Comments on: Judge: Suicide Victim's Family Can Sue NBC

$105M Suit Alleges Sex Sting By NBC's "To Catch A Predator" Drove Man To Kill Himself

Add a Comment See all 217 Comments
by jetlizhan February 28, 2008 12:47 AM EST
jew29582-

invest on some tutoring in spelling. chris hansen has rid the streets of a lot of trash - are you saying you are for this trash infiltrating our youth? wow, shame on you. you''re no better than the pedophiles preying on our children.
Reply to this comment
by kiokwus February 28, 2008 12:43 AM EST
RowdyTexan2 If you believe that perverted justice is a group of professionals, then the world is flat and the sun rotates around the Earth. Perverted Justice is exactly what the name implies, they are perverts who believe they have the right to serve Justice as they see fit in any shape or form. There is not one member of that group or the many sub-groups they have that serves Justice.

A word of advice, stay away from vigilante groups such as this or you will fall as hard as they will, and that is not to far in the future. Every single member, if they were honest individuals, would be more than happy to show themselves by name rather than an AKA.

This instance is not the only murder they are to be held accountable for, there are many others who after being duped, died due to the illegal, approved by NBC, actions. They believe they are above the law and as such, no one can touch them or they will in turn attack that person with a smear campaign of false and fabricated "events", "charges", "being listed as a pedophile, and worse. These criminals have no morals and take great pleasure with the destruction of any person whether there is truth to an accusation or not. This is their MO and the sad thing is the American public, in their lust for anything sexual, allows them to survive.

Best to let law officials do their job, and keep these vigilante groups such as Perverted Justice under surveillance.
Reply to this comment
by jew29582 February 28, 2008 12:24 AM EST
Im so glad to hear that someone is finally going after Chris Hansen and Dateline NBC the are all worthless exccuses for humans. Can you say intrapment!!! Lets exploit people to sell advertising on television. Rot in hell Chris Hansen you are white trash!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by jew29582 February 28, 2008 12:23 AM EST
Im so glad to hear that someone is finally going after Chris Hansen and Dateline NBC the are all worthless exccuses for humans. Can you say intrapment!!! Lets exploit people to sell advertising on television. Rot in hell Chris Hansen you are white trash!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by jew29582 February 28, 2008 12:22 AM EST
Im so glad to hear that someone is finally going after Chris Hansen and Dateline NBC the are all worthless exccuses for humans. Can you say intrapment!!! Lets exploit people to sell advertising on television. Rot in hell Chris Hansen you are white trash!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by jew29582 February 28, 2008 12:20 AM EST
Im so glad to hear that someone is finally going after Chris Hansen and Dateline NBC the are all worthless exccuses for humans. Can you say intrapment!!! Lets exploit people to sell advertising on television. Rot in hell Chris Hansen you are white trash!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey February 27, 2008 11:53 PM EST
[Just because he didn''''t have the opportunity to ''''physically take part in the molestation due to getting caught does not make him any less guilty of seeking out an underaged male for *** - he showed intent, and if it were a REAL 13 y/old, and the opportunity arose due to not being caught, and he did molest him, then what?]
[Posted by sbbm at 08:45 PM : Feb 27, 2008]

exactly where did he ''show'' the intent? was it at the point where he physically typed it at the keyboard of his computer? or maybe it wasn''t until that post actually made it to the other end? or was it not until the alleged 13 year old (which he has no way of really knowing) actually consumed the message he had sent?

or was it long before that ... when the thought ran thru his head to have *** w/ a young girl?

where''s the line where it goes from just a fantasy ... to making it reality?
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 February 27, 2008 11:30 PM EST
RowdyTexan2 at 08:06 PM : Feb 27, 2008


Hell must be having a snowstorm. . .

You and I agree.

:-)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by tuckerndfw at 08:19 PM : Feb 27, 2008

ROFL! Well, I reckon! It was cold over here last nite!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 February 27, 2008 11:25 PM EST
My point is that the child molester needs to be caught...and I can''''t fathom Tucker saying that these men are ''''lured'''' into a sexual act - not when they are already engaging in the act to begin with - it''''s about common sense, morals and protection of our kids...it''''s not rocket science


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by sbbm at 08:17 PM : Feb 27, 2008

Yes, they need to be caught by law enforcement professionals.

But if you look at this particular instance, this man was, in fact, on the computer with an adult posing as a child. He did not show up at the house to physically take part in molesting a child. In this instance...he did not break the law! And then he was hauled out of his house like some kind of terrorist! All for the entertainment of a bunch of numb nuts watching tv!

Anybody who molests a child and lures them into physical sexual acts should be prosecuted to the highest degree of the law. That I agree with.

But I also have to question. Where are these children''s parents? What are they doing on the computer in a situation where they are vulnerable? It''s not like parents aren''t aware of this. They also need to take responsibility for their negligence.

If it were left up to me, I''d haul in a sexual pervert and haul in the negligent parent at the same time!
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 February 27, 2008 11:20 PM EST
I could have sworn that I saw a post by gkc99, where he called tucker "**********" but when I looked again it was gone. Geez, was I seeing things that weren''t there?":)
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 February 27, 2008 11:06 PM EST
"Tucker...what??? no, they are hiring professionals to scope the internet in the hopes of CATCHING the sexual predator before they hurt an innocent child - "

This individual was a pervert on the internet engaging with sexual talk with supposedly children. However he did not show up at the house to physically participate in having *** with the child.

But no, NBC is not some do-gooder television station. They are in the business of of television to get ratings and make money. And to me it is just as sick a perversion to provoke situations of entrapment of people for the sole purpose of entertaining somebody sitting in their tv chair with a remote allowing them to snicker at it someone elses bad life!

