Comments on: Bush Again Demands Telecom Immunity
President Repeats Calls For Lawsuit Protection Over Wiretaps; Would Surveillance Suffer Without It?
Add a Comment See all 206 Comments
- The bill is just what it says it is. We need to ensure that no one can bring our intelligence efforts to a halt by tyeing up our communications companies in civil harrassment law suits.
The same people who whined that our government didn''t protect us from 9/11, now wants to hamstring our efforts to provide that very protection. - Reply to this comment
- WATERBOARD SHRUB
THEN IMPEACH HIM!!! THE WORLDS BIGGEST CRIMINAL ! - Reply to this comment
- Bush is trying to keep himself out of jail when he leaves office. That is all. If the telcos can be sued for the illegality of breaching privacy rights, then so can Bush. Simple. And it won''t work.
- Reply to this comment
- The current law is effective and there exist no reason for a new one.The Bush adminitration is wrong on this one.
- Reply to this comment
- Its been said before .. if they aren''t doing anything illegal they don''t need immunity.
- Reply to this comment
- This is about protecting B-U-S-H not the telcos. He knows that a civil suit will lead to him and his breaking of current US laws. We are a country of laws, aren''t we?
- Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
