Comments on: Official: Sect Leader's Son Not Abused

Child Welfare Worker Says Warren Jeff's 6-Year-Old Son OK; Hearings Under Way In Custody Case

Add a Comment See all 70 Comments
by rudy654-2009 May 20, 2008 6:13 AM EDT
Actually they were absolutely correct to take these children out of a situation that could even POSSIBLY be abusive until they can determine whether it is or not.
*********
Yeah, you little dictator you. I really don''t read much of your krap anymore Rowdy, you are pretty much a racist with a fascist tendency.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 May 20, 2008 6:11 AM EDT
Posted by RowdyTexan2

It seems like you need some counseling for the real world.
Reply to this comment
by wlmrtpatriot May 20, 2008 6:10 AM EDT
Yep this is appalling. Read this about these evil cultists..http://www.massnews.com./past_issues/2000/5_May/mayds4.htm
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 May 20, 2008 6:09 AM EDT
so that means she is a singler parent, getting welfare.
************
And you just happen to know this. Swell. You are crazy if you think that not having someone''s last name means they are on welfare. I bet you are on welfare, you fraud. You people make me sick.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 20, 2008 4:37 AM EDT
The FDLS pretends to have multiple marriages, when in fact not one of them are legal in any state of the Union."
NOT A SINGLE ONE IS RECOGNIZED BY ANY STATE IN THE WHOLE USA. THEREFORE EACH ONE OF THESE HOLIER THAN THOU PEOPLE ARE INFACT LIVING IN SIN IN THE EYES OF THE LORD.
Reply to this comment
by cpaide May 20, 2008 3:29 AM EDT
"...this uniquely mormon teaching."
Posted by cpaide

sorry, it''s not unique to mormons. jews practiced it; muslims also; other mid-eastern peoples; africans; many orientals--pretty much every culture on the planet.
Reply to this comment
by cpaide May 20, 2008 3:27 AM EDT
"The FDLS pretends to have multiple marriages, when in fact not one of them are legal in any state of the Union."
Posted by yongamerica

that''s only because the issue has yet to be litigated. the various state laws prohibiting polygamy are certainly as antiquated and unconstitutional as the once-prevalent laws against inter-racial marriages.

note that the states dare not prosecute the texas mormans for violation of anti-polygamy laws, as litigation would reveal that polygamy is, in fact, allowable under the constitution. this would put the salt lake mormons (and mitt romney) in a difficult position, with no excuse for not practicing this uniquely mormon teaching.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 20, 2008 2:59 AM EDT
Wonder if they''''''''ll raid the projects and get the teenage pregnant women out of there too!!

The comparison is apples and rotten FDLS eggs. The FDLS believes its religous beliefs over rule the laws of the USA. The FDLS pretends to have multiple marriages, when in fact not one of them are legal in any state of the Union. Therefore these "pure" people are really living in the sins they try so desperately try to shield themselves from.

The unwed mothers in the inner cities, and rich suburbs do not claim to be purer than the rest of the world like the FDLS. These women acted freely and some became pregnant in those actions whereas the FDLS women were told who they were going to "marry" and had no control over their *** lives, in essence being raped at the man''s will. The FDLS women are nothing more than *** machines. When an FDLS man falls from favor, his concubines are taken from him and then the harlots are given to another man. The women again have no say in this.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 20, 2008 2:05 AM EDT
"the principle for taking the children was purely based on prejudice against their beliefs. That is a violation of due process and equal rights afforded under the Constitution."and nothing is furthest from the truth of the matter. The reason for taking the children into custody was to guarantee they had civil rights as minors in a highly prejudicial religiously intolerant situation. It is indoctrination and abuse to coerce a minor into *** and underage marriage, among other potentious acts in order to enforce the coercian of these minors,therefore the situation and homelife was abusive,belief system aside. Belief system does not justify the breaking of secular law, although many humans have attempted the use and creation of religions for this purpose, and financial gain, and power gain, and authority gain, Iwould stop and scratch myself now but I''''m female,oh why the hell not!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by soshljustic at 10:30 PM : May 19, 2008

I rather think under our Constitution that even a 13 year old girl has the right to decide whether she wants to be raped by some sick old pervert salivating over the next available virgin.

The United States Constituion not any place, any time, allows someone calling themselves a prophet of any religion to determine the fate of other human being, and punish them into obedience. Nor is such prophet, allowed to set himself above the law of the land.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 20, 2008 2:01 AM EDT
If the child wasn''''t abused why does the mother have to have counseling?

This is your first witness against the state of Texas.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by cbscrash07 at 08:09 PM : May 19, 2008

To help her adjust to the real world, instead of the obscene ignorant world she was living in.
Reply to this comment
See all 70 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy.. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Sarah Palin's Popularity Grows, Poll Finds

    (373 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: