Comments on: President Slams Democrats On Terror

Bush Lays Out A "Doomsday Scenario" First, A Democrat In The White House, Then Another Terrorist Attack On American Soil

Add a Comment See all 212 Comments
by minnick8-2009 May 15, 2008 4:30 AM EDT
Obama is the most liberal, Marxist presidential candidate the United States has ever had run for President. I think it is really scary that so many Americans have been duped by him.
Reply to this comment
by minnick8-2009 May 15, 2008 4:28 AM EDT
McVet,
The war in Afghanistan in which the U.S. trained Osama bin laden as warrior began in the Carter Administration. Carter, a Democrat, signed authorization to conduct a secret, covert operation in Afghanistan back in 1978 to help factions in Afghanistan defeat the Russians. After the Russians left, the Taliban came to power, and Osama found refuge there along with Al Quaeda. The U.S. didn''t pay any attention to what was happening in Afghanistan during the years the first Bush was in power, and Bill Clinton looked the other way too. The ground work for 9/11 was laid by both Democrats and Republicans.
Reply to this comment
by justsane-2009 May 15, 2008 2:33 AM EDT
whew--and here i was, thinking that the man didn''t understand the meaning of sacrifice...
Reply to this comment
by liberalme May 15, 2008 1:23 AM EDT
The followin is an excerpt from MSN tonite regarding an "off the record" meeting in 2006 Rumsfield had:

The luncheon was held in December 2006, a month after Rumsfeld resigned as defense secretary.

The clips Gillis provides include one in which the media analysts suggest, with Rumsfeld''s agreement, that Iraq needs an authoritarian dictator. In another, Rumsfeld suggests that the American public lacked the "maturity" to understand that the nation remained under threat from terrorists and that the only "correction" would be another attack on the U.S.

The complete recording also clips can be found at:

http://jfxgillis.newsvine.com

Bush would like nothing better than another attack!
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey May 15, 2008 12:26 AM EDT
[bobnjersey, I see your inability to spell or construct a proper sentence means that you are on the same wavelength as Bowers. As a politics and history graduate and a person with more than four decades of experience in journalism, I am quite able to look at the full spectrum of information and draw my own conclusions.]
[Posted by ausus at 09:09 PM : May 14, 2008]

well it''s good to see that you think so highly of yourself ... and clearly superior to others.

did all that experience make you so judgemental ... or were you born with that?

http://grammarcop.com/

don''t bother addressing the issue ... cause whatever you think must be the way it is.

Reply to this comment
by ausus-2009 May 15, 2008 12:09 AM EDT
bobnjersey, I see your inability to spell or construct a proper sentence means that you are on the same wavelength as Bowers. As a politics and history graduate and a person with more than four decades of experience in journalism, I am quite able to look at the full spectrum of information and draw my own conclusions.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey May 14, 2008 11:53 PM EDT
[Your rambling contribution is just a collection of vaguely connected accusations.]
[Posted by ausus at 08:47 PM : May 14, 2008]

the reference to bush lying is clear as day ... and gwb did it again when he stood up w/ this latest speach and blamed the faulty intelligence.

besides many other examples ... the downing street memo clearly indicates that the bush admin was setting the intelligence to match the already defined policy to invade iraq ... but i suppose that memo is invisible and categorized as another ''vaguely connected accusation''.

don''t allow anything in that might confict w/ any existing belief ... it''s impact on current belief could be devestating.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey May 14, 2008 11:47 PM EDT
[Maybe I am a pessimist, maybe some of you have another version of what 2001-2008 might have been.]
[Posted by ausus at 07:24 PM : May 14, 2008]

maybe nobody knows what would have been. maybe whatever would have happened ... you would have actually heard something that resembled the truth.

maybe the tea leaves left in your cup will tell you what''s yet to come.
Reply to this comment
by ausus-2009 May 14, 2008 11:47 PM EDT
Frank Bowers, have you been on drugs since 1972? Your rambling contribution is just a collection of vaguely connected accusations.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey May 14, 2008 11:42 PM EDT
[People, you should watch this Video!! The man puts a lot into perspective. It won''''t hurt I promise. "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country." "God Speed USA"]
[Posted by donevis at 06:53 PM : May 14, 2008]

he doesn''t really say anything at all ... except if white people back obama black people will ''trash'' white people.

he provides no perspective, no foundation, and no explanation ... besides a couple of historical antedotes.

so what did i miss?
Reply to this comment
by frankbowers May 14, 2008 11:29 PM EDT
How sad I live in Houston in 1972 and that man deserted and that is a fact. Now he wishes to be a hero and Kill the rest of us. There was no lies told until he washed the facts to get them to read as he wished. Look at all the good men who have fell on the swords just to please him. He need to be in a war crimes trial as soon as possible, he knew they were no WMD or nuclear threat in Iraq, he wanted the oil and thought it would be a cake walk as a veteran i knew what we were in for the day it started HE WAS NAD AT SADAM FOR TRYING TO KILL HIS Dad. THIS SORRY BA$**** deserted as I lived in Houston when he was a deserter and they were looking for the little idiot.
Now he wants to act as if he did the right thing for the nation and created fear and hate from a group of people who will kill all Americans if they can now and he will be with the rest of us as soon as he leaves office he will have to hole up in Crawford as they will get him otherwise. To think we will have to pay for his and dic''s ignoranvce and greed the price of crude has went from 20$ to 125$ since he became president and we will have to pay for this and the cost of Rice''s ship to haul it to the reserves in South Tx.
Frank Bowers of Austin, TX
Frank Bowers
Reply to this comment
by veteran72 May 14, 2008 11:18 PM EDT
The Little Drunken Crackheaded AWOL/Deserter speaks, and no one listens.....
Someone please drag this retardd off the field before he hurts himself......what a dumbasss......
Reply to this comment
by mcvet May 14, 2008 11:02 PM EDT
Actually Osama Bin Ladin is the terrorist...NOT...our president...President Bush has taken these terrorist on...unlike all you people who want to "cut and run".

Posted by guadalcanal3 at 05:56 PM : May 14, 2008

Have you been living on another planet or are you so STUPID you don''t know that Bin Laden IS NOT in IRAQ?
With you bootlickers you never know. Question? Why would ANY honest American EVER believe anything this piece of Human Trash say''s? He''s NEVER told us the truth about anything yet. By the way Bin Laden is in PAKISTAN...in a SAFE Haven created by your Fuhrer! Now stand and let the evil corrupt incompetent LOSER know you''re still out here licking those boots! Ready?? SIEG HEIL BUSH!! Good Bootlicker!!
Reply to this comment
by ausus-2009 May 14, 2008 10:24 PM EDT
gman80214 Are you saying that the Supreme Court determined both the 2000 and 2004 elections? Both were very close and there would have been a taint to whichever candidate won. It is only a guess of what would have happened had Gore won. I believe 9/11 would still have happened. Gore''s commitment to "global warming" would have been to raise the taxes on oil so gasoline would be somewhere near the $7 a gallon it is in Europe and other energy costs would be double what they are now. There would be no involvement in Iraq and Saddam would still be in power. By 2004 he would have succeeded in getting the UN sanctions lifted so by 2006 he would have organized a third invasion of Kuwait and be well on the path to developing nuclear weapons, having retrieved his equipment from Syria. The Taliban would still control Afghanistan and possibly much of Pakistan. US unemployment would be 20% because of the energy cost disparity between China, India and the US. Maybe I am a pessimist, maybe some of you have another version of what 2001-2008 might have been.
Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie May 14, 2008 10:22 PM EDT
the people who attacked this country came from saudi arabia and yemen.
I fail to see how pulling out of Iraq will contribute to another attack on "Amurikan soil". Jackass.

Reply to this comment
by trenticus-2009 May 14, 2008 10:11 PM EDT
Wow, the pot calling the kettle black!
Reply to this comment
by jerr11 May 14, 2008 10:08 PM EDT
Posted by antixlayer at 07:04 PM : May 14, 2008



Great list!

Reply to this comment
by donevis-2009 May 14, 2008 10:00 PM EDT
OMG He gave up Golf!!! The world is saved!! This Duffer will never be on a golf course again?? Too much to believe!! I was so in love with him when he wanted to "Stay the Course". "Oh!! Never Mind" :-)
Reply to this comment
by ioweign May 14, 2008 9:57 PM EDT
Actually Osama Bin Ladin is the terrorist...NOT...our president...President Bush has taken these terrorist on...unlike all you people who want to "cut and run".

Posted by guadalcanal3 at 05:56 PM : May 14, 2008

Winning the War on Terror

"I don''t think you can win it," Mr. Bush said of the war on terror in August. In an interview on NBC''s "Today" show, he said, %u201CI think you can create conditions so that . . . those who use terror as a tool are less acceptable in parts of the world."

Before the month closed, Mr. Bush reversed himself at the American Legion national convention in Nashville. He said: "We meet today in a time of war for our country, a war we did not start yet one that we will win." He later added, "we are winning, and we will win."


Iraq and the Sept. 11 Attacks

In a press conference in September 2002, six months before the invasion of Iraq, President Bush said, "you can''t distinguish between al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror... they''re both equally as bad, and equally as evil, and equally as destructive."

In September of 2004, Mr. Bush said: "We''ve had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September 11th." Though he added that "there''s no question that Saddam Hussein had al Qaeda ties," the statement seemingly belied earlier assertions that Saddam and al Qaeda were "equally bad."

The Sept. 11 commission found there was no evidence Saddam was linked to the 9/11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.
Reply to this comment
by donevis-2009 May 14, 2008 9:53 PM EDT
From the mouth of a Revered BLACK MAN! You MUST watch this video if you support Hussein Obama!!!

http://www.youtube.com/user/
ATLAHWorldwide

People, you should watch this Video!! The man puts a lot into perspective. It won''t hurt I promise. "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country." "God Speed USA"
Reply to this comment
See all 212 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (458 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: