Comments on: Possible Abuse Of Sect Boys Investigated

Officials Tell Lawmakers Of Possible Sexual Abuse, Broken Bones Among Polygamist Children

Add a Comment See all 97 Comments
by cpaide May 1, 2008 2:50 PM EDT
"cpaide, how many little pregnant 12-year-old girl-wive have you knocked up on the Compound?"
Posted by FloydZepp

none, obviously, dear, but it sounds like you want to get your filthy lesbian hands on as many as you can. am i right?
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 May 1, 2008 12:38 PM EDT
"We do not have X-rays or complete medical information on many children so it is too early to draw any conclusions based on this information,

Actually they say they don''t have x-rays on many children they didn''t say they had no x-rays on any of the kids so from that statement it leads me to believe they do have at least some x-rays.
Reply to this comment
by rulpet May 1, 2008 12:26 PM EDT
A 7 year old girl broke her arm in cps custody, flds asks how it happened, cps launches a Propaganda campaign of 41 possible broken bones, which may be true childern have accidents and break bones, but true to form cps talks about it without hard evidence, they admit they have no xrays to back up claims.
Reply to this comment
by May 1, 2008 10:16 AM EDT
cpaide and truthalways:
Did you both have your children taken away by CPS? I wouldn''t be one bit surprised....you''re both certifiable nut cases.
Reply to this comment
by nonayabiness May 1, 2008 9:21 AM EDT
No question in my mind. If women and children were abused, why wouldn''t the boys be abused too? In other words, the folks running these ''compounds'' are sick, and/or using ''God'' as an excuse for thier repugnant behavior. I''m glad someone''s looking out for the boys, whereas most of the news is about the abuse of women and mostly female children. No doubt in my mind, people who do these types of things have no boundaries. If they did, they wouldn''t be doing these things in the first place. Glad someone''s looking out for the boys.
Reply to this comment
by rev_hellhorn May 1, 2008 5:08 AM EDT
Time to meet cpaide''s family.
---
Inbreeding among polygamists along the Arizona-Utah border is producing a caste of severely retarded and deformed children

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2005-12-29/news/forbidden-fruit
Reply to this comment
by rev_hellhorn May 1, 2008 4:50 AM EDT
So, cpaide - of all the children you have molested with God''s blessing, which one''s piteous cries to stop did you find hardest to ignore?
Reply to this comment
by cpaide May 1, 2008 4:37 AM EDT
Posted by b-easy63

you apparently know way too much about the detailed inclinations and thought processes of pedophiles to not be one. why does posting your nasty little thoughts give you such a thrill? have you tried to get help for your mental abberations?
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 4:29 AM EDT
CORRECTION:

But as far as broken bones--never. And my kids are ages 10 through 26 with all but 1 being grown. They never had burns or sprains either except the two girls. one was popped with grease while cooking bacon and the other burnt her finger with a hot glue gun 4 years ago. It has been my experience that those who accept broken bones and bruises and fractures as a matter of course are usually the negligent parents who allow their kids to run pell mell with little respect of others or their surroundings and then ruefully shake their heads when their little monsters hurt someone or themselves. The same kind of people who ignore their kids using shopping carts as SKATEBOARDS, ALSO FAIL TO raise their children AND no doubt have a LOT of broken bones--and smart mouth kids--among other things. THEY ARE ALSO THE PEOPLE WHOSE LITTLE MONSTERS ARE ALLOWED TO ROAM AROUND RESTAURANTS AND GET UNDERFOOT OF THE SERVERS, ARE ALLOWED TO KICK CHAIRS ON PLANES AND IN MOVIE THEATERS AND WHO OFTEN ARE LOOKED AT STUPIDLY AND ADORINGLY BY PARENTS AS THEY CLIMB ON THINGS THAT DO NOT BELONG TO THEM AND THEN, IF THEY FALL, THE PARENTS ARE READY TO SUE SOMEONE.

Posted by b-easy63 at 01:15 AM : May 01, 2008
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 4:18 AM EDT
Posted by robertct at 09:35 PM : Apr 30, 2008


In most states, people are not married without an official license, no matter what their age and any man with more than one "wife" is a bigamist and the second marriage does not count and is illegal NO MATTER when the law for TX were enacted. Bigamy has been illegal in all 50 states for at least 100 years.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 4:15 AM EDT
eck how many kids have had broken bones due to accidents, from faling etc???

NONE of my kids did though my son who was a starter in basketball and got a scholarship for that sport, did have torn cartilage in his knee and had to have surgery and 2 of my kids fell and had to have stitches for cuts.

But as far as broken bones--never. And my kids are ages 10 through 26 with all but 1 being grown. They never had burns or sprains either except the two girls. one was popped with grease while cooking bacon and the other burnt her finger with a hot glue gun 4 years ago. It has been my experience that those who accept broken bones and bruises and fractures as a matter of course are usually the negligent parents who allow their kids to run pell mell with little respect of others or their surroundings and then ruefully shake their heads when their little monsters hurt someone or themselves. The same kind of people who ignore their kids using shopping carts as raise their children no doubt have a LOT of broken bones--and smart mouth kids--among other things.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 4:09 AM EDT
t has nothing to do with a person''''s sexual preference or orientation. Rather, it is the lust for ***, any kind of ***.


Posted by dakotaclark at 07:09 PM : Apr 30, 2008

That is not true. Like every other group, pedophiles have definite prefereneces in age (some like them prior to puberty, others want them at onset--some like toddlers, etc and by sexxxx. Some want only girls, some want only boys and some want anything they can get) it is all very personal. Pedophiles prefer sexx with children, but I remember in our neighborhood and at our church, there were certain people we all knew "diddled with kids" and those of us who were not wanting the experience, shied clear of them. Some only wanted girls and some ignored the girls and only wanted boys--the most dangerous were the ones who could take either--similar to the idea of a ****--fvcking anything they could get. But most people have preferences--and pedophiles are no different. Many do like homosexual experiences and many who do have sexx with kids are practicing heterosexuals in the public part of their lives BUT flaming d1ck and azz hounds in the hidden part. we had a choir director like that--he loved the little boys not just to "do" but to be done to.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 4:00 AM EDT
What''''s more, most of these are straight men, even for boys. The confused masses may find that a contradiction, but it''''s not. A majority of these men that abuse even for boys have wives and or girlfriends etc...

It''''s high time we consider the possibility that many fundamentalists have been sexually abused, and that many of them seek a convenient minority scapegoat to hush up both legitimate sexual liberation by tying it to abuse of children, while conveniently ignoring children''''s rights issues by making shows telling children to keep family secrets etc... It''''s time to overthrow the hierarchy of evil that claims godliness and worldly hierarchical power over our souls. No thank you!

Posted by ttinsly at 05:32 PM : Apr 30, 2008


I disagree with you here. If a "straight male" rapes male children he is NOT straight. He is engaging in a homosexual act and married or not, is a practicing homosexual when he does so. Now, ultimately, he may be bi, but the orientation of a man is determined by sexual preference--and if it is for the *** and azz of boys--by definition that is homosexual. Not blaming anything on gay people--but if men rape boyz, they are gay or bi and yes...some pedophiles have an orientation and preference for one sexx or the other--often, the predator will cite his own initiation into such arrangements as to why he preys on others.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 3:56 AM EDT
read the bible, bro. we are many. mu ha ha.

Posted by cpaide at 05:10 PM : Apr 30, 2008


Hmmm that particular response was the answer given by a horde of demons who inhabited one man and made him crazy. When Jesus commanded the demon to name itself--it said that its name was "legion. for we are many" If that is your handle and you purport to represent or defend this "church" you might as well be the "beast" and proclaim the church the home of the antichrist. With friends like you, even if the church was essentially decent--the association with someone like you would destroy them.

...So... as "you are many" do you mean as a pedophile, there are lots of you?
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 3:50 AM EDT
It is a known fact that many Pedophiles like young males as much as females often finding anallll penetration of boys to be equal to if not better than deflowering girls. It is also a known fact that forceful penetration on a virgin child can result in broken hip and pelvic bones as well. They don''t say where the broken bones are--but this case gets uglier and sicker by the minute. If it is true--then all men who fathered children with young girls should be imprisoned. If it is false, the officials who brought these cases should be tried and imprisoned. Given the nature of many pedophiles to hide in groups like Churches feeling they can''t be persecuted and given the bed in the church--unfortunately, it probably all is true and cpaide--you sound ominously like a pedophile apologist or a cult member paid to defend your freakish compadres on the blogs--but it is not helping--pedophilia is sick no matter how people try to cloak it with religion. And those who defend it are sick and suspect also.
Reply to this comment
by cpaide May 1, 2008 3:19 AM EDT
"We already know this sort of behavior is bad for the gene pool....there''s still a long-term public health issue here."
Posted by rev_hellhorn

yes, my nazi friend, let''s cleanse the gene pool and preserve public health by exterminating these filthy jews, er, i mean these filthy mormons. you are so screwed up in the head, you don''t even know what you''re saying.
Reply to this comment
by cpaide May 1, 2008 3:15 AM EDT
"A lot of nut jobs publish books in an attempt to legitimize their beliefs."
Posted by firststate

yes, the more intelligent ones do; apparently, the rest post their comments on this message board.

you would make an excellent nazi. invade hungary (or a small texas village, in this case), accuse a group of people of being a "sect" or "cult" (as the nazis and the child protective services division did), round them up (death camp or rodeo arena, whatever) and exterminate them. and all the time claiming that they had it coming. your mother would be proud.
Reply to this comment
by firststate May 1, 2008 2:07 AM EDT
cpaide
If you''ll read the end of the quote from your post, " . . . AND THAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW."(capitalization mine) I repeat, that''s a lie. The white Mormon children are NOT being adopted by lesbians or anybody else.

The State of Texas isn''t an activist in lesbian rights. If the allegations aren''t proved, the children will return and their brainwashing can resume. Some of the pedophiles may get to reflect on the righteousness of "marrying" impregnating young girls in state custody themselves.


You cite 1 reference, a book. How many books discuss sexua[ and other abuse in cults like this one? Who are "The Lost Boys? A lot of nut jobs publish books in an attempt to legitimize their beliefs.
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 May 1, 2008 2:05 AM EDT
Yep it will be amazing if the kids don''t have serious problems from so much inbreeding.
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 May 1, 2008 1:55 AM EDT
here''''s a thought: if all the information relating to these minor children is supposed to be confidential to protect the children, why is the Department of Family and Protective Services Commissioner, Carey Cockerell, allowing all this "confidential" information to be leaked to the press?

how can this possibly be good for the children? why not just complete the investigation and THEN act on the findings without all the inaccurate information and false accusations?

the findings are not for public entertainment; they are for the use of the courts in deciding how best to protect the children.

ever thought of THAT?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by cpaide at 10:39 PM : Apr 30, 2008
.
.For a change I agree with you on that. The only thing is that even though we really shouldn''t hear all the details at least we have no names to go along with any one statement of wrong doings.
Reply to this comment
See all 97 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (327 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: