Comments on: Hoaxer's Phone Linked To Sect Abuse Calls

Missing Colo. Woman Claimed Multiple Personalities; Charged With Making False Abuse Reports

Add a Comment See all 89 Comments
by mrsudonim April 24, 2008 2:36 PM EDT
ccdsswrkr08,
Militia? Cult? History of Violence? What difference does it make? They are clearly different than us and must be trampled.
Reply to this comment
by kittykatty2 April 24, 2008 2:36 PM EDT
kittykatty2,
There are 16/17 year old girls with 5 and 6 year old kids. They are about to find out that some fathers have 50+ children from having *** with other children.

Is that the kind of stuff you approve of?


------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jh6379 at 09:15 AM : Apr 24, 2008
report abuse
_____________________________________
well well well...you seem to know more than the authorities do...kudo''s Matlock.
Now get your head out of the sand, start asking questions about what led up to this and stop running with the sheeple. Do I approve of 15/16 year olds having 6/7 year old children? No, I don''t. But NOT ONE PERSON HAS PROVEN THIS. Get a brain instead of believing everything that''s reported by the mainstream media. They''re out for ratings not investigating FACTS. And the authorities in this case, as in every other case are not out for the truth, they''re out to cover their *****.

Reply to this comment
by luckywinch75-2009 April 24, 2008 2:35 PM EDT
WRITE ME IN REGARDS WITH AN EMAIL ADDRESS TO DIANE SAWYER OR OTHERS THAT PERTANANT I PUT OF A SYSTEM THAT FAILS FAMILIES AND KIDS WHEN LIVES GET DESTROYED THAT ABUSES OCCUR AFTER THE SYSTEM PLACEMENTS AND ONLY A PARENT IS EXECUTED TO CONVICTIONS WHY THESE PEOPLE OF POWER AUTHORITY OVER LIVES SOMETIMES DESTROY
Reply to this comment
by zendigity April 24, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
ccdsswrkr08 - wow, sure seems like you''re an agent of propaganda to me.
As this plays out through the courts, the laws the government broke will become pretty well highlighted.
Only a small percentage of the children in that society were actually being abused, the government was WRONG for taking them all away from their parents.
No matter how badly you and the rest of your propaganda goons want to portray this as justified, it was not; the burden of proof will expose the incompetence behind the way this was all carried out.
I hate to be the one to tell you, but your cohorts bit off a lot more than they''re going to be able to chew on this one.
Reply to this comment
by luckywinch75-2009 April 24, 2008 2:33 PM EDT
I have oinformation of knowledge of this system that
i sent you earlier here today but 1500 words here is far from telling facts i hope you find the PERTANT IN FO THAT I HAD REQUESTED DIANE SAWYER IN REGARDS OF THE MORNING PROGRAM TO TODAY 4-24-08 HOW OUR LIVES GOT DESTROYED BY TRAUMAS
Reply to this comment
by ccdsswrkr08 April 24, 2008 2:31 PM EDT
rushlimpdrug,

One of the guys had a warrent out for his arrest, the other one was a known *** offender for sexually abusing minors. They were reported to have guns. Who knows what someone with a gun would do when faced with losing their children.
Reply to this comment
by bkylws April 24, 2008 2:31 PM EDT
I cannot wait to see how all this turns out.
Reply to this comment
by lochlan-2009 April 24, 2008 2:27 PM EDT
Wow, the government has screwed this one up (no surpirse). They have basically targeted a community under false pretenses and stole all their children. While I agree that any report of child abuse should be investigated, and the child services should protect the child while they do a thorough and quick investigation, we have no idea whether the several pregnant teenagers are from 15 year old boys or 50 year old men. These children are being put in foster homes, stolen from their parents, and I will have very little sympathy if any official gets guned down by one of these parents whose children were taken. I would hope it would be a lesson for them in the future, when it comes to messing with peoples kids and breaking up families. The trauma the government has put on these people and their children will never be undone. You don''t mess with peoples families in this country.

What a sad, extremly poorly handled situation.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug April 24, 2008 2:27 PM EDT

Posted by ccdsswrkr08 at 11:17 AM

You sound like a total socialist.

Your line makes those folks sound more like a militia than a cult.

They have a history of violence?
Reply to this comment
by mrsudonim April 24, 2008 2:25 PM EDT
I have heard through reliable sources - Circumspect Information Agency (CIA) - that they may have Weapons of Mass Destruction hidden within the confines of the polygamy compound. With this solid information in hand (a bogus phone call could suffice), I believe we should use the full force of our military to further trample the rights of the American citizens who live there!
Reply to this comment
by ccdsswrkr08 April 24, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
zendigity,

I offer no propoganda, only facts. You still haven''t pointed out which part violated a law.
Reply to this comment
by fibonacci_ April 24, 2008 2:18 PM EDT
She sure got them, didnt she?
Reply to this comment
by ccdsswrkr08 April 24, 2008 2:17 PM EDT
Since you have all the answers I do wonder about something.

When CPS investigates do they bring in the force of the law?

Why did the government bring in so much firepower
and all they brought on a hoax phone call?

Don''''t they investigate first?

Did they (the government/CPS) think these folks were
going to shoot them?


Posted by rushlimpdrug at 11:07 AM : Apr 24, 2008

Question 1) If the alleged maltreators are reported to be armed then yes, CPS does bring law enforcement when they go to investigate.

Question 2)There was more than one phone call reporting abuse, and the FLDS were reported to be armed.

Question 3)Based on multiple phone calls reporting abuse, and the evidence that two leaders of the FLDS were either registered as *** Offenders or had warrents for their arrest for Sexual offenses, yes they did investigate before they went out there.

Question 4)If you were advised that someone was armed and you were going to go to their home to investigate something that involved possibly removing their children from their home, wouldn''t you want to have armed law enforcement as a back up just in case the parents decided to take it upon themselves to "protect" their children from being taken?
Reply to this comment
by zendigity April 24, 2008 2:12 PM EDT
ccdsswrkr08 - yes, I do know how the system works, and I understand the way the law works too. You are clearly here in order to push your propaganda hoping to cover the a$$es of your cohorts who so obviously overstepped their boundaries.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug April 24, 2008 2:07 PM EDT

If you do by all means please inform me of which part of this was unlawful.
Posted by ccdsswrkr08 at 10:45 AM


Since you have all the answers I do wonder about something.

When CPS investigates do they bring in the force of the law?

Why did the government bring in so much firepower
and all they brought on a hoax phone call?

Don''t they investigate first?

Did they (the government/CPS) think these folks were
going to shoot them?
Reply to this comment
by ccdsswrkr08 April 24, 2008 1:45 PM EDT
Zendigity

Do you know how this system works? Do you know the laws that apply? If you do by all means please inform me of which part of this was unlawful.
Reply to this comment
by zendigity April 24, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
ccdsswrkr08 - Nothing about the way the government is acting in this situation seems all that lawful...you''re clearly more interested in protecting your own a$$ than anything else.
Reply to this comment
by zendigity April 24, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
ojama - I''m with you, I don''t like the idea of the government lying to the people "for the greater good". Too easily this type of thing can be warped into the government locking people up and then launching propaganda to justify their doing so.

What comes next...building large ovens in order to "get rid" of any evidence of their wrong-doing?
Reply to this comment
by ccdsswrkr08 April 24, 2008 1:24 PM EDT
ojama,

They are doing it the lawful way. Please see previous posts by myself and jh6379.
Reply to this comment
by ccdsswrkr08 April 24, 2008 1:03 PM EDT
"You have no idea about CPS or how they work.
btw...see my second to last post."
Posted by jh6379 at 09:52 AM


I looked.

How do they work?

Do they work?

Posted by rushlimpdrug at 10:01 AM : Apr 24, 2008

See my last post. If you have anymore questions about how CPS works, I''d be more than happy to answer your questions.
Reply to this comment
See all 89 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (458 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: