Comments on: Official: Sect Leader's Son Not Abused

Child Welfare Worker Says Warren Jeff's 6-Year-Old Son OK; Hearings Under Way In Custody Case

Add a Comment See all 70 Comments
by yongamerica May 19, 2008 7:36 PM EDT
If they''''re BAASTARDS then they are good company with all the other illegitimates out there with one mother and but numerous "papas."
Posted by rudy654

Yep you said it, not me.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 19, 2008 7:34 PM EDT
rudy654 Even though FLDS claims to be Christian they are following the words of Satan. And for you defend them states that you too are a tool of the Devil.

My faith has nothing to do with htese criminals, their beliefs and your warped twisted belief you have to defend these criminals.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 May 19, 2008 7:34 PM EDT
Posted by yongamerica at 04:32 PM

If they''re BAASTARDS then they are good company with all the other illegitimates out there with one mother and but numerous "papas."
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 19, 2008 7:32 PM EDT
Allegations don''''t count.
Posted by rudy654

Rudy, Rudy, Rudy,
The courts have yet to begin to process the allegations. But several things are direct violations of the law of the USA and that is plural marriages are not allowed. Marriages to minors is not allowed.

Oh that''s right, these "marriages" aren''t recognized in the state of Texas, which makes every child born from this cult BA STARD S and the the children''s Mom''s W *****, and their Fathers lower than a well hung pig''s wang.

These are all facts and not conjecture nor allegations.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 May 19, 2008 7:30 PM EDT
This is a CULT, as shown by their isolationism. FDLS needs a little Darwinism. And finally the courts are starting to dish that out.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by yongamerica at 04:27 PM

Are you a Christian?
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 May 19, 2008 7:28 PM EDT
How about emotional, spiritual, and intellectual abuse.***************

I think teaching your kid that if he don''t believe in Jesus he''s going to burn forever in hell qualifies as emotional abuse. Shall we start removing all children from Christian homes? Let''s get started.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 19, 2008 7:27 PM EDT
The majority of these people have done absolutly nothing wrong as Dan9111 has pointed out.

The majority of FLDS have done absolutely everything wrong as society and the law of the US defines it. These people are no contributing to the betterment of the country. They are making their own. They leach off the welfare state. Their beliefs are counter of the core beliefs of the western world. This is a CULT, as shown by their isolationism. FDLS needs a little Darwinism. And finally the courts are starting to dish that out.
Reply to this comment
by May 19, 2008 7:26 PM EDT
No physical or sexual abuse, huh? How about emotional, spiritual, and intellectual abuse.
Are they properly preparing the sons for the day they get kicked out of the cult because they have become sexual competition for the grey bearded old daddy geezers?
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 May 19, 2008 7:24 PM EDT
And this sect has violated many civil rights! And why are you so blind to that fact?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by yongamerica at 04:22

That should be proven in court FIRST! Allegations don''t count.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 May 19, 2008 7:23 PM EDT
Anyway, the taking of children from their parents because other parents in the town were neglegent and abusive to their children is blatantly illegal. The majority of these people have done absolutly nothing wrong as Dan9111 has pointed out. Some of them were victims. Your republican views are shining through the cracks.
Posted by lochlan at 03:06 PM

I agree. Basically, the principle for taking the children was purely based on prejudice against their beliefs. That is a violation of due process and equal rights afforded under the Constitution. I probably would disagree with you on many other things. But here you are right.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 19, 2008 7:22 PM EDT
The violation of civil rights is a violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. Bet you don''''t know what it is.

And this sect has violated many civil rights! And why are you so blind to that fact?
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 19, 2008 7:21 PM EDT
They were only living their lives they way God had told them to do.

Posted by faith_in_w

Are you convinced that GOD, thinks these people are so special, that he''d talk to them directly and tell them to have and F uk as many ****** as they can? None of these women are legally married. They are HARLOTS and stew in deep sin. Their pimp husband cowards treat them like animals. And all this is from GOD''s word? Boy are you the sick one.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 May 19, 2008 7:20 PM EDT
The law prevails over beliefs. That''''s why you don''''t have to worry about me killing your sorry azz.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by yongamerica at 04:16 PM

Bullcaca! The violation of civil rights is a violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. Bet you don''t know what it is.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 May 19, 2008 7:19 PM EDT
The attorney for the boy''''s mother, Sharon Barlow, objected to the state plan for her to get the boy back, saying it wasn''''t clear enough. Barlow, 34, must take parenting classes, find a safe living environment and undergo a psychological evaluation, according to the plan.

Sounds pretty clear to me. What is here that is so difficult to understand? Appears to be all spelled out in plain English.
Posted by docpeter at 03:15 PM

I have come to realize that Americans, by and large, do not believe in constitutional protections even for those who are American. It is just so easy to allow prejudice to be the deciding factor. Sure, I consider them looney, but I also consider all the other so-called "good" Christians on here to be as looney with their nonsense about anti-Christ this and that. But I believe that people are innocent until proven guilty, and then, and only then, do they receive punishment like what is being meted out to these people who have not been proven guilty of anything.

All this is just a test pattern for a very slippery slope.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 19, 2008 7:16 PM EDT
They were only living their lives they way God had told them to do.
And not living the way the law told them to.

The law prevails over beliefs. That''s why you don''t have to worry about me killing your sorry azz.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 19, 2008 7:14 PM EDT
Buns up! How about a threesome or a foursome with those braided haired clones? Don''t worry, Daddy has enough to go around for all you B itches.
Reply to this comment
by docpeter-2009 May 19, 2008 6:27 PM EDT
FloydZeoo wrote, "Well you''''re obviously not very bright. Only Jeff''''s son has been addressed. And I take it you don''''t want the authorities looking into 45-year-old men doinking 12-year-old girls as long as Jesus approves?"

First of all the Mormons are not Christians, although they may try to appear that way. They DO NOT accept Jesus as the Mesiah. They consider Jesus to be the brother of Satan, both created by God. They do not believe in one God, but rather that there are many "levels" for God. They believe that God had multiple wives and children and that if we all "believe" we can also, one day, become God.

Nowhere in their belief system do they acknowledge or consider Jesus the Mesiah. they are an established sect following the teachings of Joesph Smith as well as Bringham Young, much like those that followed James Jones, David Karesh, etc. The only big differences is that they have lastyed longer.
Reply to this comment
by displeased May 19, 2008 6:24 PM EDT
Barlow, 34, must take parenting classes, find a safe living environment and undergo a psychological evaluation, according to the plan.
Posted by docpeter

They should make EVERYBODY do this before having children.
Reply to this comment
by docpeter-2009 May 19, 2008 6:15 PM EDT
The attorney for the boy''s mother, Sharon Barlow, objected to the state plan for her to get the boy back, saying it wasn''t clear enough. Barlow, 34, must take parenting classes, find a safe living environment and undergo a psychological evaluation, according to the plan.

Sounds pretty clear to me. What is here that is so difficult to understand? Appears to be all spelled out in plain English.
Reply to this comment
by lochlan-2009 May 19, 2008 6:06 PM EDT
"supports the doinking of 12-year-old girls by 45-year-old men as long as its a bunch of Jesus'''' Followers doing the doinking?"

Sorry Floyd Zepp, forgot I put that post there for you. Took the bait on the quotes too. It appears I got you a little steamed with those global warming facts. Well, don''t pull your money on your alternative energy stocks yet, the media haven''t given up on selling the masses.

Anyway, the taking of children from their parents because other parents in the town were neglegent and abusive to their children is blatantly illegal. The majority of these people have done absolutly nothing wrong as Dan9111 has pointed out. Some of them were victims. Your republican views are shining through the cracks.
Reply to this comment
See all 70 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (254 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: