Comments on: Cheney Approved Harsh Interrogations

Reports: Senior Officials Kept President Bush In Dark Over Meetings On "Torture" Tactics

[j-whitman]

speakinup,,,, There is no such thing as a Good Republican

[j-whitman]

speakinup,,,, I''ll give you credit for one fact on that --- That gives you about 1 out of a million on fact credit

[speakinup]

hateandlies - chicken out? No a good Republican is worth at least four liberals in any type of a fight.


You can be certain when I leave it is not because of something the likes of you posted.

Usually, it''s boredom. I can only stand refuting the same idiot remarks for so long - and there is next to nil factual content.

[sgtrds]

ain''''t no credit for you j-whitman. So, did you or didn''''t you say the president could still be convicted by congress without impeachment ?



I mean, I''''d just like to make sure we got the FACTs right J.

Posted by speakinup at 03:37 PM : Apr 11, 2008

Actually just like any other citizen he can be convicted of Contempt of Congress without being impeached.

[speakinup]

ain''t no credit for you j-whitman. So, did you or didn''t you say the president could still be convicted by congress without impeachment ?



I mean, I''d just like to make sure we got the FACTs right J.

[sgtrds]

speakinup,,,, Too much time, efort & expense anyway --- Tar & Feathering is cheaper & much faster

Posted by j-whitman at 03:17 PM : Apr 11, 2008

And much more fun! Esp if it''s boiling hot tar!

[speakinup]

"Hey speakinup and blondbeotch,
On November 4, 2008, I will be voting for Obama. Does that scares you? - hateandlies


Nah - he ain''t gotta chance. He''s havin a hand full just taking on Hillary!


Wait until he has to fight a real opponent.

[j-whitman]

speakinup,,,, You give your self too much credit for non-accomplishment

Oh, that''s right - You gave Bush too much credit for his lack of accomplishments also

[speakinup]

""Congress still has the power to convict without impeachment" -J

"J, Impeachment is the first of two stages in a specific process for a legislative body to remove a government official without that official''s agreement. The second stage is conviction. They can''t convict the President unless they Impeach first. They can debate and that would be it. - speakinup

"Too much time, efort & expense anyway --- Tar & Feathering is cheaper & much faster - J

DING DING DING DING DING!!!!!

LA-DIES and GEN-TELL-MEN, It''s TKO in the first round - speakinup puts away J-whitman in two posts.

The UN-DEE-SPUTED Champion - SPEEEEEE-KEEEEEEN-UPPPPP!


Unh - yah - I uh saw my op pin in write aftr he op pinned hiz mouf. BIP! An he was down.

[sgtrds]

SgtRDS,,,, They will mobilize the Blaimstorm Troops goose stepping in unison complete with their swastika arm bands.

Posted by j-whitman at 03:23 PM : Apr 11, 2008

With their fearless leader mudrose marching in the back (where no one can get to him).

[lovegetpeace]

Hey speakinup,
For a moment, I thought you had chicken out of here.

On November 4, 2008, I will be voting for Obama. Does that scares you?

[speakinup]

AaaBee - I can see we have yet ANOTHER liberal idiot that doesn''t know the distinction between a "false statement" and a "lie".


If j-whitman were to say that sgtRDS was a US Marine Coprs vet, based on what he learned on this site, and later SgtRDS said he hadn''t been telling the truth - would you call J-whitman a liar ? No.

That would be a false statement. Now, if J-whitman kept on saying SgtRDS was a US Marine Vet, knowing full well that SgtRDS had recanted his statement - THEN J-whitman would be a liar.

False statements are ONLY lies when one knows them to be untrue. The 934 False Statements in your ''Bush 934 lies:'' web site were believed by ALL to be true statements at the time.


BUT AIN''T IT AMAZING - you far left folks keep on insisting they are "lies."

Bill Clinton and Hillary said the same statements, are they in the article ? No.


Why do you suppose it wasn''t mentioned in the article ? Why do you suppose the original article never used the word lie (I can''t vouch your yor site) ? Because 1) Soros wanted to publish something that would get rabble like you all upset, and 2) he didn''t want to lose an extremely embarrasing law suit.

So, are you a liar, or do you recant ?

[j-whitman]

SgtRDS,,,, They will mobilize the Blaimstorm Troops goose stepping in unison complete with their swastika arm bands.

[aaabee-2009]

"justified using harsh tactics on detainees held overseas so long as military interrogators did not specifically intend to torture their captives"

How does one not specifically intend not to torture using harsh tactics?

Is there a manual?

Did someone test the parameters of the manual?

Is screaming a clue that you have entered the specific torturing arena? Or is it the look of anquish, or the writhing? What?

[sgtrds]

I am worried what they will do if McCain wins. There will be no blaming liberals for the last years of the Bush administration if a Republican sits in the WH.

It will take all their fun away.

Posted by AaaBee at 03:17 PM : Apr 11, 2008

Naw, they''ll just go back to blaming Bill Clinton like they always do.

[aaabee-2009]

Hey speakinup and blondbeotch,
On November 4, 2008, I will be voting for Obama. Does that scares you? Posted by lovegetpeace at 03:09 PM : Apr 11, 2008

No, it''ll make them happy if a Dem wins. They will be here the day of to blame liberals some more.

I am worried what they will do if McCain wins. There will be no blaming liberals for the last years of the Bush administration if a Republican sits in the WH.

It will take all their fun away.

[j-whitman]

speakinup,,,, Too much time, efort & expense anyway --- Tar & Feathering is cheaper & much faster

[sgtrds]

Posted by AaaBee at 03:12 PM : Apr 11, 2008

I agree, they should all be punished equally.

[popstom1]

I ment CIA agents

[popstom1]

theres countrys were the CIA will arrested for kidnapping