Comments on: Hayden: Killing Americans Is Iran's Policy
CIA Director's Comments Are The Most Brazen Denunciation Of Iran From A U.S. Official To Date
- singingrick..ok, now we are getting somewhere...so he quotes some BUSH offical...QUestion: how does that equal an immediate strike, and how could I provide proof, when it is just a quote from an un-named official. Please help me here.
- Reply to this comment
JoeCoolSwat/notblue
Ok, I''ll ask again.
Can you offer on shred of evidence to support the latest lies by the Bush administration?
No?
Thought not.
lol!- Reply to this comment
- arlt1627...can you now confirm where it says that BUSH is ready to attack these facilities tomorrow. PLEASE TELL ME, because singingrick thinks the attack is in flight, as we speak...
- Reply to this comment
JoeCoolSwat/notblue
Ok, I''ll ask again.
Can you offer on shred of evidence to support the latest lies by the Bush administration?
No?
Thought not.
lol!- Reply to this comment
singingrick...no, my point is that a reporter wrote the article, not BUSH
Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 12:16 PM : May 01, 2008
Lol!
Moron, all the writer did was quote a Bush official''s claims. He doesn''t support these claims. He''s just reporting them.- Reply to this comment
- "The top 20 Americas enemies"
1 - j-whitman
2 - FloyddZepp
3 - FallFree1(vanished)
4 - hungry1968
5 - Iceman1960 (vanished)
6 - MCVet(vanished)
7 - IRAN
8 - CHINA
9 - Muqtada Al-Sadr
10 - Hugo Chavez
11 - IOWEGN
12 - sgtRDS
13 - joyous88
14 - John Murtha
15 - John Kerry
16 - Joe Biden
17 - Harry Reid
18 - jerr11
19 - Barack HUSSEIN OSAMA
20 - Hillary Clinton
Posted by BagdadsHere at 11:28 AM : May 01, 2008
And how many are veterans ?? - Reply to this comment
- Iran is not provoking the US. It is going about its business, basically ignoring the shrub administration efforts to isolate it.
Thanks to the invasion of Iraq and the following quagmire of 5 years, Iran hasn''t had to do one single thing to rise to a position of power. Shrub and co did that for them and now they are trying to stuff the genie back in the bottle!!
Not going to happen and furthermore, if shrub does manage to start a war with Iran, it will be a MORE of a disaster than Iraq! - Reply to this comment
- ingingrick...you stupid libs are paranoid..you think dismantling a facility or 2 is "GOING TO WAR" ! everything is going to war, going to war...
Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 12:15 PM : May 01, 2008
What else do you call it? I seem to remember that planes attacking the World Trade Towers DIRECTLY led to something GW called "The War on Terror." Can''t have it both ways, sorry! - Reply to this comment
- singingrick...no, my point is that a reporter wrote the article, not BUSH
- Reply to this comment
- Joe Cool Swat:
What you don''''t realize is that the degree of enrichment is what determines whether the uranium ends up being commercial fuel or a weapon.
Current Iranian enrcihment ability is only sufficient for commercial fuel. It is FAR harder to make weapons grade uranium...it''''s the difference between say 3.2 beer and 180 proof rum.
That being said, the Iranians are only 4-5 years away from the capability if trends continue.
However, the Iranians aren''''t stupid enough to try and field a nuke..it would mean instant annihiliate from the US and Israel. They may build a nuke, but they''''d never use it offensively.
Posted by diatreme at 12:13 PM : May 01, 2008
Agreed....And I guarantee that MOSSAD knows what is going on in Iran and would take out any factory/production before it ever became "active" anyways....all we would do by invading Iran is awaken the fury of the Russians & Chinese...very stupid. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




