Comments on: California Overturns Gay Marriage Ban

State Supreme Court Ruling Paves Way To Become Second State To Allow Same Sex Marriage

Add a Comment See all 1017 Comments
by sgtrds-e4 May 15, 2008 4:48 PM EDT
Yes, dear, so now you can marry your lover--and, hopefully, get a real job.

Posted by cpaide at 01:45 PM : May 15, 2008

Actually dear I''ve been married to my lover for the past 15 years. Her name is Joan. What I wonder about is why when someone supports Ga*y rights that bigots like you automatically assume that person is Ga*y. Some of us straight people support Ga*y rights because IT''S THE RIGHT THING TO DO!!
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall May 15, 2008 4:48 PM EDT
but using the formal name of "marriage" is wrong in my opinion. A marriage is between a man and a woman...period.

Posted by tcmofo33"

Well Im married to my five dogs, so I also don''t care what it''s officially called.

youtube.com/user/dersheeple

Reply to this comment
by cpaide May 15, 2008 4:45 PM EDT
"Could not get better news today and it''s about time!"
Posted by SgtRDS-E4

Yes, dear, so now you can marry your lover--and, hopefully, get a real job.

This ruling also invalidates state laws requiring marriage to be between a man and ONE woman, so maybe the Texas Mormons can move to California and be happy there.
Reply to this comment
by superdem May 15, 2008 4:45 PM EDT
Liberty and justice for ALL. I''m sure the Republicans are going to go nuts - AGAIN (yawn). Here''s their favorite issue ! Quick, turn on C-SPAN and watch all the Republicans rush to the Senate and House floors to cry about bestiality and what God wants for America ! We can die in Iraq for Democracy, but try a little here and WHAMO, they agree with the Taliban.
Reply to this comment
by extremophil May 15, 2008 4:45 PM EDT
Big whup. The queerist land in the world now has same sexx marriage.
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 May 15, 2008 4:44 PM EDT
They actually WANT to marry? Before I shunned their faux community, I was advocating for such relationships (though called "civil unions" because I respected religion too. The G@y community shunned me, calling me things like "unevolved". It took a while, but I realized what I should have known all along. There''s nothing to be proud of, it''s a sin, and their mainstream activities DO involve disease and selfishness, or "friends with benefits" at best.

I know there are exceptions to the rule, there are decent people out there, and people can do what they want. Just don''t expect me to sit through another parade where they wear only grass skits, lift them to prove they aren''t wearing underpants, and make parade floats look like certain body parts and demand everyone take them seriously. Humor is one thing, but flashing is not.

And they should be called "civil unions". The government and its people can decide who qualifies for civil unions. Let the religions decide what their use of "marriage" means and who is allowed.

Also, we all know Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed due to selfishness; the translations skewed slightly to make g@ys scapegoats. Of course, define ''selfish''...

Also, Roseanne never needed to have apologized for some comments she made over a year ago. She was right. Why apologize for telling the truth?
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds-e4 May 15, 2008 4:42 PM EDT
Now Missouri needs to pull their head out so my partner and I can get married. We have been together for 9+ years.

Posted by acolton1 at 01:41 PM : May 15, 2008

My step-son and his partner got that one beat. They''ve been a couple for nearly 20 years. Though personally I still think he could do better.

;-)
Reply to this comment
by acolton1 May 15, 2008 4:41 PM EDT
Now Missouri needs to pull their head out so my partner and I can get married. We have been together for 9+ years.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 May 15, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
I was not raised in the church. I they have all the rights as a people. Is it Ms and Ms. Mr and Mr. It is Mr and Ms. MAN and WOMAN..
Reply to this comment
by bgwinnett May 15, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
Why not -- everyone should have the same right to be miserable I say.
Reply to this comment
by acolton1 May 15, 2008 4:39 PM EDT
Now George W. Bush and Richard Cheney and have a buttt baby.

I am glad Calif. Overturns Same-*** Marriage Ban
very happy!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by acolton1 May 15, 2008 4:38 PM EDT
VERY HAPPY its about time California Overturns Same-*** Marriage Ban.

I am happy as heck. Now all the Right Wing Super Conservative Bible Bangers Can go cry in their cool-aide, you lost this one. hahahahahaah.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 May 15, 2008 4:37 PM EDT
With a divorce rate of approximately 50%, I''m not sure that there is anything particularly sacrosanct about marriage between a man and woman.
Reply to this comment
by tcmofo33 May 15, 2008 4:35 PM EDT
Lol they censored the word GHAY...
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds-e4 May 15, 2008 4:34 PM EDT
YES! YES!! YES!!!

Could not get better news today and it''s about time!
Reply to this comment
by moneymcbush May 15, 2008 4:34 PM EDT
Now McCain and his new bathroom buddy Larry "Toe Tapper" Craig can move California and get hitched.

Here''s to the Happy Couple! Theyve been working so well together to Stop the new GI Bill, its a match made in Heaven(or in the second stall from the right.)

John McCain and Larry Craig: Together 4Ever
Reply to this comment
by tcmofo33 May 15, 2008 4:34 PM EDT
So now *** can experience the wonders of divorce, child support, spousal support and so on.

I don''t care if *** have a legal "union" or "partnership" or whatever they want to call it, (same benefits of marriage apply) but using the formal name of "marriage" is wrong in my opinion. A marriage is between a man and a woman...period.
Reply to this comment
See all 1017 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: