Comments on: Smoking Gun Images Of Syria Nuke Reactor?

Video Made By U.S. Intelligence Claims N. Korea Secretly Helped Syria Build A Reactor, Which Was Nearly Operational

[hungry1968]

Hungry so what you are saying is that poison gas is ineffective in large densely populated cities. ZOnly out in the desert is it dangerous killing a fewthousand lives. Do you ever read what you write? What good does it do to midigate a chemical weapons attack? What is the purpose of your statement?

Posted by notblue at 11:55 AM : Apr 25, 2008




No - what I''m saying is that Iraq NEVER posed a threat to us, and he NEVER threatened to use them against us. He never had WMD''s - AND OUR GOVERNMENT KNEW THAT.

Even if he did have the chemicals necessary, he never had a way of delivering them to America.

Do you EVER think, before you write, or do you let the christian, non-thinking side of your brain do the reasoning for you?

[joecoolswat]

mascarponi, this is old news. The destruction of the Syrian power plant was news from way back in October2007, there is no secret conspiracy by the Bushies to announce it now. The reason its comming out now, is because the Nuclear regulatory commission denouced the U.S. and Israel for acting without telling them first. Psst..(Israel and US don''t announce airstrikes anymore) we just act. No more nuclear weapon plant in Syria.

[hungry1968]

CHLORINE GAS !!! were did you get the disinformation? I guess you haven''''t seen the dead Kurks, in the thousands. That was no clorine gas from a chopper. and if I am not mistaken, he also used it against Iran, in the Iran/Iraq war.

Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 11:55 AM : Apr 25, 2008





SO WHAT?!?!

That is NO JUSTIFICATION to invade Iraq - NONE!!

WE ARE NOT THE WORLD POLICE!!! PERIOD!!!

If the chemical weapons used against Iran, the kurds, or anyone else was an issue, then it should have been the UN that addressed it - NOT AMERICA. WE ARE NOT THE WORLD POLICE!!!!

And if it was a violation of the UN Human Rights Council, then why didn''t the UN do something about it?

[joecoolswat]

No war ends, if the surrendering country does not keep up with it''s surrender agreements, then the war is back on, regardless if it is 10+ years.

[hungry1968]

Hungry..I may agree that Iraqi''''s themselves, there is not proof that they were performing Jihad on the U.S. mainland, but the point is that we were not going to wait around and find out, with another 9/11-part 2, backed by Iraq

Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 11:44 AM : Apr 25, 2008





And that is EXACTLY the fear that Bush played on. He planned on invading Iraq from day one of his presidency. In fact, "invading Iraq" should have been his 2000 campaign platform.

[joecoolswat]

forget it... even common sense escapes you. Your hatred for Bush (and Israel) is clouding even the simplist of points...Thanks for the discussion..

[hungry1968]

We don''''t just uni-laterally invade countries ! Name one (other than Iraq) because The Iraqi invasion was backed by Congress and was a follow up with obvious authorization from the 1st Iraq War.

Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 11:42 AM : Apr 25, 2008





What the hell do you mean "name one besides Iraq"? Iraq is what we''re talking about stupid!!

And there was no continuation of the first gulf war - the first Gulf War ended on February 28, 1991. How do you figure that the US had the right to break the cease fire agreement?

And Congress voted on the war authorization in spite of the fact that Bush was withholding the information from Germany and France that "curveball" was a liar and shouldn''t be believed. And since that was the ONLY PROOF of WMD''s, that should have been enough to stop the invasion.

[notblue]

Hungry so what you are saying is that poison gas is ineffective in large densely populated cities. ZOnly out in the desert is it dangerous killing a fewthousand lives. Do you ever read what you write? What good does it do to midigate a chemical weapons attack? What is the purpose of your statement?

[joecoolswat]

CHLORINE GAS !!! were did you get the disinformation? I guess you haven''t seen the dead Kurks, in the thousands. That was no clorine gas from a chopper. and if I am not mistaken, he also used it against Iran, in the Iran/Iraq war.

[hungry1968]

Question: Did Saddam or Did he not, gas his own people? That is fact..therefore how do you gas people ? WITH CHEMICAL WEAPONS !!!!!!! Chemical weapons are WMD''''s..why do you idiotically keep claiming he did not have any WMD''''s (not in the amounts suspected), but large cache''''s of Chemical suits and masks have been found, during the invasion.

Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 11:36 AM : Apr 25, 2008





What were the "chemical weapons", and how did he deliver them?

It was chlorine gas, which is very common, and it was delivered by helicopters.

Now exactly WHAT THREAT was that to America?