There are law enforcement agengies designed just for this purpose. Let them do their job, and let justice be served.

But to sell it as entertainment is sickening!
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 February 27, 2008 10:13 PM EST
a "predator" was "enticed"...how is it that you entice a predator???
Posted by rgoodiel at 05:36 PM : Feb 27, 2008



By looking like what he/she ''preys'' upon.
Reply to this comment
by balto_babs February 27, 2008 9:09 PM EST


tuckerndfw -

You are a LIAR.
In one post you say you are quoting a professor:
%u2026%u201DAs my psychology professor told us long ago (before the media became judges, juries and executioners), the most harm inflicted on children is from the reaction to events.%u201D

In another post you have a minor in psychology:

%u2026%u201DMy minor in college was psychology, emphasis on abnormal psychology. My major was law, emphasis on criminal law.

In yet another post you claim to be an experienced professional counselor (which requires advanced degrees):

%u2026%u201DI am a former family counselor and have first hand experience dealing with victims of all kinds.

What you are is full of BS and will apparently say anything to counter someone else%u2019s argument. You blame the police, NBC, the parents - everyone BUT the predator.

If you think these pedophiles are doing no harm then I%u2019m beginning to believe you are just like all other pedophiles, blaming the victim. Telling the victim they %u201Cwant the abuse%u201D, that the victims are just as guilty as you, the predator, for what happens. Making excuses for your actions at any cost.

Everyone on this board has figured out what you are!!!
Reply to this comment
by generey February 27, 2008 9:00 PM EST
1 - Glad to hear that the little freak smoked himself. 2 - Put me on the jury. 3 - Get that "judge" out of office.
Reply to this comment
by randynason February 27, 2008 8:51 PM EST
Good! I really dislike NBC. I think the way they report news to be sorely lacking and is more like propaganda exchange than real, objective journalism. Well, Chris, tell me- Did "reality entrapment" really help your failing ratings?
Reply to this comment
by kiokwus February 27, 2008 8:37 PM EST
America was formed under rule of law. It is these laws that makes this country great. Do away with these laws and we become no better than those who appose our way of life. If the laws are wrong, change them. If the laws do not do as intended, remove them, create laws that DO WORK as intended. The current set of laws dealing with *** offenders, do nothing to prevent or save any child from harm. Think about it before you make claims.

I need not go into statistics as the armchair vigilante will "discredit" the truth as being fiction. It is a sad day that fiction has taken presidence over truth when is comes to protecting our children. These children are our future and we need to do anything that is needed to protect them. The first step comes from within the home. Are they being educated how to tell the difference between good and bad touch? To tell an adult what has happened without fear of doing so? Are the laws and registries doing as they were intended to do? Most of the time, it is left to someone else to teach the children the good and bad. In all cases, the registries do nothing but destroy those who have been listed and their families AFTER the fact, not before any crime has taken place. These registries do more harm than the original offense to those who have any form of association, albeit victim or offender.

I''m sorry many feel the need to express hate rather than suggesting viable answers to this national problem. *** abuse affects everyone........
Reply to this comment
by rgoodiel February 27, 2008 8:36 PM EST
I believe he judged himself to be GUILTY, not me, not you. If he hadn''t carried out his own sentence, he could have easily defended himself in a court of law
because......wait for it, in your words..

a "predator" was "enticed"...how is it that you entice a predator???


Reply to this comment
by kiokwus February 27, 2008 8:28 PM EST
gkc99 You sound like one of the armchair vigilantes I talked about in a prior post. Making claims you cannot back up shows......

Yes, it is the responsibility of parents to over see what their children are doing on any computer. There are many different programs that can limit what sites they can go to and participate in. Chat rooms are something that needs to have some sort of verification before being allowed to join, such as a CC# or DL# of the approving parent. Otherwise, no access. Is that so very difficult for you to understand? Until that happens, parents can limit where the children go and no other sites allowed.

Sexual abuse is not a game or something for idiots to post nonsensical statements of death or destruction to anyone "caught" doing wrong, perceived or otherwise. Doing so places you in the same category as the perverts who enjoy playing children unrestrained from any accepted laws or rules. Are you per chance one who fits this classification?

There is, again, the right way and a wrong way to do any type of action. Do it wrong and no results happen other to shame a person and it is forgotten within days. Do it the right way, and a person is legally charged for his/her actions and tried by a court of law. This is the real system, not one of vigilante justice that in most cases, harms or worse an innocent person mistaken for someone else. Do you fit this profile as well?


Reply to this comment
by rgoodiel February 27, 2008 8:26 PM EST
Well said GKC, I think Tucker and Tomanyt are already in a room with each other and strokin each others ego, and I don''t mean ego. You idiots cannot be serious, you have to be getting some satisfaction from responding to morons like me taking time to respond to your ill thinking.

And you know what, truthfully, at this point it doesn''t matter if it will stand up in a court of law. One offender already deemed himself guilty and carried out the punishment and the others that were exposed on this program, have been tagged and anyone that knows/employs/is married to or kin to, now knows their true colors. So in my opinion, it has been a huge success and any of them that "chatted" with someone "they believed" to be underage, deserves everything negative that comes their way.

Reply to this comment
by gkc99 February 27, 2008 8:13 PM EST
"gkc99...Seriously, get some professional help"--Posted by tomanyt


The professional help you''ll need will be of the legal defense variety if you get caught acting out your baby raping fantasies. You''re a sick puppy.
Reply to this comment
See all 217 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Senate Report: Bin Laden Was Within Grasp

    (166 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: