Comments on: Dem: Pentagon Sought Harsh Interrogations

Military Lawyers Objected In 2002 To Abusive Techniques, Top Senate Democrat Says

Add a Comment See all 115 Comments
by inventagod2 June 17, 2008 5:25 PM EDT

I am disappointed in our Pentagoons.
Reply to this comment
by frankson2 June 17, 2008 4:55 PM EDT
FOR ALL THE DIRT THE DEMS KEEP DIGGING UP NOBODY IS EVER HELD LEGALLY ACCOUNTABLE. IT MAKES A FEW HEADLINES AND FADE3 AWAY. WHEN ARE WE GOING TO SEE SOME JUSTICE SERVED UP?
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 June 17, 2008 4:27 PM EDT
Congress has finally "discovered" that Donald "Rummy" Rumsfeld was the one who sanctioned torture and mistreatment of prisoners at Gitmo!

Apparently "Rummy", having attended a "Rambo" film festival, came to believe that if Rambo could stand the pain of torture, so could the detainees and authorized the treatment, which was quickly endorsed by both VP Darth Vader Cheney and, according to that evil turncoat Scott McClellan, by the Great Emperor Bush II himself. Naturally, it didn''t matter that everything was illegal, so long as no one found out about it, and even if they did, what could they do about it? Lead a second American Revloution??

Now, with the Great Emperor Bush II about to exit the throne in the Oval Office (we hope!), the Great Emperor is contemplating, as a last act of his reign, a BLANKET AMNESTY for all those involved who worked for the Great Emperor for ANYTHING done from the beginning of time until the end of time, thus preventing the evil, cowardly Whimpo-crats from causing legal grief for those loyal to the cause of neocon Fascist Nazism!

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
sig heil, DEFINITELY MORE OF THE SAME, McCain!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by frankbowers June 17, 2008 3:41 PM EDT
I noticed some one spoke of beheading those captured or bought by large ransoms regardless of their guilt.
I, with 8 years of honorable service think it is time to behead those who broke our laws and run rough shod over our constitution. THOSE, Being to start with gw bush, next dic cheney, followed by a. gonzalez, rumsfield and the rest of the ba$****$ who has $crewed the American Rules of the GC to please themselves they used the men as the old Romans did with the lions and tigers, to see grown men suffer for no reason other than THEIR PESONAL pleasure.
I saw an article yesterday that gw bush might become a Catholic after leaving office I hope he does as they wil make it clear he can join all the churches and he is bound for hell and the fires of eternity with his friend the man with the horns and tail of fire.
I will leave the Catholic Church if he becomes a catholic. I nearly did so due to Blair joining the church but he was not quite the murder as gw bush and I do know I will head for the hills if he comes to my Church.
Frank Bowers of Austin, TX
Reply to this comment
by mrright5 June 17, 2008 3:40 PM EDT
Top 10 list of McSame National Security Objectives:

1. Surrender to Corporations
2. Surrender US border
3. Release all terrorist from Bush Admin
4. Return Gitmo to Taliban
5. Partner with Saudi Arabia for peace. ha
6. Raise taxes on middle class and call it a fee increase
7. Appoint Bush lackeys to key positions
8. Do what Pentagon moles tell him
9. Continue what G.W. did Increase national debt
10. Buy more depends and geritol
Reply to this comment
by mrright5 June 17, 2008 3:39 PM EDT
Mr. Right Wing Double Speak

Former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld

There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don''t know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don''t know we don''t know.
Reply to this comment
by mrright5 June 17, 2008 3:37 PM EDT
Top 10 list of McSame National Security Objectives:

1. Surrender to Corporations
2. Surrender US border
3. Release all terrorist from Bush Admin
4. Return Gitmo to Taliban
5. Partner with Saudi Arabia for peace. ha
6. Raise taxes on middle class and call it a fee increase
7. Appoint Bush lackeys to key positions
8. Do what Pentagon moles tell him
9. Increase national debt
10. Buy more depends
Reply to this comment
by neoconrcrazy June 17, 2008 1:27 PM EDT
Stupid, no wonder we are flat getting our Brains kicked out in this thing!! SIEG HEIL BUSH!! Dumb as a Box of Rocks!!

Posted by MCVet


hey bro - we''re sure lucky all these dumbos aren''t on the front line, or we''d be getting more than we''re getting now - these flat-liners haven''t a clue, they play "virtual war" on Tv screens where all you have to do is push the button!

Reply to this comment
by cfin5 June 17, 2008 12:55 PM EDT
Posted by MCVet at 09:12 AM : Jun 17, 2008----- Herr MCVet, you good little "notsee",....go take your daily Dangittol prescription. Your getting a little too excited for our enemies sake,....as usual.
Reply to this comment
by martel_v June 17, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
There appear to be a sizable number of people who are ignoring the fact that we are at war. - Posted by joe1022joe

There also appears to be a sizable number of people who are willfully ignoring the fact that we are wasting American lives and the wealth of the American people in a war which was, and is, more than obviously pointless in the extreme. Not only is it pointless, but it''s self-defeating. It has drastically reduced the ability to go after the terrorist organization which was the source of the attack on September 11, 2001. Look at that date again. September 11, 2001. 2001! SEVEN years ago...and we STILL aren''t tackling the real problem with the necessary resources because the delusionals who rule us never actually intended to.

They had OTHER priorities which they had publicly defined even before the election campaign in 2000. Among those other priorities, the invasion and occupation of Iraq on a more or less permanent basis was at the top of the list. Do your research. Look up the "Project For A New American Century"). Notice who signed it. Reseach the cabinet meeting the day after 9/11. Rumsfeld, among others, insisted on 9/12 that there would never be a better time to invade Iraq. Luckily for their prospects in 2004, Rice successfully argued against that on the premise that the American people would likely rise up in outrage at their behavior if they didn''t invade Afghanistan first since that was the ACTUAL source of the attack.
Reply to this comment
See all 115 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Does dad need a nursing home? Dr. LaPook talks with a geriatrician about navigating a difficult decision.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Family Ties Family Ties

    Meet Three Adoptees from Samoa and the Families on Opposite Ends of the World who Love Them

  • Nobel Peace Prize Concert Nobel Peace Prize Concert

    Artists from Around the World Rock Out in Oslo to Honor This Year's Laureate, President Obama

  • Diane Saywer Diane Saywer

    The Former "60 Minutes" Correspondent and "GMA" Co-Host is Now in the ABC News Anchor Chair

  • "Avatar" Gets Blue-Carpet Debut

    Long-Awaited Animation Film Gets Premiere in London

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Holly Sampson Undercover Holly Sampson Undercover

    Woman Who Claimed Sexual Affair with Tiger Woods is Paid Escort, Says Madam, Ads

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: