Comments on: Nuclear Reactor Applications Rising

Stagnant For Decades, Nuclear Energy Industry Rebounding

Add a Comment See all 30 Comments
by perceptions5 June 14, 2008 10:27 AM EDT
Good ! Now we need the Democrats and one of their "big donors", Eviro''s to stay the hell out of the way.

These two groups have screwed this country for thirty years.

The Enviro''s donating 10''s of millions of dollars to Dems campaigns and then the Dems blocking and outlawing virtually all "domestic" development and production of energy in America since the 1970''s

It took us thirty years to get in this hole and it''s going to take twenty years to get us out.

ONLY if the Dems and their big donor, Enviro''s STAY OUT OF THE WAY.

Just more facts on the history of this bad situation.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree4u June 14, 2008 8:30 AM EDT

Bechtel will be in no position to build any more nukes after their assets are seized and liquidated, to help pay some of the reparations that they owe.
Reply to this comment
by oneworldusa June 14, 2008 7:07 AM EDT
The extreme tree-huggers are one of the reasons fuel and energy costs are so high, not allowing infrastructure to grow with a growing population. For all the rest of us who want to live in modern civilization, they should all move to within walking distance to their schools or jobs, get rid of their cars and other fuel-driven vehicles, and live without power. And allow the government to create infrastructure for the rest of us before there is no place left to put it.
Reply to this comment
by jb01201a June 14, 2008 7:05 AM EDT
how''''s about we wait until the greedy energy companies start acting like responsible citizens? and besides, they can''''t even figure out what to do with the waste safely. would you trust an individual who couldnt clean up their own waste with a posistion where they could potentailly irradiate tens of hundreds of acres of american soil and water, and possibly a city, with reactor waste? maybe they could store it at your place bj0201...
Bla, Bla, Bla, the same *** out of you stupid libs - maybe I should used just one sheet of tiolet paper to wipe your ***. You libs are stupid !
Reply to this comment
by fightfascism June 14, 2008 6:39 AM EDT
how''s about we wait until the greedy energy companies start acting like responsible citizens? and besides, they can''t even figure out what to do with the waste safely. would you trust an individual who couldnt clean up their own waste with a posistion where they could potentailly irradiate tens of hundreds of acres of american soil and water, and possibly a city, with reactor waste? maybe they could store it at your place bj0201...
Reply to this comment
by marcosis78 June 14, 2008 4:46 AM EDT
Of course Bush wants to throw it in a mountaintous region such as Las Vegas. Then he figures its out of harms way, or something, but but he needs to come back to reality that if a nuclear plant were to go back online, thats just asking for a hack in or a terrorist attack seeing how perfectly fine our defense is (if we even have any money for it).

Bin Laden said that taking the towers down would crumble our economy didnt he? Well, it just goes to show that a crazy old terrorist is smarter than our own "well educated" president.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito June 14, 2008 4:28 AM EDT
I submitted my application years ago, and they STILL haven''t approved it yet.
Reply to this comment
by jb01201a June 14, 2008 3:30 AM EDT
Well lookie here at this stupid lib statement:
Don''''t count on it. Nuclear fission power production is a very expensive and dangerous dead-end and we will not allow any new plants to be built.

You don''t want us to build new oil rigs to drill, you don''t want us to build power plants for nuclear power, you don''t want any wind mills build because that might harm birds, and you don''t want us to use horses because their XXXX might cause some methane thing - what are we suppose to do ? You peopple are killing the world. We don''t have other methods for power. If we did, you probably, would have one of your new terrorist friends complain to the ACLU that a picece of molcule might cause you to have a hang nail. You people are stupid and dum. Enough said.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree4u June 14, 2008 3:11 AM EDT

Re: "The first could be built and operating by 2016."

Don''t count on it. Nuclear fission power production is a very expensive and dangerous dead-end and we will not allow any new plants to be built.
Reply to this comment
by shanev137 June 14, 2008 2:26 AM EDT
"We''re talking about a trillion-dollar investment in the nation''s power infrastructure," said Steve Kerekes, a spokesman for the Nuclear Energy Institute, the industry''s policy organization. "That''s a very substantial undertaking in providing the electricity that we all depend on.

----------

Yea....big deal.

That''s half of what we just wasted in Iraq.
Reply to this comment
See all 30 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (319 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: