ABLE TO MODIFY IT. It''s such a fat, juicy DEMOCRAT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM that nobody can touch it.
Posted by txgrouch2004 at 01:10 PM : Jun 19, 2008
Can''t touch it?? What the heck are you smoking??
Please let me count the way the Democrats have touched it over the years:
It was touched once when the Democrats made it a manditory payroll tax.
It was touched again when the Democrats decided to dump the contributions into the general fund.
It was touched again when the Democrats decided to extend it''s benefits to new arrivals to America who have not contributed well over $200,000 to the program as I have.
It has been touched by the Democrats I can''t count the times as they raised the original voluntary contribution of 1% into the current government confiscation of 13.4%.
Sorry boys, but I''m simply not going to play your game of gratuitous name calling. Just the facts Ma''ame. - Reply to this comment
- The right wingers have always said we don''t need to worry about pollution, or overpopulation, or food shortages, or anything else because new TECHNOLOGY would save us. If we ever needed new technology, it is NOW to develop new fuels and sources of energy. But what is the right wing answer ? More exploitation of the same ancient resources, more "relaxation" of standards and environmental safeguards, more slash and burn, and this time making the Democrats the villains - for obstructing the consumer economy. Excuse us for wanting clean beaches, fresh air, and drinkable water Quaint ideas, I know. As long as we''re drilling for oil and burning coal, we''ll never progress to clean technologies. The Japanese will get there first.
- Reply to this comment
- fedupwithit1 asked
So what is ur answer to SS?
----------------
STOP VOTING FOR BABY BOOMERS.
Pick someone who cares ABOUT THE CONTRY, not him/herself. - Reply to this comment
- Beastof70 tripped
you come on back when you come down off that bad trip ya hear.
-----------------
You''re an ignorant boor. You''re the one who''s on a trip - or maybe YOU ARE a bad trip.
You can ask a local math teacher what a denominator is, and ask if 100 is the denominator in the percent formula... but you''re too arrogant and lazy, you''ll just wallow in ignorance and imagine that it''s EVERYONE ELSE who''s wrong.
I know you. - Reply to this comment
- What was it: Ogalthercy??
I''''m sure you''''ll become a better American, and I''''ll learn something I likely still won''''t care to know.
Posted by Beastof70
you summed it up with this statement. This is the complacency and laziness to really understand beyond your narrow notions of I work, I earn a paycheck and I hate anyone on disability or welfare. Well, the system can always use more oversight but big concentrations of wealth are the real threat to your posterity, not a few people in your perception undeserving of government paychecks.
Did you know that the "conservative" politicians you support receive socialized medicine, retirement and security details for life at your expense and yet throw propagandist rhetoric at the intellectually lazy to keep them at bay and protect their special fascist self serving way of life? - Reply to this comment
- BTW, I''m a conservative, but I''m not a robot. I voted for Bush both times (watch Beastie call me a liar, as liars always do), not because he was good, but because Gore and Kerry were WORSE.
I blame Clinton for causing the mess we''re in today, and I blame Bush for failing to do anything to get us out of it. Clinton is a S.O.B., Bush has been a major disappontment. They have one thing in common - THEY''RE BOTH BABY BOOMERS. Born in the same year, even.
SIXTEEN YEARS OF BABY BOOMERS IS ENOUGH. Cut the partisan nonsense. Political party doesn''t matter any more. IT''S THE BOOMERS.
NO MORE BABY BOOMERS in public office. - Reply to this comment
- When you prove them mathematically wrong, ALL THEY DO IS LAUGH.
Shows they never took the subject seriously in the first place.
And no, 100 is the MULTIPLIER, not the denominatior. You just proved what a math moron you are.
Posted by txgrouch2004 at 01:12 PM : Jun 19, 2008
===============
OOOOOkkkkkkaaaaaaaaayyyyy, now you come on back when you come down off that bad trip ya hear. - Reply to this comment
- Oligarchy-- is a form of government where political power effectively rests with a small elite segment of society (whether distinguished by wealth, family, military powers or spiritual hegemony). The word oligarchy is translated into "rule by few."
If you don''t care what the word means then I don''t know how you would consider yourself american. - Reply to this comment
- LOL
I dont like any of our choices for Pres. but every time Beastof70 calls him OsamaObama just makes me want to vote Dem just to shoot him the finger.
Posted by fedupwithit1 at 01:08 PM : Jun 19, 2008
=============
LOL!!!
Can you seriously believe, given what you''ve offered this board, anyone had any doubt as to whether or not you was a pervert worshipping, left wing pinko, un-American Democrat??
LOL!!!! - Reply to this comment
Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy.




